Eileen Gu is brimming with wealth; Alysa Liu’s Noble Character are Evident

WRIC                        02-17-2026

 

A BBC reporter, in their report, bluntly stated that an unusual battle was unfolding at the Milan Winter Olympics—not on the ski slopes or ice rinks, but online.

 

At the heart of this debate are freestyle skier Eileen Gu and figure skater Alysa Liu. They share many similarities: both are Chinese Americans born and raised in the United States, and both dominate their respective fields.

 

Social media is also abuzz with comparisons: Liu and Gu have similar backgrounds. Both are winter sports champions, both have parents who were early immigrants to the US—intellectually Chinese Americans—both are of mixed race, and both were raised by single-parent Chinese parents. However, they also have significant differences. Liu is simple and cheerful, while Gu is shrewd. This is evident in an early video of the two together. I believe this difference stems from the influence of their different family upbringings.

 

Eileen Gu (left) and Alysa Liu: Their drastically different paths in life amidst ice and snow. BBC Photo.

 

Former NBA player Enes Kanter Freedom posted on the X platform calling Eileen Gu a “traitor” and accusing her of “being born, raised, and currently residing in the United States, yet choosing to stand against her own country—China—one of the world’s worst human rights abusers.” He added, “You can’t enjoy the freedoms of an American citizen while simultaneously becoming a global public relations tool for the Chinese Communist Party.”

 

This is reminiscent of a statement Gu made in 2020 when facing questions about her nationality: “When I’m in the United States, I’m American, but when I’m in China, I’m Chinese.”

 

According to data from the sports business publication Sportico, Gu earned $23 million last year, almost entirely from endorsements.

 

Under Chinese law and Olympic regulations, she cannot legally represent two countries. According to Olympic regulations, Gu must be a Chinese citizen to represent China. However, her name is not on the U.S. National Archives’ list of people who have renounced their citizenship.

 

An article titled “5 Things You Didn’t Know About Eileen Gu” published on the German-language page of the International Olympic Committee in January 2021 mentions at the end that Gu holds “dual citizenship.” However, this conflicts with Chinese law: China does not recognize dual citizenship.

 

Red Bull, one of Eileen Gu’s sponsors, stated on its website in 2022 that she had renounced her U.S. citizenship, but the website removed this information after media inquiries. Eileen Gu herself has consistently refused to disclose her nationality.

Alysa Liu, a figure skater representing the United States and also born and raised in the U.S., has become the subject of praise on social media by Eileen Gu ‘s critics.

 

Alysa Liu has no ambiguous nationality, no “burden of two countries,” and no suspicion of supporting authoritarian regimes. On the contrary, her family is closely connected to the Chinese democracy movement.

 

Alysa Liu’s father, Arthur Liu (also known as Liu Junguo), was a key figure in the 1989 Tiananmen Square student movement and served as the chairman of the Guangzhou Students’ Autonomous Federation. He was later rescued by “Operation Yellow Bird” and went to the United States, where he is now a lawyer.

 

Wu Renhua, a scholar specializing in the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, posted on the X platform that he and Alysa Liu ‘s father, Arthur Liu, were old friends with a friendship spanning over thirty years. He claimed that the CCP had attempted to bribe and win over Alysa Liu , but this was rejected by both Arthur Liu and Alysa Liu . After their attempts to bribe and win over her failed, the CCP resorted to harassment and intimidation, leading the FBI to take protective measures against Alysa Liu .

 

According to CNN, in October 2021, the FBI knocked on Alysa Liu ‘s door, stating that her father’s political background made the family a target for Chinese espionage.

In a recent cartoon created by Badiucao, a Chinese dissident artist residing in Australia, Arthur Liu is depicted as “Tank Man,” preventing the CCP from suppressing the democracy movement.

 

On February 11, Alysa Liu won a gold medal for the United States in the team figure skating event at the Italian Winter Olympics.

