Amber Alert issued for 5-year-old Quebec boy who police say could be in Ontario

Form RCI                                                         

Suspect, boy believed to be travelling in a white Tesla with license plate GVMK 536.

 

Quebec provincial police issued an Amber Alert for a five-year-old boy just before 4 a.m. ET on Tuesday, expanding the alert to Ontario a few hours later.

 

65 years old suspect Ruixue Yang and another female defendant were charged with three counts of kidnapping on the 28th. It is rumored that Yang Ruixue may be the boy’s grandmother and the incident may be a family dispute.

 

 

Police are asking for help in locating Shi Gao Getty, who was taken from the municipality of Brossard on Montreal’s South Shore Monday night.

 

They believe he is travelling in a white 2024 Tesla 3 vehicle registered in Ontario with licence plate GVMK 536.

 

The boy is described as three feet, six inches tall and weighs around 42 pounds. He has brown hair, brown eyes and was last seen wearing a blue T-shirt.

 

 

The Sûreté du Québec (SQ) says its main suspect is 65-year-old Yang Ruixue, who it says is known to the family.

 

It is said that Yang Ruixue once served as a member of the Beijing Municipal People’s Congress.

 

SQ spokesperson Sgt. Benoit Richard says information gathered during the investigation suggests the suspect and child could be in Ontario, possibly heading to the Toronto area.

 

The SQ asked the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) to issue the alert in its region.

 

Feds Alleged Chinese Agent Spied on Fellow Pro-Democracy Activists in NYC for CCP

NY Post                                                            08-26-2024

 

 

A New York City-based Chinese-American pro-democracy activist has been charged with spying on fellow dissidents in New York for the Chinese government, according to an indictment unsealed in Manhattan federal court last week.

 

One of Yuanjun Tang’s alleged marks was a Congressional candidate who was forced to pull out of the race, according to the indictment, claiming at the time he was the victim of a smear campaign.

 

Tang, 67, was arrested after federal prosecutors said he secretly worked for the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS) from 2018 to 2023 and conspired to work as a foreign agent of China without properly registering with US authorities, according to court documents.

 

Tang, a resident of Flushing, is a naturalized American citizen who was imprisoned in China after the deadly 1989 pro-democracy protests in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square.

 

 

Pro-democracy activist Tang,Yuanjun was attended a meeting of pro-democracy activists in Germany in 2007. Photo by Zhang Jing (Photo by Jing Zhang)

 

In 2002, he defected to Taiwan and was then granted political asylum in the US where he has regularly worked with fellow Chinese dissidents.

 

Since moving to the city he has demonstrated against the Chinese government, including in monthly protests in front of the Chinese consulate in Manhattan. However, the complaint charges he has actually been collecting information to send back to the communist Chinese government.

“Specifically, Tang regularly provided information Tang had gathered about individuals and groups viewed by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as potentially adverse to the PRC’s interests, particularly US-based Chinese democracy activists and dissidents [to his handler],” according to court papers.

Among his targets was a Chinese pro-democracy activist who ran for Congress in 2022, court documents say.

 

Xiong Yan, a pro-democracy activist and Iraqi war veteran, ran for Congress in Brooklyn in 2022. But Yan dropped out of the race, exclusively telling The Post at the time he knew he was the victim of spying by unregistered Chinese agents.

 

Yan, a pastor, also said he was the victim of a smear campaign that included setting him up with a prostitute, which left him unable to raise money in his community.

 

The Post first revealed that Chinese spies, working out of an office above a Chinatown noodle shop in Lower Manhattan, were allegedly spying on their own nationals in “Operation Foxhunt.”

 

In addition to the unofficial Chinese police station in the city, there are some 100 clandestine Chinese police stations around the world, according to a report by Safeguard Defenders, a Madrid-based non-profit.

 

Yan Xiong, a student leader at Tiananmen Square, said he knew he was a target of Chinese spying during his aborted campaign for Congress in 2022.Stephen Yang.

 

As part of his alleged espionage work, Tang traveled twice to Macau and once to China between 2019 and 2023 for face-to-face meetings with his handlers, the complaint says.

 

In exchange for cash, Tang provided the Chinese government with information about pro-democracy events in the US, court papers say.

 

In one instance in April 2022, Tang met with an MSS officer who installed his phone with a “bug” that allowed all photos and videos to be transmitted directly to his handlers in China, the complaint says.

