10 DANGEROUS MYTHS ABOUT THE HONG KONG PROTESTS

Source: HK students online

 

Myth 1: Business has ground to a halt. “I don’t think organizing something that shuts down business is positive for Hong Kong,” lamented John Slosar, multi-millionaire chairman of Swire.

Not true. More than 1,255,896 registered companies operate in Hong Kong. Only a handful have closed down. More new ones have opened than have closed.

******

Myth 2: “The Occupy Central protests are illegal,” thunders China official Li Yuanchao.

Not true. In free, economically growing societies, non-violent protests, even if they are disruptive, are a protected form of criticism. Only in controlled, repressed, communist or authoritarian states are peaceful demonstrators prosecuted.

*****

Myth 3: “Beijing never gives way in response to public demonstrations in Hong Kong,” say Exco members.

Not true. Beijing has regularly responded positively to pro-democracy campaigners in Hong Kong, where the pro-Beijing elite said it was not possible. For example, Beijing shelved the security laws in 2005, widened the democratic element in the Legco reforms of 2010, and withdrew the pro-China education laws in 2012.
*****

Myth 4: “The protesters are still out there blocking roads.”

Not true. After the first tear gas incident, there were more than 200,000 people on the streets, but typical figures today run from a few hundred to a few thousand. More than 98 per cent of protesters have taken their peaceful call for democracy to their homes and workplaces.

*****
Myth 5: “The protesters are almost all young students.” – news reports.

Not true. At various times, in different gatherings, from 20 to 60 per cent of the demonstrators have been counted as adults, grandparents, school children and family groups.

*****
Myth 6: “Beijing has not reacted to the Hong Kong demonstrations.”

Not true. China has been given a chance to re-live the Tiananmen Square demonstrations of June 1989, and has deliberately made the choice to not send in the troops, well-placed sources say. This is not a small thing.

*****
Myth 7: The Hong Kong democracy movement has been left in a worse situation than before—Chugani, SCMP.

Not true. Supporters of the 68-year-old call for democracy in Hong Kong had fallen dramatically in numbers and in spirit before the protests started. The umbrella movement has given it an injection of energy big enough to change Hong Kong’s DNA.

*****
Myth 8: A huge number of people have signed a petition against the protests—Oriental Daily

Not true. The recent signature campaign has been organized under banners with the message “support the police”. But all social groups in Hong Kong support the police and the rule of law, especially the protesters, who are calling for official, written promises to be observed.

*****
Myth 9: “Foreign forces are to blame for Hong Kong’s protests.” CY Leung

Not true. Of the past 100 major demonstrations that have taken place under the auspices of authoritarian governments in the past 10 years, 100% have been blamed by leaders on “foreign forces”.

*****
Myth 10: The disaster of the protests is that society in Hong Kong has been tragically polarized — SCMP.

 

Not true. The richest, freest, healthiest, happiest societies in the world have a system featuring a regular swing between two major parties or opinion groups. Economic historians say the recognition that the opposition is no less loyal than the ruling party is the key to a society’s future success.

 

Hong Kong must have the universal rights to vote and to stand for election.

Petition by Visual Artists Guild

 

https://www.change.org/p/president-of-the-united-states-hong-kong-must-have-the-universal-rights-to-vote-and-to-stand-for-election

MdSyjKVUIXAKDpe-556x313-noPad

 

Dear President Obama,

As you embark on your trip to Beijing for the APEC economic conference, do follow the recommendations by the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China that “Hong Kong issues should be raised in meetings in Beijing with central government officials.”

The argument by China that Hong Kong is China’s internal issue is not valid as the following points show:

*  The UN Human Rights Committee stated on October 23 that the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights treaty which Hong Kong has ratified and agreed upon by China compels Hong Kong to respect the right to free election.  The Committee has given China two months to respond.

*  Hong Kong is a member of APEC since 1991 and reaffirmed by Beijing in 1997; therefore Hong Kong’s future is of paramount importance to APEC discussion.

*  As the eighth largest economy in the world, Hong Kong is an essential factor on global economy and for APEC.

*  Consistently at the top economic freedom index in the world, Hong Kong’s rule of law (as opposed to China’s rule by law), independent judiciary (as opposed to China’s Party controlled judiciary), freedom of the press (as opposed to China’s information censorship) and low corruption have all helped Hong Kong maintain its position.

*   The current attacks on Hong Kong’s journalists ( 27 violent attacks since September 28 as documented by IFJ, International Federation of Journalists) will greatly affect the climate of doing business in Hong Kong in the future.  The physical attack on Apple Daily, an independent newspaper in Hong Kong and the cyber attack on its web sites should be of great concern in Hong Kong press  freedom as well.

*   HSBC’s removal of its advertisement from Apple Daily and HSBC Director’s comment that Hong Kong pro-democracy activists should wait to get the right to vote like slaves in the United States had to do, is an insult not only to Hong Kong people but to China’s rulers as well.

*   Dubbed the most civil of civil disobedience, Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement, as the protest is now called, has been most peaceful in all respects; no one car overturned and no one store window broken.  The dire warnings by the Big Four accounting firms, EY, KPMG, Deloitte and PwC never materialize.

*  Despite President Xi Jinping’s meeting with the tycoons in Hong Kong prior to the protests and despite the Xinhua news agency’s editorial last week to pressure the tycoons, no tycoon has made any statements against the students.  Li Ka-shing, Hong Kong’s richest man merely stated that he understood the students’ passion, that they have made their point and asked them to go home.

*   There have been claims of a silent majority opposing the protesters.  However, if it were true, why would there be needs of paid agitators against the protesters and why would the triads, the criminal elements in Hong Kong be involved as even the Hong Kong police has acknowledged.  Bringing in criminal elements would certainly affect the business atmosphere in Hong Kong in the future.

The outcome of the current protests in Hong Kong will be an indicator of what will happen in the next 33 years.  Your meeting with China’s President Xi must provide hope for the young people of Hong Kong that the world do stand on their side in their struggle for their rights.

 

Yours truly,

Visual Artists Guild