His Holiness Teaching “Transcend Suffering”: My Exile Life is Full of Joy

By Jing Zhang of WRIC                                                                    07-05-2025

 

 

In the blink of an eye, His Holiness the Dalai Lama is nearly 90 years old. It has been almost 20 years since I first had the good fortune to meet His Holiness, and he looks not much different from how he appears in TV news today. The two khatas His Holiness bestowed upon me, imbued with love, philosophy, and strength, I cherish permanently and have benefited from them throughout my life.

 

Jing Zhang was fortunate to be blessed by His Holiness the Dalai Lama in 2003.

 

In 1981, I first saw the name of His Holiness the Dalai Lama in a news report in a Macau newspaper. I vaguely remember it was about discussions between Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leaders and the Dalai Lama’s government-in-exile regarding the Tibet issue. At that time, all my understanding of Tibet and Tibetans was what the CCP had instilled: Tibet has been part of China since ancient times, and lamas are “parasites.” I secretly asked myself, if that were the case, why would senior CCP leaders like Hu Jintao go to great lengths to visit Tibetan areas and engage in talks with the “Dalai clique” abroad? Later, I learned that historical facts show Tibet has never been part of China since ancient times; the reason for “negotiations” was that seizing someone else’s homeland was illegitimate; the essence of “negotiations” was like a robber refusing to release hostages while demanding more ransom.

 

Later, the CCP propagated that “the country has reformed and opened up, welcoming all Hong Kong and Macau compatriots to return home to visit relatives and friends, with bygones being bygones.” I naively believed them and returned to China from Macau, a Portuguese colony, only to be sentenced to five years in prison for “counter-revolutionary propaganda and incitement.” After serving my sentence, I managed to go to Hong Kong and received asylum from the British Hong Kong government. During my stay in Hong Kong, I learned more about His Holiness the Dalai Lama. It turned out that His Holiness is not only the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, and a world-class iconic figure, but also a sensitive and forbidden word for the CCP, a world-class important figure who must be censored and silenced.

 

In 1997, after Hong Kong’s sovereignty was handed over to China, I continued my exile, arriving in New York, becoming a true refugee. This allowed me to meet His Holiness the Dalai Lama multiple times. At that time, His Holiness was an elder exile, having been away from his homeland for nearly 50 years. We came from different generations, different ethnicities, different cultural and religious backgrounds, but we were all exiles who had left our homes due to persecution by the CCP. His Holiness’s openness, optimism, and humility deeply moved me, becoming one of the important driving forces that inspired me to overcome homesickness and uphold my conscience throughout the decades of my exile.

 

I once felt lost and frustrated by my exile life, and also depressed, even somewhat melancholic, due to my long-term focus on the suffering of rural Chinese women subjected to forced abortions. Once, my good friend Li Jianglin (author of 1959 Lhasa) told me that the Dalai Lama said, to “break free from the abyss of past suffering, one must first transform the inner self—weakening destructive emotions and strengthening good human nature.” Only then can one maintain infectious compassion and joy.

 

She said, you should listen to the Dalai Lama’s dialogues with psychologists and scientists. His Holiness told people that if you want to help others escape suffering, your emotions cannot follow their suffering and become trapped in it. You must transcend suffering and become an observer to rationally offer help and effectively assist more people. These words benefited me greatly. Soon after, I managed to detach myself from the plight and indignant emotions of women deeply suffering from China’s forced abortion policy. I repeatedly encouraged myself, remembering “only by transcending suffering can one effectively help others,” and ultimately successfully completed the recording, editing, and publishing of five books related to China’s family planning policy, truthfully documenting the stories of Chinese women and families who experienced fatal forced abortions, punitive fines, and even family ruin over nearly 40 years. I did not allow myself to remain in sympathy, empathy, and indignation, but instead sought to find the joy of doing good in daily life.

 

Through transcending suffering and rationally helping others, I understood the positive implications of His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s “Middle Way.” His Holiness, who had experienced catastrophic destruction, proposed the “Strasbourg Proposal” in his 1988 speech to the European Parliament to help his Tibetan compatriots avoid extinction. This proposal involved entrusting defense and foreign affairs to China, not seeking independence, but only seeking genuine autonomy in internal affairs—the “Middle Way.” This seemingly gentle approach is, in fact, a fishbone stuck in the CCP’s throat, sufficient to prevent the CCP from swallowing this nation, from annihilating the Tibetans, and to ensure the snow lion flag flies forever. The “Middle Way” strong-arm has continuously garnered sympathy, attention, and support from the international community. I see that the demand for an independent Tibet, while seemingly rightful, could provide the CCP with an excuse for genocide. In contrast, the “Middle Way” offers more enduring protection and flexibility.

 

Photo taken during a visit to Dharamsala in March 2008. (Photo from WRIC)

 

In 2010, I visited His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s residence in McLeod Ganj, on the outskirts of Dharamsala, India. I also learned more about Buddhist philosophy. His Holiness once said, what is Dharma? Dharma is like a medicine. When people are unwell or suffer from cancer, they need medicine for treatment; but when you are self-righteous, excessively greedy, and morally bankrupt, Dharma is good medicine. These words of wisdom have benefited me throughout my life.

 

With his profound wisdom, His Holiness has led Tibetans from a group of exiles to gradually establish an open, democratically elected government, complete with a robust administrative, legislative, and judicial system. It benefits from oversight by a free media and social services provided by non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Among these, the Tibetan Women’s Association is an organization I greatly admire and commend. They have done extensive social work and actively participated in international humanitarian activities. They are particularly outstanding in promoting women’s political rights, advocating for gender equality, and equal pay for equal work within the Tibetan community.

 

His Holiness was forced to leave his homeland and rebuild a home in Dharamsala, almost 70 years ago now. At 90 years old, the wise leader remains the spiritual head of the Tibetans. His Holiness’s daily life embodies the hope and blessings of the Tibetan people. As a younger generation Han Chinese exile, I sincerely wish His Holiness a long life, as enduring as the Southern Mountains, and hope to have the opportunity to meet him again and continue to benefit from his teachings.

 

Once again, I sincerely wish His Holiness good health and joy!

Jing Zhang

 

 

 

Jing Zhang’s Speech at the 65th UNCSW Forum: The True Situation of Women’s Social Status in China

By Jing Zhang of Women’s Rights in China (WRIC)                                                 03-18-2021

 

 

Editor’s Note: Due to the global pandemic of the Wuhan virus (COVID-19), the 65th session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women panel meeting in 2023 was held via video conference. China Rights founder and CEO Zhang Jing was invited to speak on “The True Situation of Women’s Social Status in China.” The full text of her speech is as follows. (Chinese version: https://wrchina.org/archives/11628 )

 

 

The 2021 Women’s History Month is being observed during the Wuhan virus pandemic, but this cannot halt our focus on the world’s vulnerable populations. Today, we gather online for the 65th UN Women’s Forum, with our focus remaining on the rights of women and girls. Here, I will share with you the true situation of women’s rights and status in China, as well as the root causes of the increasingly severe discrimination against women in China, hoping to provide the world with a more comprehensive understanding of China.

 

 

.1. No Women in the Top Tier of the Chinese Communist Party in 100 Years

 

In the 100-year history of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) since its founding, no woman has ever been among the members of the Politburo Standing Committee, which holds the highest decision-making power. Only six women have been able to enter the Politburo, the second tier of the CCP’s decision-making circle, and three of them are the wives of the country’s president and premier. This gender-imbalanced political participation is one of the main reasons for the deprivation of women’s rights in China. For a long time, the formulation and implementation of CCP policies and laws have been controlled by a few male Politburo Standing Committee members. For example, the national policy of forced birth control, the One-Child Policy: in the early 1950s, the CCP encouraged women to have more children due to a shortage of soldiers after the war; for 40 years after the 1970s, women were forced to undergo birth control through inhumane means to ensure each family had only one child; in the 2010s, it was said that one or two children were allowed; and in the current stage of the 2020s, women are being vigorously encouraged and forced to have more children for the country. These laws and regulations, which control women’s wombs and the life and death of infants, are all decided by a few men in the Politburo Standing Committee of the successive CCP’s top leadership.