 

 

China’s one-child policy hangover: Scarred women dismiss Beijing’s pro-birth agenda

By Joyce Jiang, CNN             08-18-2024

 

Editor’s Note: Sign up for CNN’s Meanwhile in China newsletter which explores what you need to know about the country’s rise and how it impacts the world.

 

Editor’s Note: Sign up for CNN’s Meanwhile in China newsletter which explores what you need to know about the country’s rise and how it impacts the world.

 

A 1980s-era poster in China reads: “To rejuvenate the nation, control the population growth.”  David Pollack/Corbis/Ge  tty Images

 

“What are your parents’ names?”

 

Fang, then a third grader, hemmed and hawed at the simple question as her teacher waited impatiently, unaware the 9-year-old was caught in a dilemma.

 

Since preschool, Fang had been officially registered as the daughter of her eldest uncle – an attempt by her birth parents to circumvent harsh penalties for having a second baby under China’s controversial one-child policy that was enforced from 1980 to 2015.

 

“I really had no idea which parents I was supposed to name,” Fang told CNN years later, using a pseudonym for privacy reasons.

 

Since then, Beijing has gradually lifted the birth caps from one to two children, then to three in 2021, in a bid to arrest a looming demographic crisis.

 

The one-child rules have gone, but the wounds of the past cast long shadows. A new generation of women like Fang, haunted by their parents’ struggles and their own sacrifices as children under the one-child policy, now eye parenthood with reluctance – making Beijing’s current pro-birth push a tough sell.

 

Fang was born in the 1990s – when the one-child limit was at its strictest – and became a big sister just a year later, when her mother “illegally” became pregnant again. To avoid punishment, the family sent Fang to live with extended family members, while her mother pretended her second pregnancy was her first.

 

Fang, now 30 and married, doesn’t want children at all.

“All the fears, drifts and insecurity felt throughout my own childhood have, more or less, played a part in my current call,” she said.

 

Sacrifices of eldest daughters

Keeping their firstborn secret spared Fang’s parents ruinous fines, job loss and even forced abortion and sterilization – the heavy price for having an “unauthorized” second child, another daughter.

Fang was finally allowed to return home at age 10 – but was still registered as her eldest uncle’s daughter and told to “stick with her official registration” whenever she was asked about her parents.

After the one-child policy was dismantled in 2015, Fang’s parents tried for another child. Fang sensed their unstated wish for a son, but her mother gave birth to a girl – her third.

Over 30 years of China’s one-child policy, an estimated 20 million baby girls “disappeared” due to sex-selective abortions or infanticide, according to Li Shuzhuo, director of the Center for Population and Social Policy Research at China’s Xi’an Jiaotong University.

 

A billboard encourages Chinese couples to have only one child in Beijing on January 1, 1983.

Bettmann/Getty Images

 

Twenty-five-year-old Yao, the eldest of three siblings, shared a similar childhood marred by the policy and asked CNN to use only her surname for privacy reasons.

 

She was born in a rural village in northeastern Shandong, one of the 19 provinces that allowed rural couples to have a second child – if their first was a girl – during the single child policy’s reign.

 

This “one-and-a-half child policy” variant, introduced in 1984, reinforced the traditional Chinese preference for sons by implying that girls were worth “half” as much as boys, as noted in a leading Chinese academic study published last year.

 

Yao’s first sibling was a girl – allowed under the policy – but then her mother fell pregnant with a third child – a forbidden one – and soon fled to another village with Yao’s sister, leaving Yao in the care of her grandparents.

 

Yao said her mother was forced to keep her pregnancy secret to avoid a potential forced abortion. But after the “extra baby” arrived, she sought to officially register him as her son – and paid a crushing fine of 50,000 yuan (about $7,000).

 

For Yao, it meant losing her mother’s companionship for nearly a year when she moved out to carry her son to term.

 

“I was only a first grader then and had no one to walk me to and from school,” Yao recalled.

“I felt all alone at that time.”

 

CNN is unable to independently verify Fang’s and Yao’s accounts.

 

From one to three – or none?

 

Since the shift to a three-child policy in 2021, Beijing has been running national campaigns to foster a “pro-birth culture” as China’s population shrinks and grays at an alarming rate.

Posters and slogans once warning of the perils of having more than one child have been replaced with ones encouraging more births. Local governments have rolled out a flurry of policy incentives, from cash handouts and real estate subsidies to the extension of maternity leave.