 

Her name was deleted from Beijing municipal budget documents.

 

Winning a silver medal would be something any athlete could be proud of, but Gu Ailing’s performance is becoming a sensitive topic on Chinese social media.

 

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, a municipal budget released in early 2025 showed that the Beijing Municipal Sports Bureau planned to pay a total of approximately $6.6 million to Eileen Gu and another Chinese-American athlete, Zhu Yi (or Beverly Zhu), for that year. The document did not list their individual compensation, but as a three-time Olympic medalist, Gu’s share of the funding was likely larger.

 

The report stated that, in total, the Beijing Municipal Sports Bureau planned to pay Gu and Zhu nearly 100 million yuan (US$14 million) over the past three years. According to the budget, the most recent allocation was intended to help Gu qualify for the 2026 Milan Winter Olympics and achieve excellent results.

 

Shortly after Gu and Zhu’s names appeared in the budget document and attracted attention, they were removed.

 

This huge expenditure sparked heated discussion on social media in 2025, given the numerous economic difficulties facing China. Subsequently, related comments were also removed.

 

Clearly, this places an even heavier “national burden” on Gu’s shoulders.

 

After winning her second silver medal at the Italian Winter Olympics early Tuesday morning, Eileen Gu adopted a different stance, no longer discussing the “burden of two countries.” “Winning a medal at the Olympics is a life-changing experience, and doing it five times is even more difficult,” she said. “Looking at it from the perspective of ‘losing two gold medals’ is absurd. I’m showcasing my best skiing skills and performing unprecedented maneuvers, and that’s enough.”

 

 

Liu Fenglan Has Been Fighting for Her Rights for Six Years and Has Been Forcibly Sent to A Mental Hospital Five Times.

WRIC                                  02-15-2026

 

Liu Fenglan, a woman from Hubei province, has been fighting for her rights for six years, enduring five forced admissions to mental hospitals.

 

Liu Fenglan alleges that between 2021 and 2026, she was repeatedly forcibly admitted to mental hospitals and subjected to torture including electric shocks and forced medication.

 

Liu Fenglan says she was forcibly admitted to a mental hospital five times, suffering severe torture.

 

 

 

Since being admitted to a mental hospital on October 28, 2021, by village secretary Wang, she has endured 175 days of detention, forced to undergo MECT (Mechanical, Electrically Interventional Therapy) seven times, subjected to bondage and abuse, and forced administration of 2,738 pills—at least 20 pills daily, far exceeding the dosage for actual patients. This resulted in her clothes being soaked with sweat, her throat being injured, and her livestreaming career being forced to stop.

 

To clear her name, she studied the “Mental Health Law of the People’s Republic of China,” learning that mental illness patients must voluntarily be hospitalized, and that no person or organization other than close relatives may forcibly admit them; otherwise, it is illegal.

 

On February 7, 2026, she released a cover of the song “Mental Hospitals Must Be ‘Beautiful’,” and netizens in the comments section expressed sympathy and support. Liu Fenglan, a resident, was forcibly placed in a mental hospital and subjected to “chemical torture” simply for legitimately defending her rights, abusing the power of village party secretary Wang Hongshan.

 

A recent case is that of Xu Xinrui, a female college student from Sichuan. Xu Xinrui was forcibly sent to a mental hospital for reporting the community secretary and had been detained for eight years by 2025. Even though the hospital claimed her “condition was stable,” she was trapped in a vicious cycle of never being discharged because she needed to be picked up by her workplace and both her parents were deceased. The hospital, in turn, received substantial medical subsidies as a result.

 

According to Minghui.org, Falun Gong has suffered severe persecution for 25 years, with a large number of practitioners dying from drug abuse in mental hospitals; in 2025 alone, 124 people died as a result of persecution, some of whom had been detained in mental hospitals before their deaths.