 

In the Chinese government’s propaganda, beautiful and healthy female images often appear, portraying them as intelligent, confident, and living freely amidst various challenges. However, the latest data reveals the true picture of discrimination against Chinese women. The World Economic Forum’s “Global Gender Gap Report 2020” ranked China 106th out of 153 countries, even lower than the status of women in some extremely impoverished areas of Africa. In 2015, Xi Jinping donated $10 million to UN Women and obtained the opportunity to speak at the opening ceremony of the gender equality meeting held at the UN World Women’s Summit in September of the same year. However, just a few months before he went to the UN to talk about equality to the world’s women, the Xi Jinping government arrested the “Feminist Five,” who were peacefully holding placards against sexual harassment, in order to silence dissenting voices among Chinese women. The situation of women’s rights in China under Xi Jinping’s rule is deteriorating year by year, and the social injustices and gender discrimination faced by Chinese women are becoming more widespread and prevalent.

 

 

Life: Women’s Rights in China (WRIC) and other women’s rights groups supported the five women’s rights activists in front of the UN in 2015. (Photo by WRIC)

Right: In September 2015, Zhang Jing and WRIC members protested in front of the United Nations in New York against Xi Jinping’s suppression of feminists while delivering a speech at the UN Women’s Summit. (Photo by WRIC)

 

 

 

II. Sexual Assault and Rape Cases Evolving into Social Structural Crimes

 

In recent years, although the Western Me Too movement has also swept into major Chinese cities, almost all Chinese Me Too victims have not been able to pursue court litigation due to economic reasons or intimidation. Most of them only complain online or remain silent. In March 2020, a Chinese blogger named @梁钰stacey posted a survey on female sexual assault, which received 45,000 votes in just a few days, with over 85% of women admitting to having experienced sexual harassment or assault, and thousands sharing their stories. Cases of women being sexually harassed by male colleagues or superiors and then being dismissed after complaining to higher-ups are common. A report submitted to the World Health Organization by a professor named Xiang Ming pointed out that about 11.5% of girls and 9.6% of boys in China are sexually abused, meaning at least 20 million children in China are sexually abused each year. Legal researcher Tian Gang pointed out that at least 21% of Chinese women have been raped, with marital rape cases reaching 24.7%. These data are all officially released; the unpublished data is believed to be even more alarming.

 

The situation of left-behind children, whose parents work in cities and live with their grandparents for many years, is very serious, with them being raped or gang-raped by relatives or older men in the village. The perpetrators are often influential village cadres or their relatives, and even if the victims’ parents come forward, it is difficult to file charges. These cases usually only attract a brief period of online attention and then fade away. In primary and secondary schools, cases of minors being collectively sexually assaulted or induced into prostitution by teachers are serious crimes that have been ongoing for many years. The government has not increased efforts to effectively punish the perpetrators, making these teachers, who are beasts in human clothing, act with impunity. Wang Yu, a Chinese lawyer who recently received the U.S. State Department’s 2021 International Women of Courage Award, once joined several feminists in holding a “If you want to open a room, find me, leave the children alone” protest in Hainan Province, which was in response to six elementary school girls being taken to a hotel and raped by their principal.

 

In 2013, feminist Ye Haiyan and lawyer Wang Yi held a sign in front of Wanning Primary School in Hainan to support six little girls who were raped. The sign read, “Principal, come to me to get a room, and leave the little girls alone.” (Internet photo)

 

 

A foreign-born male chauvinist culture, PUA (Pick-up Artist), has found fertile ground in China’s local male chauvinist environment, and has flourished with a vengeance, showing the misogyny and myths of sexual violence in a male chauvinist society. The PUA culture, which is considered misogynistic in Western countries and is rapidly declining, has grown rapidly in China, a hotbed of rape culture, in recent years. A PUA company called “Langji” had more than 400 employees and 100,000 paying members in 2017 alone; another PUA company called “Paoxue.com” had nearly 2 million members by 2018. This online course, which specializes in psychological and spiritual humiliation, and occasional seduction and rape of women, costs as much as 10,000 to tens of thousands of yuan per course, yet it is still flooded with those who fantasize about sexual violence. This makes it easy to understand why Chinese officials like Lai Xiaomin would have more than a hundred mistresses and still not be satisfied, or why powerful figures like Zhao Liping and Wang Huaizhong would kill their girlfriends in broad daylight.

 

In September 2020, a 60-year-old man named Xu from Leizhou City, Zhanjiang raped an 8-year-old left-behind girl from his neighborhood. Her 11-year-old brother took a picture of the incident, and the picture of the girl being sexually assaulted went viral on the Internet. A few months ago, the victim’s parents had called the police to accuse Xu of sexually assaulting their child, but the police said there was no evidence and did not file a case. In fact, the girl had been raped for two or three years. (Internet picture)

 

 

III. Sexual Abuse in Detention Centers Evolving into Systemic Government Crimes

 

Sexual assault and rape in China have evolved from individual crimes to collective and systemic criminal culture. Rape crimes have evolved into different forms at different levels, and have also developed from individual behavior to organized criminal patterns within the government system, especially in prisons and other places where women are forcibly concentrated.

 

In the 1980s, I personally witnessed male prison guards raping female inmates in a women’s prison in Guizhou. They were often taken away by prison guards for “separate labor,” and when they returned to the cell, they were exhausted and dared only to cry quietly. Those who privately discussed or revealed secrets would be publicly criticized, physically punished, or have their sentences extended. Later, a large number of female Falun Gong practitioners who were detained revealed that they had been sexually assaulted and subjected to organ harvesting. More recently, the sexual assault and rape of female prisoners in the Masanjia Women’s Labor Camp in Shenyang has been exposed. Over the decades, the systemic rape culture in places where women are imprisoned has gone from being relatively hidden to being open sexual crime.

 

The systemic rape or assault of women who have lost their freedom is not only rampant in mainland China but also spreading to its border regions.

 

In Xinjiang’s “re-education camps,” which hold 2 million people, Uyghur women are not only forced to sing and dance for Han Chinese administrators but also subjected to gang rape and rape. Several women who escaped from Uyghur “re-education camps” have spoken to the media about their experiences and what they saw and heard. Tursunay Ziawudun told reporters about her nine-month ordeal in the camps: masked men in suits repeatedly raped her in a dark room without surveillance cameras. Women in the camps were taken from their cells every night and raped by one or more masked Han Chinese men. She herself was tortured three times and gang-raped, each time by two or three men. Ms. Ziawudun is one of the very few victims who have been able to escape, and many more have not had the opportunity to tell their stories to the outside world. The facts that have been revealed also include the CCP’s population control of Uyghurs and its forced birth control policies for Uyghur women.

 

In Uyghur communities in Xinjiang, after the men in the families are taken to “re-education camps,” the wives and children are usually left at home. At this time, a Han Chinese “cadre” is often assigned by his superiors to live in the family, which is a method of the CCP’s “pairing and befriending” program. In recent years, the CCP has sent 1 million Han Chinese people into Uyghur families, appearing as civilians, to complete 24-hour precise monitoring of Uyghurs.

 

Tursunay Ziawudun, a Uyghur woman, tells her story in an interview with a BBC reporter.

(Screenshot from BBC)

 

In 2019, a Uyghur woman who escaped from a Xinjiang education camp to Taiwan was interviewed by Taiwan’s CTS News. She talked about her experience of being sexually assaulted and tried to hold back tears several times. (Screenshot from CTS News)

 

 

In Hong Kong, some young female protesters who opposed the government’s amendment to the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance have also been subjected to varying degrees of sexual harassment, sexual violence, and even rape by the police after being arrested. Even more appalling is the case of a 15-year-old girl who participated in the anti-extradition bill “street walk” (a phrase from Chen Yanlin’s last video) and was found naked and floating in a bay a few days after she disappeared. This vocational school girl, who was a good swimmer, was found floating in the sea in September 2019, at the height of the anti-extradition bill movement. In September 2020, under the pressure of the CCP’s National Security Law, the Hong Kong court only dared to rule that the girl’s “cause of death was suspicious,” and the case was closed, allowing the criminals to go unpunished. During arrests, Hong Kong police took the opportunity to grope and grab young girls’ bodies, some of which were accidentally captured on video or photos, but in most cases, no one saw what happened, or the criminal police officers thought they were in hidden corners, and the victims could not leave evidence.