 

The policy U-turn, from birth limits to birth boost, has left Yao “speechless.”

 

“How ‘well-planned’ the family-planning policy is!” Yao mocked. “(The government) used to slap us for having two (babies) and now expects us to have three?”

 

Fang said she was “somewhat nettled” by Beijing’s initiatives to spur births, arguing: “Having kids or not is purely a woman’s personal choice, not out of any policy, be it a stick or a carrot.”

 

In May, China’s National Health Commission issued a dozen “birth-friendly theme posters” to local bureaus, calling for a “widespread dissemination” from social media to community parks.

The move was met with wry comments online, referencing past one-child slogans like “Fewer kids, happier lives,” and, “If you want to be rich, have fewer children and plant more trees.”

 

A billboard says, “Implement three-child policy and optimize population growth” in Yichang, Hubei province of China, on January 17, 2024.

CFOTO/Future Publishing/Getty Images

 

These chants are not just recounted for ridicule – people have found new resonance with the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s old teachings and are now acting on them earnestly.

 

Last year, the country’s total fertility rate (TFR) – meaning the average number of children a woman delivers during her reproductive years – stood at around 1.0, according to the 2024 China Birth Report from the YuWa Population Research Institute, a China-based think tank.

 

That’s far lower than the 2.1 rate needed to maintain a stable population, or the “replacement rate” in demographic terms, and ranks as the second lowest among the world’s major economies.

 

The birth deficit is even grimmer in China’s richest city, Shanghai, where roughly half of all women do not have children throughout their reproductive periods, based on the city’s 2023 TFR figure (0.6) announced in May.

 

Rock kicked off cliff

 

Yi Fuxian, an expert on China’s demographics at the University of Wisconsin, says the country faces three major obstacles to reversing its shrinking population: low fertility desire, high child-raising costs and a climbing infertility rate.

 

Of these, “the sole challenge Beijing has any capacity to impact is the affordability issue,” Yi said.

 

Last month, the Communist Party proposed boosting incentives, including childbirth subsidies and more affordable childcare, at a key meeting of party leaders.

 

Related videoPeople in China don’t want to have children. Hear why

 

Yet, debt-stricken local governments – including many that are struggling to recover from three years of strict pandemic controls and a loss of revenue from a real estate crash – can only carry them out on a shoestring budget, dooming the party’s birth boost attempt, according to Yi.

 

Chinese state-run media outlet Jiemian reported in early June that the highest childcare subsidies nationwide amount to only 57,800 yuan (about $8,000) – a drop in the bucket for one of the world’s priciest countries to raise kids.

 

The cost of raising a child to age 18 in China is 6.3 times its gross domestic product (GDP) per capita – second only to its neighbor South Korea at 7.79 times, according to a YuWa report.

 

The hefty price tag means some people are putting off parenthood until later in life, when their fertility and openness to child-rearing might be on the wane.

 

“China has fallen into a ‘low-fertility trap’ and the figure will only dip further,” warned Yi.

 

A “low fertility trap” describes a self-reinforcing cycle, where low fertility rates (typically under 1.5) drive population aging and economic stagnation – which further deter childbearing and sink the figure even lower.

 

“China’s fertility rate should have been falling naturally as its economy advances, like a giant rock gradually rolling down along a hillside,” Yi said. “But the one-child policy kicked the rock right down the cliff – it’s extremely hard to lift the rock back now.”

 

‘State violence’

Online discussions in China about childbirth decisions are often dominated by economic concerns, but some have also thrown shade at the country’s one-child policy by sharing decades-old receipts for over-quota birth fines on Xiaohongshu, China’s version of Instagram.

 

“Childbearing isn’t just a financial matter,” said Lü Pin, a prominent Chinese feminist.

 

“Coercive family planning, as a form of state violence, has scarred women deeply … and people just haven’t got over it yet,” added Lü, who’s pursuing a doctorate in women and politics at Rutgers University in the United States.

 

People pose next to a newly renovated statue with two more kids added to the original one-child family design in Hankou Park, Wuhan, in China’s Hubei province on January 5, 2024.

Stringer/AFP/Getty Images

 

Forced abortion and sterilization, arguably the most ghoulish facet of China’s one-child “social engineering,” have left an indelible mark on hundreds of millions of Chinese women, physically and mentally.