 

The anchor of the program “Deep Exposure” commented: In this 175-day illegal detention, medical ethics were utterly nonexistent. The hospital refused to provide medical records, and Wang Hongshan wielded boundless power. Behind this collusion between officials and businessmen, and between government and doctors, lies the complete collapse of grassroots governance. We must ask: Were these 2,738 nerve-destroying drugs intended to treat illness, or to silence witnesses?

 

The anchor commented that this case marks the extreme deterioration of local stability maintenance methods. They no longer address the demands of the people, but instead directly use drugs and electric shocks to eliminate those who raise them. We urge the international community and legal professionals to continue to pay attention, and not allow “being labeled mentally ill” to become a panacea for official retaliation.

 

See video: https://x.com/i/status/2022647259452838302

 

 

VAG: Statement by Visual Artists Guild re Sentence of Jimmy Lai

 Visual Artists Guild                                    02 -14-2026

 

Visual Artists Guild to be presented on February 14, 2026 in front of the Consulate of the Peoples’ Republic of China in Los Angeles.

 

Visual Artists Guild condemns the 20-year prison sentence imposed on February 9 on Jimmy Lai, a Hong Kong media entrepreneur who stood up for freedom of the press and freedom of speech.

 

Mr. Lai’s prosecution was brought under the Hong Kong National Security Law which Beijing imposed on Hong Kong and which took effect on June 30, 2020.

 

Mr. Lai’s trial was initially scheduled for December 2022 but was postponed to December 2023 so the Hong Kong government can manipulate the law to guarantee the conviction of Mr. Lai.

 

Under Hong Kong’s Constitution, the Basic Law of Hong Kong with the British common law system it preserves, it has long allowed for the participation of foreign lawyers and judges.  However, the Hong Kong government deliberately tried every methods to ensure that Mr. Lai would not get a fair trial.

 

When Mr. Lai asked to have British lawyer, Timothy Owen to represent him, the Hong Kong government objected.

 

In November 2022 Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal ruled that the current law would allow Mr. Owen to represent Mr. Lai.

 

However, Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee refused to accept the court’s rulings and requested Beijing to interpret the National Security Law.  What John Lee did was to make a mockery of the Hong Kong judicial system.  In Hong Kong’s Cantonese colloquial language, it was like asking the Dai Lo (Big Brother of the Mafia Triad) to intervene.   As a result of Beijing’s interpretation, foreign lawyers and judges were barred from participating in national security cases.

 

In March 2024, Hong Kong legislators passed local national security legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law, which grants additional powers to the Chief Executive in appointing judges in national security cases.

 

Further Mr. Lai was not granted a trial by jury which is a fundamental feature of the Basic Law of Hong Kong and Hong Kong’s long standing common law traditions.

 

Most glaringly is that the prosecution’s case which relied on alleged actions and speeches by Mr. Lai that took place prior to June 30, 2020—the date the Hong Kong National Security Law came into effect.

 

This retroactive application of criminal law runs counter to Hong Kong’s Common Law systems and international legal standards—NO CRIME WITHOUT LAW: Individuals should not be prosecuted for conduct that was not criminal at the time it occurred.

 

The case of Mr. Lai is a travesty of justice and should be universally condemned.

 

We therefore call for the immediate and unconditional release of Jimmy Lai.

 

We further urge the United States government to impose sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act on officials responsible for Mr. Lai’s prosecution and sentence.

 

Mr. Lai is a devout Catholic.  Please pray for Jimmy Lai.

 

Submitted by Ann Lau
Chair, Visual Artists Guild

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

WHAT:           Protest the Unjust Conviction of Jimmy Lai
Pleading for Jimmy Lai
WHEN:          Saturday, February 14, 2026
1:00  p.m.
WHERE:       Consulate of the Peoples’ Republic of China
443 Shatto Pl, Los Angeles, CA 90020
(Please note that the address on the poster for LA below is for passport close by)
(For San Francisco, please see poster)
ORGANIZER: US Hongkongers Club