 

A girl arrested during a counter-protest march in Hong Kong in 2020 was repeatedly grabbed and pinched on her private parts by police. (Hong Kong photo)

 

A girl arrested during a counter-protest march in Hong Kong in 2020 was sexually harassed by the police. (Hong Kong photo)

A 15-year-old girl who died of “suspicious causes” (Internet photo)

 

 

 

IV. Severe Workplace Discrimination, Blatant Everywhere

 

In the past 40 years, China’s economic growth has benefited men more than women, but women’s average income is still far lower than men’s. A Chinese recruitment platform said in its “2020 Report on Gender Pay Gap in Chinese Workplaces” that they tracked the salary ratios of urban employees in China for the five years leading up to 2020 and found that women’s salaries were only about 70% of men’s; the longer the seniority, the greater the gap between men’s and women’s salaries. This shows that women still face severe workplace discrimination, whether in university admissions, industry recruitment, or even civil service recruitment. According to Human Rights Watch, 11% of the positions in the Chinese government’s 2020 national civil service examination job list were limited to male applicants or prioritized male applicants, while in the 2018 and 2019 job lists, male-preferred or male-only positions accounted for 19%. China Rights has received complaints from many women in China about unfair treatment in job applications, including being required to sign a contract with the recruiter stating that they cannot become pregnant for at least five years when applying for journalism positions. Workplace injustice is so prevalent in cities, and it is even worse for female migrant workers from rural areas, whose income is 20% lower than male workers for the same amount of labor.

 

According to a sample survey of female migrant workers in private enterprises in 18 provinces by the Women Workers’ Department of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, 29.6% of female employees in the chemical building materials industry were assigned work that was prohibited during pregnancy; 98% had no maternity insurance, and 72% had no medical insurance.

 

Data from China’s official All-China Women’s Federation shows that 22% of Chinese women believe that gender discrimination in employment is severe, and 59% of women believe that there is general gender discrimination in employment. A private “2020 Survey Report on the Status of Chinese Women in the Workplace” shows that 58.25% of women have been “asked about their marital and fertility status during the interview process,” 27% of women have encountered recruiters who limit job positions to men, 8.02% of women have experienced “workplace sexual harassment,” and 6.39% of women have been “transferred or demoted during their marriage and childbirth period.” It is worth noting that these surveys are officially allowed to be released to the public, and the actual data is much more severe than what can be published.

 

Discrimination not only occurs in the workplace; it appears in every corner of society. A court judge’s verdict reflects the blatant discrimination and bullying of women by male chauvinist society, from government law enforcement officials to the general public. In March 2021, a “blackmail case” in Jiangsu Province was shocking. A single woman had sexual relations with nine officials in five years, and the judge sentenced the woman to 13 years in prison, confiscating 3.726 million yuan and fining her 5 million yuan, which she had “blackmailed” from the nine men. In this case, the nine married men and superiors all became victims. The government profited 8.7 million yuan from the girl, and the girl was “prostituted” and sentenced to 13 years in prison. This verdict will encourage powerful officials to play with and sexually abuse women with impunity.

 

In addition, “naked loans” are prevalent in China, with loan companies colluding with gangs to conduct large-scale sexual abuse and usury targeting young female college students, covering tens of thousands of university and high school campuses across China. Poor students from rural areas cannot afford the high living and tuition costs in cities and cannot obtain financial support from government departments, so they turn to underground loans. Female students must take photos and videos of themselves holding their ID cards and performing erotic actions specified by the lenders as collateral for the loans. Once the principal and interest are overdue, the loan companies will publish the girls’ nude photos, videos, and personal information online, or the girls will be raped, gang-raped, and forced into prostitution to repay the debts, and some girls will commit suicide as a result. China Rights obtained electronic files in 2018-2019 that documented the sexual abuse of nearly 100 girls who took out loans from gangs, as well as their nude photos and videos. Considering the prevalence of collusion between the police and gangs in China, we, as an NGO, do not have the ability to ensure that the girls will not be subjected to secondary harm, so we have not published any victim interviews. Due to the Wuhan virus pandemic and public condemnation, the “naked loan” industry has shifted from public to hidden. In September 2020, the Ningbo police in Zhejiang Province released a naked loan case, which included 3TB of girls’ information and “naked loan” videos.

 

In June 2016, loan company staff publicly placed advertisements to recruit college students and promote “Jiedaibao” near the Wuhan University campus.

 

 

The borrower must take a photo and video of herself holding her ID card and her naked body, and then send it to the lender via mobile phone. (Online pictures)

 

The borrower must take a photo and video of herself holding her ID card and her naked body, and then send it to the lender via mobile phone. (Picture from Zhihu.com)

 

 

VI. Domestic Violence and Female Suicide are Commonplace

 

Data from China’s official All-China Women’s Federation shows that about 25% of the 270 million families in China experienced domestic violence in 2019; 157,000 women in China commit suicide each year, 60% of which are due to domestic violence. A woman in China is abused every 7.4 seconds; victims report to the police after being abused an average of 35 times; domestic violence accounts for more than 40% of female homicides; and most perpetrators of domestic violence are men. A semi-official Chinese women’s rights organization pointed out that in the more than 600 days from March 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017, there were 533 domestic violence deaths in China, including 635 adult and child deaths, an average of more than one domestic violence death per day, most of whom were women.

 

Since China’s divorce rate is alarmingly high, the new “Civil Code” in China in 2020 added a 30-day “divorce cooling-off period,” which is particularly unfair to women, as it may cause victims of domestic violence to suffer more violence or even death threats during the 30-day “cooling-off period.” A young Tibetan woman, Ram, who lived in a Tibetan rural area in Aba Prefecture, Sichuan Province, was killed in September 2020 when her ex-husband, who was prone to domestic violence, broke into her house with a knife and gasoline, poured gasoline on her, and died from severe burns two weeks later. She had been subjected to domestic violence for a long time and had repeatedly reported it to the police without success and without court protection.

 

Photo of Ram before his death. (Internet photo)

 

The world average male suicide rate is 25% higher than the female suicide rate, but China was once the country with the highest female suicide rate in the world, especially the suicide rate of female farmers, which was 60% higher than the male suicide rate. Scholars believe that the main reason for the decline in China’s high female suicide rate is economic reform and urbanization, which has kept female farmers away from the large amounts of deadly pesticide “omethoate” stored in every household. However, a serious problem is now at hand: when female migrant workers are driven back to the countryside by the government and return to their hometowns, where they have easy access to deadly pesticides, will the suicide rate reach a new peak?

 

The harm caused to migrant workers by the low-human-rights, low-cost economic development model that maintains high growth is borne primarily by rural women and children in China. In recent years, the Chinese government has determined that urban construction has become saturated and that the temporary use of cheap labor from migrant workers has been exhausted. Therefore, driving migrant workers back to their hometowns is the CCP’s established policy. In 2017, Beijing launched the most intense campaign to expel migrant workers in history. Under the pretext of a “fire,” the government destroyed the homes of more than 10,000 migrant workers and their families, whom the mayor of Beijing called “low-end population,” overnight, and entire neighborhoods were razed to the ground. Women and children cried helplessly on the streets, like scenes from a war. Since then, Beijing has had no migrant workers, only the beautiful city buildings built by migrant workers and city dwellers with urban household registration.

 

During the 2020 Wuhan virus pandemic, governments in major cities, under the pretext of controlling the epidemic, cruelly forced hundreds of millions of migrant workers and their families to return to the countryside, to their hometowns where only barren land remained. This is bound to be a new nightmare for rural women in China, who once had the world’s highest suicide rate. Unemployment, discrimination, helplessness, and the fact that they have missed their childbearing years after working in cities for many years, even if they are allowed to have children, the 70’s generation of women who cannot bear children for their husbands, will they inevitably return to the past of “a mouthful of pesticide and a clean break”? It is foreseeable that the suicide problem will become more serious. Without unemployment benefits, basic medical subsidies, or psychological counseling, coupled with the impact of the 2020 Wuhan virus pandemic, rural women’s living conditions for maintaining their families are even worse. The Chinese government turns a blind eye to the seriousness of the consequences and has no corresponding measures to prevent women’s suicide.