 

According to state-owned news outlet The Paper, between 1980 and 2014, 324 million Chinese women were fitted with intrauterine devices (IUDs) and 107 million underwent tubal ligations to prevent pregnancy.

 

Decades after the one-child policy’s introduction in 1980, those contraceptive devices – only meant to remain in women’s bodies for five to 20 years – have long outlived their safe stay.

 

But family planning officials, who once had performance targets to push women to fit IUDs after having their first child, now lack similar incentives to remove those devices in a timely manner, demographer Sun Xiaoming told The Beijing News, a state-linked newspaper.

 

“The government has stretched its hands far enough – even into common folks’ bodies!” Yi said.

 

Lü added that Beijing had not conducted any “open self-reflection, nor even admission (of the state-inflicted trauma).”

 

“Now it expects women to forget all this and embrace its lurch to birth boost? Fat chance.”

 

CNN’s Jessie Yeung, Nectar Gan and Simone McCarthy contributed to this story.

 

 

 

 

 

WRIC’s Photo Exhibition Every Saturday: Records of the CCP’s Massacre of Civilians Atrocities Over the Years

WRIC News                                                08-07-2024

 

After cooperating with the New York Christian Justice Alliance to hold a street education photos exhibition for more than a year, the New York NGO organization ” Women’s Rights in China”(WRIC) independently established a new round of long-term street activity projects to be launched in May 2024, namely in the Chinese community in New York. Dozens of pictures and text display boards – “Records of the CCP’s Massacre of Civilians Atrocities Over the Years” — are displayed in the downtown area of ​​Flushing NY, as well as display boards supported women in prison who were politically persecuted.

Since April 24, the New York-based NGO Women’s Rights in China (WRIC) has independently set up a long-term street activity project, namely, in the downtown area of ​​Flushing, where there is a Chinese community in New York, it exhibited dozens of pictures and texts titled “Record of The CCP’s Atrocities of Massacring Civilians Throughout the Years” and supported women in prison who were politically persecuted.

 

The pictorial exhibition “Record of The CCP’s Atrocities” is set up in sidewalk of the Main Street Flushing Library building. It consists of 21 display boards, each 6 feet tall and 4 feet wide. The exhibition starts with the “Land Reform Movement” in 1949 after the establishment of the CCP and includes 21 major political movements up until the suppression of the 2019 Hong Kong “Anti-Extradition Law Amendment” protests. Each board lists the name, time, location, number of victims, and death toll of each political movement, accompanied by historical photos that vividly illustrate the CCP’s brutal persecution of the Chinese people over the years. Additionally, there are 15 boards featuring female rights activists and political dissenters who are either still in prison or recently released. Examples include He Fangmei and her husband, who were imprisoned for seeking justice for their daughter disabled by a toxic vaccine in 2018, and whose three children were long-term confined in a psychiatric hospital (details at: https://wrchina.https://crchina.live-website.com/wric-protests-detention-and-disappearance-of-he- fangmeis-daughterso); former chairperson of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, Chow Hang-tung, who was charged with multiple crimes against national security in 2019 (details at: https://crchina.live-website.com/international-womens-day-salute-to-hk-female-political-prisoners/ ); and Chinese women’s rights defender Huang Xueqin (details at: https://crchina.live-website.com/who-is-huang-xueqin/https://wrchina.org/archives/16878).

We welcome like-minded friends to join us in our struggle for the rights of Chinese women and children! Unless it rains, we’ll see you there.

 

Every Saturday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM Beside the Flushing Library, Main Street & Kissena Blvd, New York.

 

 

 

 

 

Iran Regime Benefits of Brutal Enforcing Hijab Law 

Written by Baosheng Guo                                    07-20-2024

 

 

In September 2023, Iran’s parliament passed a new “hijab and chastity” bill that lays out punishment for women who violate the country’s mandatory dress code rules. This bill has led to violent enforcement and has acted as a form of gender apartheid, and human rights organizations and Western society have strongly condemned it. Despite a severe economic crisis, Iran’s government has invested almost one billion of dollars to implement and enforce these laws. Why did Iran enforce the hijab law regardless of the financial costs and denouncement by international society? Indeed, there are multiple profound religious, historical, and political reasons.

First, from the conservative Iran authoritarian perspective, female liberation is a significant symbol of Westernization and secularization, so it’s necessary to implement gender taboos and oppression of females.