 

The cold wind in Beijing’s Daxing District overnight evacuated the homes of “low-end population” farmers, which reminded people of the areas destroyed by war. (Photo by Bryan Denton)

 

 

 

VII. Conclusion: Systemic Harm to Women

 

Scholars attribute China’s high female suicide rate to three main factors, also known as the three Cs: Communism, Confucianism, and Commercialism. I believe that commercialism is fundamentally not a major cause of suicide, especially for Chinese people who are accustomed to poverty, and there are few historical examples of people choosing to end their lives due to poverty. The 40-year-long forced birth control policy and the systemic policy and legal failures and crimes of the communist regime are the root causes of the resurgence of dregs in traditional culture, which has further lowered the social status of Chinese women, who are already heavily discriminated against, and led to their high suicide rate.

 

In Beijing’s little-known “China Women and Children’s Museum,” there is not a single exhibit of various contraceptives and drug samples that have subjected three generations of Chinese women to forced birth control; there is no data, stories, photos, or videos about the personal injuries and family deaths suffered by hundreds of millions of Chinese women in the national birth control policy, let alone the stories and records of 40 million fetuses who were forced to abort. The 40-year history of blood and tears, the largest massacre in human history, will quietly disappear from the Chinese mainland after the opening of the two-child policy, as if it never happened! It’s like the generation born in the 80s and 90s, who don’t even know about the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989. Covering up the truth of history with lies, suppressing human rights, and cracking down on those who tell the truth to achieve a balance of terror and divert public opinion are their most prominent skills.

 

Since taking office, Xi Jinping has called on Chinese women to be virtuous wives, “to take the initiative to assume the responsibility of educating children and taking care of their husbands in the family…” As a result, all walks of life in China, especially the education sector, have begun to vigorously promote traditional cultural garbage such as the “Tao Te Ching” and “Daughter’s Scripture,” which imprison people’s minds and discriminate against women, redefining women as housewives. These “feudal historical and cultural products,” which were once thrown into the eighteenth level of hell by Mao Zedong, have been brought out again by Xi Jinping as spiritual opium. Weakening women’s self-confidence and social roles helps the CCP stabilize its regime. Xi Jinping’s government’s severe crackdown on women who dare to stand up for their rights has made the male chauvinist social pattern more complete, and the living space for women’s rights has become narrower. The extremely small number of urban women’s rights advocates are mostly limited to expressing their demands through sporadic performance art and on the heavily censored internet. The road to women’s rights in China is bleak.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due to the global pandemic of the Wuhan virus (COVI-19), the 65th UN Commission on the Status of Women panel meeting in 2021 was held via online video. The screenshot shows Zhang Jing speaking on behalf of Chinese Women’s Rights through an interpreter.

 

 

 

 

The Harm of the CCP’s Infiltration to Overseas Democracy Movement: Jing Zhang

By Jing Zhang      WRIC                                          09-23-2024

 

 

Editor’s note: Jing Zhang’s speech on the issue of some Chinese exiles becoming CCP agents at the “Future China Forum” in Washington DC on September 23, 2024

 

Democracy is a lofty ideal; the democratic movement is a series of actions to realize this ideal. We, the exiled democracy activists, are a group of activists from different families and educational backgrounds, with different motivations for participation, but who have reached a basic consensus and formed various groups. Every participant, especially the organizers, promotes the values ​​of democracy, freedom and human rights through speeches, articles and various self-media platforms. While seeking recognition from others, they also declare their own commitments and expectations. These are great motivations to encourage others to actively participate in overthrowing the CCP’s tyranny.

 

 

Jing Zhang gave a speech at the “Future China Forum” in Washington DC on September 23, 2024。

 

Recently, several leaders of Chinese dissident groups in exile have been prosecuted by judicial institutions in Europe and the U.S., accused of acting illegally as foreign agents or spies for the Chinese Communist Party. This has shocked and frustrated all involved in the democracy movement, causing significant harm and a credibility crisis for our overseas efforts.

 

New participants who have gone through untold hardships to pursue democracy and freedom suddenly discovered that the leader of their organization turned out to be a CCP informant and spy; old democracy activists also suddenly discovered that their old comrades who had experienced the same imprisonment and exile as them, and who had held protests and condemned tyranny together, had lost their integrity in their later years and became tools for the CCP to infiltrate. Once upon a time, we spent the Mid-Autumn Festival together to comfort each other’s homesickness; we went on outings with our families together. We were comrades-in-arms and friends. But it was these “friends” who, without our knowledge, secretly handed over all our information (as long as the CCP wanted it) to the CCP’s secret police in exchange for their own interests. Our political views, family situations, and personal likes and dislikes expressed in public events, private gatherings, or casual conversations may become the price they pay to the CCP’s national security to seek credit and reward. Tang Yuanjun, former chairman of the New York Democratic Party, Wang Shujun, founding secretary general of the “Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang Memorial Foundation”, Guo Jian, former director of the German Democratic Front, and others are such a group of trash who harmed their comrades and friends and betrayed their conscience.

 

Let’s not talk about the distant past, let’s talk about the two prosecuted CCP agents in New York who we know.

 

We are not surprised that Wang Shujun was found to have worked for the Chinese Communist Party’s intelligence agencies for many years, because Wang Shujun has been actively participating in the activities and gatherings of top anti-communist democracy activists overseas for a long time, while freely traveling between China and the United States. His organization and activities are not affected at all. This has long been criticized in our democracy movement circle, and everyone knows it tacitly, but some people are embarrassed to say it, and some people cover it up for the sake of covering up.

 

In May 2017, Wang Shujun received the “World Chinese Outstanding Talent Award” awarded by the “World Chinese Investment Foundation” and the Chinese Communist Party’s official media “Wen Wei Po” in Hong Kong. It’s funny that almost no one in our circle knew what kind of special and outstanding talents Wang Shujun had among the Chinese people in the world. Even the pro-communist overseas Chinese groups and leaders in New York didn’t know who Wang Shujun was at the time. It wasn’t until Li Jinjin, the president of the “Memorial Hu Zhao Foundation”, was killed in 2022 that Wang Shujun was prosecuted as an illegal agent of the Chinese Communist Party. He became famous. We have also confirmed our suspicions. His ironclad criminal facts are disgusting.

 

What confuses new democracy activists is not that Wang Shujun was convicted of four crimes, but that some democracy activists said that the content of the report Wang Shujun passed to the Chinese Communist Party intelligence personnel was public and they did not feel hurt. Some people also defended Wang Shujun’s behavior. Perhaps they cannot distinguish the boundary of criminal behavior regulated by American law, or perhaps they are used to being hurt and have become a little numb. In other words, we, the democracy activists, do not have the ability to remove the blood-sucking leeches that have long been infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party and tightly attached to our bodies. The US law enforcement agencies have helped us remove them, but some people actually say that they do not feel that the leeches attached to their bodies are harmful.

 

So far, the “harmlessness theory” in the democracy movement circle has become very popular, leaving supporters and new participants confused and unable to distinguish right from wrong. Wang Shujun violated many U.S. laws and disrupted the public order that the public must abide by. This is an offense to both Americans and Chinese living in the United States, not to mention that we ourselves are the direct offenders or victims. Injury is not necessarily just physical injury, but also mental injury and damage to rights. It is precisely because our basic rights such as personal privacy have been damaged that Wang Shujun and his ilk can travel between China and the United States and receive medals and bonuses issued by the CCP.

 

For many years, there has always been some confusion of principles within our democracy movement on major issues of right and wrong.

 

For example, when the Tiananmen Square massacre murderers did not apologize or pay compensation, student leaders who escaped from China early on took the lead in launching the “forgiveness theory” in the United States to forgive Deng Xiaoping, Li Peng and other murderers. Although they may not have ulterior motives to deliberately blur the focus of the essence, and they should not deliberately curry favor with the criminals, such cognition is enough to cause confusion in the thoughts and the bottom line of right and wrong among the democracy activists, making it easier and more unscrupulous for the CCP to infiltrate, alienate and disintegrate the democracy movement organizations.

 

Mr. Wang Dan recently made a direct clarification on Ms. Dai Qing’s remarks that confused right and wrong and portrayed Deng Xiaoping as a leader with democratic ideas, so that the younger generation can understand the truth, distinguish right from wrong, and not be misled. Wang Dan’s timely restoration of historical right and wrong is a responsible act and is worth promoting.

 

Unlike Wang Shujun, Tang Yuanjun was once our fellow traveler, comrade-in-arms and friend. From the moment he jumped into the cold waters of the Taiwan Strait, he knew that he was on a road of no return. He knew that his parents would grow old and his brother would have difficulty walking. He had already made a well-thought-out choice between pursuing his own ideals and fulfilling his family responsibilities. In New York, Tang Yuanjun became a leader of the democracy movement. He promised to uphold his ideals, resist the tyranny of the Chinese Communist Party, and encourage and call on the party members they organized to overthrow the authoritarian regime of the Chinese Communist Party.

 

Around 2014, Tang Yuanjun changed from agreeing with violent revolution to overthrow the CCP to an extreme advocate of “peaceful, rational and non-violent”. In his view, the democracy movement must reflect every day, and adhering to “peaceful, rational and non-violent” is the only way out for China. He never forgets to remind people at every democracy movement meeting, even at friends’ gatherings, that we must reflect and “be peaceful, rational and non-violent”. It has become his motto, and he speaks it casually. For this reason, I have repeatedly asked Tang Yuanjun: When should we reflect? When has the democracy movement ever been violent? Why don’t you say “peaceful, rational and non-violent” to the CCP?

 

In the end, the fact we see is that Tang Yuanjun not only betrayed his ideals and promises, deceived many party members, betrayed his comrades and friends, but also betrayed his wife (divorced this year). It is unclear whether Tang’s wife, who was then a staff member of the US Congressional and Executive Committee on China (CECC), also became the price tag for Tang to obtain benefits from the CCP.) Tang Yuanjun’s disorderly life is believed to have made him an easy target for the CCP. This cannot be covered up by just the word “homesickness”.

 

From a tolerant perspective, even if he cannot discipline himself, breaks his promise, has no spirit of responsibility, and chooses to withdraw from the democratic movement, we can still consider him to have some basic conscience as a human being. However, this is not the case.

 

Over the past few decades, many exiled democracy activists have been allowed to return to China for various reasons, such as homesickness or mourning. Some have been invited to tea or forced to kneel briefly after writing a letter of guarantee not to speak out against CCP.

 

After returning to the United States, some of them have withdrawn from the democracy movement circle on their own; some have been vague but eventually disappeared. These are still considered to be people with conscience. At least they no longer harm their fellow activists. We can understand and forgive them. Of course, there are also those who use personal social platforms and the media to sing praises for the CCP in various ways.

 

However, when their phased tasks are completed, they generally leave the democracy movement. The few long-term latent professional agents are another matter. If Tang Yuanjun took the risk only because he was homesick, at least after returning to the United States, he should not continue to accept the instructions of the Chinese National Security Bureau to do things that go against his conscience, and should not use his identity as a leader of the democracy movement as a cover, and continue to use the public or private personal information of his colleagues and hundreds of party members before and after as bargaining chips with the Chinese National Security Bureau. There are not many cases like Tang Yuanjun who shamelessly used his identity as a leader of the democracy movement to do things for the CCP until he was exposed by the FBI.

 

More importantly, Tang Yuanjun committed a crime of conscience and morality that is unforgivable. In the case of Tang Yuanjun, regardless of whether he is convicted or sentenced to a long or short sentence in the future, his moral responsibility is much greater than the legal responsibility, and it is difficult to forgive him easily.

 

Some people say that murderers can be forgiven, so why can’t Tang be forgiven?

 

Even from God’s perspective, anyone and anything in the world can be forgiven conditionally, not to mention that we are mortals and can only judge whether a person’s behavior can be forgiven according to the laws and morals in real society.

 

Legally, there are juries to judge and judges to sentence; while the moral court is in everyone’s heart, making decisions according to the socially agreed value judgments and moral bottom line. Tang Yuanjun cheated and betrayed again and again, and cheated and betrayed again. If he hadn’t been caught, it is unknown how many times and for how many years he would have continued. Tang Yuanjun betrayed his promise and conscience, and affected and hurt multiple organizations and an entire group. This is of course different from a murderer. In addition to violating the law, Tang Yuanjun has a greater moral responsibility. He owes a debt of conscience and must be judged by the moral court.

 

As a participant in the Chinese democracy movement who has been in exile abroad for decades, I believe that many of you here, like me, have experienced the pain of wanting to return to China to visit your elderly parents or to see your loved ones for the last time before they leave.

 

However, faced with the unreasonable demand that you must shut up if you want to go back, we all made the right choice: where there is freedom, there is home. I would rather suffer than be a dog with a broken spine. We have regrets and owe our families, but in the end we kept our conscience, resisted the deception of the evil Chinese Communist regime, and fulfilled our promises and expectations. After experiencing the hardships of life, we still sail freely in the ocean of our hearts, trying our best to fulfill our promises and never losing our way. The reward for decades is a life of peace of mind, and our glory lies in the ordinary.

 

The Chained Woman’s Trafficking has never cut off in China

WRIC: Jing Zhang              9-17-2022

 

The chained woman was kept in a cabin for 24 years by a man who claimed to be her husband. She had few teeth, was raped, gang-raped, and gave birth to eight children.

In the five investigation reports by the local government, officials kept saying that no cases of abduction and trafficking were found, that the chained woman was an orphan, that she was mentally ill and needed to be restrained, and that periodontitis was what caused her teeth to fall out. This aroused strong doubts from netizens, as villagers had revealed that her kidnappers had her teeth pulled out because she bit her rapist. Since then, the village has been cut off from the outside world. Local police and officials have remained silent for at least 24 years.

 

WRIC’s anti-trafficking vehicle is covered with pictures of missing children. (Photo by WRIC 2012)

 

 

 

Some who tried to find out the truth were harassed and threatened by police, including a woman who was detained twice and later placed under residential surveillance.

Ten years ago, our organization Women’s Rights in China reported similar tragic stories of young women being kidnapped, sold, and imprisoned.

One case we found was that of Deng Lurong, who was kidnapped when she was 13 years old. When our organization’s volunteers went to her in 2012, she was 19, had been raped, gang-raped, and had already given birth to 4 children(one of dead least) . A female villager said their husbands would “slip away” any time and it drove them crazy. When the volunteers called the police, the police did nothing.

To put it simply, there are three main factors behind the rampant trafficking crimes of women and girls in China.

The first is the negative impact of the nearly 40-years One Child Policy. The cultural preference for boys resulted in a severe imbalance between males and females, with a male to female ratio of 120 to 100.

Secondly, a lot of male farmers in poor and backward areas rely on buying, robbing, or kidnapping to get a wife.

Thirdly, Society is still influenced by the traditional culture where men are superior to women.

In the process of abducting and selling women and girls, local township government departments are all accomplices in this complex chain of interests and profit. For example, traffickers pay off officials or entice officials to engage in gang rape.

Currently in China, the tragedy of abuse, forced slavery and trafficking continues. And it extends from poor areas in China to poor areas in small Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam and Laos.

The Chinses Gov. Report of Tangshan Assault on Girls is Full of Holes

Author: WRIC Jing Zhang                                  2022-08-31

 

On August 29, the Hebei Provincial Procuratorate released a report on the investigation and prosecution of the Tangshan Barbecue Restaurant involving criminal cases involving local gangsters. China Central Television broadcasted a video of a reporter interviewing one of the victimized girls with her back turned. Hundreds of millions of Chinese have been waiting for nearly three months for the investigation report on the case of sexual harassment and assault. Unsurprisingly, it’s another a big lie like the five investigation reports on the “Chain woman” case in Xuzhou in 2022, it is full of holes.

 

The report on the investigation of the Tangshan case and the video shown by CCTV did not focus on the definition of gang violence that took place after sexual harassment, nor did they explain to the public about any detail of the physical recovery of the four victimized women, the degree of impact on their lives and work, and other serious effects. The official statement did not mention the scope of the criminal law provisions and the scope of civil compensation liability involved in the personal injury suffered by the four people. The investigation is more like a publication of staged result after the suppression done by the local officials, that is, the destruction of a huge black den and gang supported by local political forces that do not obey the command of the central government. 28 people were prosecuted. As we know over the years, there has never been a major or important case of “cracking down on gangsters” in China that did not involve local political forces.

 

On June 10, 2022, the scene where 4 women were besieged. (Online picture)

 

However, the case of beating the four women and the publicity of the official media did not mention sexual harassment a single time, from the beginning to the end. The fact of sexual harassment was completely covered up. The four injured women then disappeared without a trace. The public doesn’t know whether any of them was beaten to death. It was unknown whether they accrued real injuries or receive any form of compensation at all.