Photo fome online.Protests grow violent in Iran over death of Mahsa Amini. (ABC News)

Before the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Emperor Pahlavi promoted modernization and Westernization policies in Iran. One policy was to liberate females, including establishing an association for “liberating women from the hijab” in 1935 and issuing a decree known as Kashf-e hijab, banning all veils, including the chador, in 1936. He also declared the date of the decree to be Women’s Liberation Day. Therefore, the hijab and all policies for liberating women act as the symbol of Westernization in Iran’s history and political culture.

Since Khomeini took office, to eliminate and deter Westernization and secularization, the Islamic Republic has implemented a lot of policies restricting female rights and strictly enforced dress codes. Khomeini regime even declared the hijab mandatory for all women from the age of 12. The penalty for not wearing the hijab was up to a year in prison. Now, Iran’s morality police prowl the streets in vans to detain those with “inappropriate” clothing. Government, schools, companies, and all organizations have the responsibility to supervise females’ dress, which causes massive and constant suppression of females.  However, the Islamic Republic thinks that a little bit of progress in female rights and a little bit of increase in female power and social status means the beginning of Westernization and secularization. So, continued pressure on females and allocating power, rights, or economic access along gender lines are a significant guarantee to prevent Westernization. As a result, all females become the scapegoat for the anti-West by the Islamic Republic.

For instance, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Western adversaries of being behind a movement among Iranian women, “Recently, on the pretext of hijab, they have raised the case of women again…Suddenly, the propaganda machine and the…media of the United States and Britain and some other places, and their mercenaries and followers, go on the attack.” From Khamenei’s perspective, Iran’s females and hijab issues are a key part of the Western conspiracy. So, Iran must firmly hold its position and fight back to the West.

In addition, enforcing head-covering laws can strengthen the authority of the Iran regime at home and abroad. Iran is a theocracy state, and it needs to maintain the sacredness of the government, which is its primary legitimacy. So, Iran’s regime was self-claimed as the defender of Islam and devoured to defend the sacredness and purity of the fundamental doctrine of Islam. All fundamentalist cites the Qur’an to justify head-covering laws. Qur’an 33:59 tells Muhammad to ask his family members and other Muslim women to wear outer garments when they go out so that they are not harassed. Therefore, wearing the hijab became the sacred mission of the Iran regime to defend the authority of both Islam and the government. As Fatemeh Haghighatjoo, an Iranian former lawmaker now based in the U.S. as executive director of the Nonviolent Initiative for Democracy, said to Wall Street January,  “The regime thinks if it loses the hijab, it loses its identity,” “They have tied it to their very existence, and then of course, if they relax it, they are going to collapse.”

According to the Selectorate Theory, the authoritarian leader only needs to secure the support of Winning Coalitions to remain in power instead of securing the support of all people. In Iran, The winning coalition included the leaders of religion and the government, and they all are fundamentalists. So, defending the fundamental Islam doctrine is critical to overcoming the trust and support for Winning Coalitions. Any authoritarian leader will spend a massive budget to protect the stability and legitimacy of the regime.  Even though Iran’s economy was declining, after careful calculation of costs and benefits, Iran’s authoritarian regime thought it was reasonable to spend more money on head-covering laws and secure the support of Winning Coalitions.

Furthermore, Iran always thinks of itself as the leader of the Islamic world, and some Iranian politicians want to reestablish a unified Islamic empire. Iran supports almost all Islamic terroristic organizations, such as Hamass, Houthis, and Hezbollah. Iran’s ambition is at the whole MENA, and its followers are all fundamentalists in MENA. To gain an international impact in MENA, Iran must forced to implement head-covering laws to enhance its fundamentalism’s image. In this way, Iran can receive a global reputation and authority. So, Iran spent enormous resources on hijab regardless of costs.

The hijab, a little costume in the West, ultimately became an incredible symbol of religion and politics in Iran. The hijab law also became a horrible symbol of gender apartheid and authoritative suppression. To comprehensively control the females, who are half the population of Iranea, strengthen the dictatorship’s authority at home, and enhance the regime’s international influence, Iran has brutally enforced head-covering laws that outweigh the economic cost. Iran’s atrocities must be strongly condemned by international society and deserve historical justice judgment.

About author:

Baosheng Guo is a Chinese political commentator and dissident. He is also a junior at George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs. His research interests center on Asia, the relationship between the US and China, China politics, the democratic movement in China, and the security of the Taiwan cross-Strait.