 

In the video released by CCTV, the female victim XX Wang, showing the back of her head, was asked by the reporter: Online posts said that the victims were sexually assaulted in a small alley, thrown from upstairs, and ran over by a car. Do you happen to know anything? The female victim said: No (Did she dare to say yes!). So, the CCP party media, official media, and even social media condemned the rumors all over the country: sexual assault, being run over by a car, and being thrown downstairs are all rumors. However, anyone who has watched the 11-minute interview video and possess a slight critical thinking knows that when the victim girl surnamed Wang was beaten brutally, how could she care to see what happened to others? Even if other women were raped by gang, thrown downstairs or run over by a car, she would not be able to see them at all. Not to mention a woman was gang-raped and dragged up to the second floor, and the victim surnamed Wang was beaten in the downstairs. How can she see what was happening on the second floor?

 

A girl was taken to hospital with the zipper of her jeans unzipped. (Online picture)

 

I believe people still remember this photo or video from the day of the gang assault in June: when a girl was beaten all over her body and was unconscious when she was taken to the hospital, the front zipper of the jeans she was wearing was open! Why? Who did it? Does this rule out the possibility that the girl was not sexually assaulted? Wang XX, who was used by the government as a “witness”, can be said to have done a good job under the “excessive power”. The only few words in the video are only about herself, and she does not represent any other victims. It’s just that the popular party media and official media help her make decisions and help her represent other victims. This is why the “rumors” were all over the place. The video released by CCTV and the investigative report of Hebei Province are full of holes and shameless! Just like the five investigation reports on the case of Woman in Chains in March this year, one lie is used to cover up another lie!

 

In addition, people still have a question in their minds: Is the crackdown on gangsters related to the “sudden death” of Liu Wenxi, the Hebei provincial’s director of the Public Security Bureau, secretary of CCP, and newly appointed vice-governor of Hebei? If it were not for this chief of public security who “died suddenly” one month after the assault, would the group members have ended up in the arrest? Police and robbers colluded to make easy money, just like the classic trope of black and white teaming up to cover up the story. China’s current system is like a big hotbed of corruption, where the thriving bacteria intertwine and corrode the host’s body to co-exist.

 

The pervasive sexual assault and harassment problem in China is very serious, and the concept of “people harass you only because you are beautiful”, and “who told you to dress so sexy?” It is very common. Powerful male defendants do what they please with impunity, and women who have the audacity to go to court are often ruined and rarely win cases. The higher the defendant’s social status, power, and wealth, the harder it is to obtain justice! For example, the second trial of Xianzi’s sexual harassment case against CCTV celebrity Zhu Jun was dismissed again because of “insufficient evidence”. The court said there was no on-site audio or video recording. The 4 girls were gang-beaten because of sexual harassment in Tangshan, but the government’s investigation report listed quarrel as the cause of the gang crime and did not mention sexual harassment or assault at all. The rural girls like the “Chain woman” who have been trafficked, raped, gang-raped, and abused have disappeared without a trace. She openly disappeared from the sight of one billion people and all those who visited her became quiet and disappeared.

 

The road to feminism in China is too arduous. To keep going down this road is more difficult than reaching the sky!

 

 

VAG 33rd Tiananmen Commemoration & Annual Award

VAG Published                                        05-29-2022

 

 

 

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE HONOREES

& SPECIAL GUESTS

 

Enes Kanter Freedom who is formerly with the NBA Boston Celtics, Utah Jazz, New York Knicks, Portland Trail Blazers will join us on-line to accept the award. We honor Enes Kanter Freedom for his stand on human rights issues especially during the 2022 Winter Olympics when he used his unique platform to bring international attention to the Uyghur Genocide, Tibetan freedoms and Hong Kong’s loss of civil liberties despite knowing full well the price he has to pay as in the case of former Houston Rockets manager’s tweet in support of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protesters in 2019.

 

Enes had said, “I am telling all my athlete friends: All the gold medals in the world that you can win is not more important than your morals and your values and your principles.” He further urge his fellow athletes and those who have a platform, “… to stand for innocent people out there and be their voice who don’t have a voice.”
For his activism, Enes Freedom was traded to the Houston Rockets but the Rockets waived him resulting that he is no longer on any of the NBA roster.

 

Visual Artists Guild will also be honoring Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan, Chow Hang-Tung, former Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movement of China. The Hong Kong Alliance was founded in May 21, 1989, two weeks before the Tiananmen Massacre. Since the massacre, its main goal was the accountability of the massacre with the estimates of death toll vary from hundreds to thousands. Every year, the Alliance had held candlelight vigil in commemoration of the the massacre until 2020 with Beijing’s imposed National Security Law onto Hong Kong and subsequently had to disband last year.

 

All three of the honorees from the Alliance have been arrested, denied bail and waiting to be tried under the National Security Law.

 

Jing Zhang is the President of Women’s Rights in China (WRIC), a non-profit organization which aims to protect and advance the political, economic, social and cultural rights of women and children in China. The group’s volunteers have exposed cases of human trafficking in China in particular of children and girls. She will talk about the case of the Chained woman which had become the topic which 100 millions in China responded to with personal knowledge.

 

Samuel Chu is the President of The Campaign for Hong Kong which mission is to advocate for US and international leadership and policies that advance human rights and democracy for all Hongkongers. Samuel, an American citizen, is the first foreigner to be issued arrest warrant against him under China’s imposed National Security Law in Hong Kong.

 

Louisa Greve is the Director of Global Advocacy for Ughur Human Rights Project, a non-profit organization which advocates for the rights of the Uyghurs and other Turkin Muslims. She has served on the board of Amnesty International as well as on other human rights Boards and advisory committees.

 

Date: May 29, 2022 Sunday at 2 P.m. (PST), Eastern time: 5Pm

 

HONORING:

Enes Kanter Freedom (Professional Basketball Player 職業籃球運動員)
NBA Boston Celtics, Utah Jazz, New York Knicks, Portland Trail Blazers

 

Hong Kong Alliance 支聯會
(Organization for Hong Kong Tiananmen Candlelight Vigil)

-Lee Cheuk-yan 李卓人 (Former Chair)
-Albert Ho Chun-yan 何俊仁 (Former Chair)
-Chow Hang-Tung 鄒幸彤 (Former Vice-Chair)

 

SPECIAL GUESTS:

Jing Zhang 张菁
President, Women’s Rights in China 中國婦權
Visual Artists Guild 2015 Awardee

Samuel Chu
President, The Campaign for Hong Kong
Visual Artists Guild 2021 Awardee

Louisa Greve
Director of Global Advocacy, Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP)

UHRP is Visual Artists Guild 2021 Awardee

Performance: Ukranian singer Asya Gorska Ukraine flag

To join our event, please click below

Pre-Registration with Zoom:

https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Xqf85qZwTNi3g8LhqDmFow

We will send you a link to join our event.

Live Stream YouTube and Facebook

To be announced

 

Please donate to Ukraine Humanitarian Aid postangeles.org 100% donation goes to Postangeles.org, a volunteer organization collecting humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

 

Go Fund Me:
https://gofund.me/3db123f0

 

 

Ignoring the Abduction and Abuse of Chinese Women, Peng Liyuan Must Resign as “Special Envoy” to Atone

WRIC: Zhang Jing                                                 March 3,2022

 

 

Ignoring the abduction and abuse of Chinese women, Peng Liyuan must resign as “special envoy” to atone

 

 

 

At the end of February this year, a photo of “Eight Girls” with an iron chain tied around her neck was exposed, which aroused widespread concern among the Chinese people, with more than 4 billion clicks and hundreds of millions of comments. The Jiangsu provincial government has released investigation reports five times, all of which used one lie to cover up another lie, and failed to quell the voices of doubt and condemnation from the Chinese people and even overseas Chinese. The Chinese government adopted old-fashioned methods to suppress the media and delete the posts of scholars and netizens. At the same time, the victim “Cha in Girl” was kept in a mental hospital, and local officials were expelled from the Party in lieu of criminal penalties and civil compensation. On March 1, netizens exposed another “Iron Dragon Girl” tragedy in Jiaxian County, Shaanxi Province. A young woman was locked in an iron cage for a long time, but she could not be rescued by the local government police. We are deeply concerned that the “Chain Girls” will be shut up forever in the hospital, and that many more “Cage Girls” in China will be “disappeared”.

 

Today is International Women’s Day on March 8, and March is also the Women’s History Month in the United States. Originally, it was a day when all women in the world happily celebrated their festivals, but during the nearly 40 years of China’s implementation of the national policy of family planning, at least 10 million women and children have Like Xuzhou’s “Chain Girls”, they were trafficked, abused, raped, gang-raped, made into sex slaves and reproductive machines. As China’s first lady, Peng Liyuan was awarded the title of “Special Envoy for the Promotion of Girls’ and Women’s Education” by UNESCO in 2014, but she turned a blind eye to the large number of Chinese women and children in suffering. “Dragon Girl” and other tragedies did nothing; turning a blind eye to the 80 million left-behind children in rural China who lacked care and access to normal education, Peng Liyuan did not deserve this title, she tarnished the name of the special envoy. Therefore, on March 8, International Women’s Day, we make two of requests to UNESCO, UN Women and UNICEF:

 

  1. Require UN Women and UNICEF to intervene, urge the Chinese government to effectively combat the issue of human trafficking, thoroughly investigate the truth of the ongoing cases of “Chain Girl” and “Cage Girl”, and hold all those involved in the criminal interest held accountable. Criminal liability and civil damages.

 

  1. In view of the growing problem of a large number of Chinese and Southeast Asian girls being abducted and trafficked to rural China, Peng Liyuan has done nothing for many years, she has not fulfilled her own responsibilities, we strongly urge UNESCO to cancel Peng Liyuan’s “special envoy for the promotion of women’s and children’s education” Stop dressing up the vanity of the First Lady with the suffering of the girls, and free up the seat for another truly responsible and caring sage.

 

We will never forget the painful eyes of the “Chain Girls” and “Iron Cage Girls”. We will continue to pay attention to them, speak out for justice for them, ask for the truth of the case, criminal accountability and civil compensation, and we will continue to work with the suffering The tormented sisters stand together!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Chinese original article by Jing Zhang)

 

無視中國女性被拐受虐 彭麗媛須辭「特使」謝罪

 

                                          張菁               2022-03-08

 

 

今年2月底,一張脖子上栓有一條鐵鍊的「八孩女」照片曝光後,引發中國民眾的廣泛關注,超過40億次點擊閱讀,數億次的留言。江蘇省政府先後五次發佈調查報告,都是用一個謊言掩蓋另一個謊言,未能平息中國百姓乃至海外華人的質疑和譴責聲浪,中國政府採取老套作法,壓制媒體、刪除學者及網民的帖文,同時把受害人「鐵鍊女」控制在精神病院裡,用開除地方官員黨籍,來代替犯罪刑罰和民事賠償。3月1日網友再曝光了另一樁正在陝西佳縣發生的「鐵龍女」慘案,一名年輕婦女長期被關在一個鐵製的籠子裡,卻得不到當地政府公安的解救。我們深切擔憂,「鐵鍊女」在醫院裡將被永遠閉嘴,中國還有更多的「鐵籠女」們也將會被「消失」。

 

今天是三八國際婦女節,三月也是美國婦女歷史月,原本是世界上所有婦女歡快慶祝自己節日的日子,但在中國實施計生國策的近40年裡,至少有一千萬的女性及兒童與徐州「鐵鍊女」一樣,被拐賣、虐待、強姦、輪姦、做性奴及生育機器。 作為中國第一夫人的彭麗媛,在2014年接受聯合國教科文組織授予「促進女孩和婦女教育特使」的職銜,卻對苦難中的大量中國婦女兒童不聞不問,對「鐵鍊女」、「鐵龍女」等慘案毫無作為;對8千萬缺乏關愛、無法獲得正常教育的中國農村留守兒童視而不見,彭麗媛不配這個頭銜,她玷污了特使的名稱。因此,藉三月八日國際婦女節,我們向聯合國教科文組織及婦女署、兒童基金會提出我們的兩項訴求:

 

1、要求聯合國婦女署及兒童基金會介入、促使中國政府有效打擊人口拐賣問題,徹查正在發生的「鐵鍊女」、「鐵籠女」案件真相, 並追究犯罪利益鏈上所有涉案者的刑事責任和民事賠償。

 

2、鑒於大量中國以及東南亞女孩被拐賣拐騙到中國農村的問題日趨嚴重,多年來彭麗媛毫無作為,她沒有履行她自己的職責,我們強烈要求UN教科文組織取消彭麗媛「促進婦女兒童教育特使」的職銜,停止以女孩們的苦難來裝扮第一夫人的虛榮,把位子騰出來,讓另一個真正有責任心、有愛心的賢達者來勝任該職。

 

我們不會忘記「鐵鍊女」、「鐵籠女」們痛苦的眼神,我們將繼續關注她們,為她們發聲討公道,要案件真相、要刑事追責和民事賠償,我們將繼續與在苦難中煎熬的姊妹們站在一起!

 

 

 

CSW 65 Webinar Jing Zhang : The actual social status of Chinese women

By WRIC Jing Zhang                        March 18, 2021

 

Note: United Nations CSW 65 Webinar – President Jing Zhang of Women’s Rights in China was invited to speak: The actual social status of Chinese women

 

The actual social status of Chinese women

Although we’re meeting over COVID this year for Women’s History Month, it hasn’t stopped us from focusing our attention onto women’s and girls’ rights there at the UN Commission on the Status of Women via the Internet. Today, we’ll share with you an overview of women’s status in China and the root causes for the severe discrimination against women there, with the hope to deepen and broaden the world’s understanding of women’s rights in China.

 

The centurial lack of women within the CCP leadership

 Within the century since the establishment of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the Politburo Standing Committee has consisted of men and only men. During its rule over China in the past 72 years, only 6 women in total have made it into the Politburo, and 3 of those were wifes of the General Secretaries or the Premiers: there hasn’t been any woman within the CCP’s leadership who could actually speak out for her sex. This gender imbalance in political participation is one of the main reasons for the deprivation of women’s rights. The making and execution of policies and law have historically been entirely dominated by a few decision-making men. Taking reproduction as an example, we see how the CCP leadership encouraged women to have multiple children in the 1950s, then between the 1970s and 2010s, inhumane measures were taken to enforce birth control and abortion in order to fulfill the One-Child Policy; then in the 2010s, the policy relaxed to a quota of two; and now as we’ve entered the 2nd decade of the 21st century, they are forcefully pushing for women to bear more children for the country. Such control over women’s fertility and the birth and death of babies has been exerted by just the few men within the Politburo.

 

The women depicted in the CCP’s political propaganda have always looked prime and radiant, exuding confidence and an air of intelligence, living freely and meeting life’s challenges deftly. But the latest data have revealed the truth of women’s lives in China: The Global Gender Gap Report 2020 published by the World Economic Forum ranked China in the 106th place within the 153 countries represented; even some African nations in extreme poverty were ranked higher for women’s status. Xi Jinping cashed in 10 million USD to UN Women in 2015 and received a chance to speak at the opening ceremony of the Global Leaders’ Meeting on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in September that year. And during the few months before that, in order to silence the voices of dissent within China, his admin arrested the Feminist Five for just holding up signs against sexual harassment. Women’s rights in China worsen year after year under Xi’s rule, with inequality and discrimination faced by women becoming more and more common and widespread.

 

   

Life: WRIC with the feminist organizations protesting in front of the UN in 2015 in support of the Feminist Five. Right: WRIC protesting against the hypocrisy of Xi speaking at UN Women yet oppressing women at home (Photos by WRIC)

 

Systemification of sexual assault and rape

 Although the #MeToo movement did make its way into major Chinese cities over the past few years, but most victims of sexual assault in China have remained silent or could only speak anonymously online as they either couldn’t afford a lawsuit or had been blackmailed into not pursuing one. In March 2020, a blogger known as Stacey in China conducted a questionnaire survey online on sexual offences on women. She received over 45,000 responses over the span of a few days. Over 85% of the respondents admitted that they had been sexually harassed or violated before. Some have even left behind comments in which they shared their experiences of being harassed by male colleagues or bosses; there were also stories of them being fired after filing a case to their senior managers. In a report submitted by Professor Fang Xiangming to the WHO, 11.5% of girls and 9.6% of boys in China had been sexually assaulted before. This amounts to over 20 million children per year.

 

Jurisprudence researcher Tian Gang had also pointed that at least 21% of women in China had been subject to sexual assault, and 24.7% to marital rape. These are the numbers that the Chinese government allows out. One can only imagine how much bigger the numbers would be in reality.

 

About 80 million parents in China work in the cities and leave behind their children in the rural areas with their grandparents. These children are often subject to rape  by their extended family and other villagers. Often these rapists are the village officials or their kin, meaning that the parents of these children wouldn’t be able to do anything about the crimes. Minors also fall victim to rape by teachers at school. This phenomenon has persisted for years because the government never penalised the offenders. Wang Yu, a Chinese lawyer and the recipient of the 2021 Women of Courage Award, had led a protest in Hainan along with a few other feminist activists against a case of 6 primary schoolgirls being brought to a hotel and raped by their headmaster.

 

In September 2020, Xu Mouke, a 60-year-oldman in Leizhou City, Zhanjiang, raped an 8-year-old left-behind girl from his neighbor. The girl’s 11-year-old brother took this scene. He passed the photo to his father as evidence. The parents of the girl who were victimized said that they had called the police and accused Xu of sexually assaulting an underage girl. Because there was no evidence, the police did not open the case. (Internet picture)

 

Feminist activists including Ye Haiyan and Lawyer Wang Yi protesting in front of South Wanning Primary School in 2013 over the 6 pupils raped by the headmaster, holding up a sign saying “Get me if you want sex, leave the kids alone.”( Online)

 

In an event organized by WRIC to support 10-year-old Annie’s right to go to school, lawyer Wang Yu ( woman) came forward and negotiated with the police about the legality of the activity.(Photos by WRIC)

 

Sexual assault and rape crimes in China has become systemic over the years and across all layers of society as well as a spectrum of establishments.

 

I have myself witnessed female inmates being raped by prison officers back in the 1980s in Guizhou. They were often taken away by officers for ‘independent work’, and when they returned to the prison cell they were extremely spent and would only cower and weep in a corner. Anyone who spoke among themselves about it or who whistle-blew would be publicly shamed or punished. The recently surfaced case of the Ma sisters in Shenyang is another proof of the systemic inprison rape in China that the authorities do not even bother to hide anymore.

 

The systemic assault on women in any form of captivity is also readily found in peripheral China. The Uyghur women among the 2 million captives in the concentration camps in Xinjiang were not only forced to sing and dance for the Han managers, but also gang-raped by them. Many escapees from the camps have revealed to foreign media their experience and what they had witnessed. Tursunay Ziawudan told the press that during her 9 months in the camp, she was repeatedly raped by a man in a suit and face mask inside of a pitch-dark room without any surveillance cameras installed. The women in the camps would be taken away each night and raped by one or multiple masked men. She had herself been tortured three times by two to three men before they began to gang-rape her regularly. She considered herself extremely lucky to have been able to escape and vocalise the truth — most other women there could not even dream of the opportunity.

 

Within the Uyghur communities, after the men in the family had been kicked into the concentration camps, the emptied-out spot at home would be filled by a Han official. This is part of the CCP’s ‘matchmaking’ schemes. Over the years, the CCP has sent over 1 million Han men into Uyghur homes for surveillance.

 

 Life:Tursunay-Ziawudun, a Uighur woman, told her story in an interview with a BBC reporter. (Screenshot from BBC video)

Right: An Uyghur exile in Taiwan, in tears, on her experience of being sexually assaulted at an interview by CTS Taiwan in 2019 (Screencapped from CTS)

 

And down in Hong Kong, many female protesters and detainees had been subject to different kinds of sexual offences and even rape by the police officers. A prominent case is of a 15-year-old girl Christy Chan Yin-lam who was found dead naked in an inland harbour in September 2019 at the peak of the Anti-Extradition protests. She was known to have been a pro-democracy supporter. And the pathology expert who testified at the coroner’s inquest had expressed that the condition in which she was found was extremely unnatural. Her two lungs weighed differently, which was atypical of a drowning victim; and a prototypical yet crucial test that could’ve been done to constrain the potential causes of death was not done by the pathologist who carried out the autopsy. The case received an open verdict from the coroner’s jury due to insufficient evidence to confidently land on any other available causes of death, and her case has remained a mystery since. There were yet many more young female protesters being groped by the police during arrest operations. Some incidents had been captured on live streams, but yet more would have happened in places where they couldn’t have been documented.

 

 

A young woman at an Anti-Ex tradition protest in Hong Kong being pinned down and groped repeatedly by police officers. (Internet image)

 

Incidents of sexual violence against female protesters by the Hong Kong police.

Artwork in tribute to Christy Chan Yin-lam, the 15-year-old girl whose cause of death remains undetermined (Image credit back to its original artist)

Workplace discrimination

 Over the past 40 years, the economic growth in China has exacerbated the gender income gap in the country. A 2020 report by a human resources platform revealed that women earn only 70% of what men do in the cities in the five years leading up to 2020; the income gap became wider the longer they were employed. Discrimination against women is found through from university admissions to employment. According to Human Rights Watch, 11% of vacancies in the public service were open to men only in 2020; this number was 19% back in 2018 and 2019. WRIC has received reports from women on being discriminated against at the workplace: applicants for posts in journalism have been asked to sign off to terms such as not to have children within the first 5 years of employment on their contracts. Inequality is even worse in the rural areas: for the same amount of physical labour, women are paid 20% less than men.

 

According to an investigation done in 18 provinces in China by the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, 98% of the female workers in manufacturing in the rural areas do not have any health family planning insurance; 72% of them are unprotected by any health insurance, a shocking 29.6% of them have even been asked to work during pregnancy.

 

State-owned All-China Women’s Federation have published data on the female employers’ perception of the gender discrimination they experience: 22% of them expressed that there is severe discrimination; 59% expressed that there is a moderate level of discrimination. A civil society-led investigation on the condition of the current workplace for women in 2020 found that 27% of them had been told that certain posts are reserved for a certain gender only; 58.25% of women had been asked questions on their marital status or on family planning during job interviews; and 6.39% had been demoted or moved posts during family planning. Most of these data are officially published, meaning that the reality could be way worse.

 

Discrimination not only occurs in the workplace, but it also appears in any corner of society at any time. The judge’s decision is also inseparable from discrimination and injustice. A “blackmail case” in Jiangsu from March 2021 is jaw-dropping, but not uncommon.

 

A scandalous case of blackmailing occurred in Jiangsu in March 2021. A single woman had sexual relations with nine officials in five years. The judge sentenced the woman to 13 years in prison and confiscated her 3.726 million yuan of “extortion” from nine men and a fine of 5 million yuan. In this case, The government benefited 8.7 million yuan from the girl. Nine married men and the high officer all became victims.

 

The PUA culture is deemed as extreme misogyny by the West and yet when it found the right soil in China it proliferated as a full-blown industry. The leading PUA company in China had over 400 employees in 2017 and over 100,000 subscribed members. Another one, which runs an online course, had 2 million subscribers in 2018. These courses teach men how to inflict psychological pain on women, seduce and set up rapes charge up to a few tens of thousands of Chinese yuans for tuition.

 

‘Naked loans’ is an industry. Loan companies collude with the mafias and target college and even high school girls nationwide for high-interest transactions. Many students came from the rural area and couldn’t afford the high living cost in the cities, and as governmental funding is non-existent, they had to turn to the devil’s deals. The girls need to send over a selfie photo or video of themselves naked holding out their ID cards in some form of erotic pose as collateral when borrowing. If they couldn’t pay off the loans and the interest by the due date, the company would publicise their nudes and personal communications. Some girls could even be forced into prostitution to pay off their loans. Some have taken their own lives over this. WRIC received an email back three years ago in which over 100 girls’ stories of being sexually abused had been documented, along with their nudes. We haven’t been able to publicise these stories as we aren’t able to guarantee protection for the girls given the collusion between the police and the mafias in China.

 

Life: A salesman at a pop-up stall selling ‘naked loan’ plans outside of a university in Wuhan in 2016. (Online photo)

Right: Selfie of a naked female loaner holding up her ID card being used as collateral for the loan. (Photo by WRIC)

 Large-scale trafficking of women

  In the 2020 Trafficking in Persons Report published by the US State Department on 25th June, China was ranked the third worst. This is the fourth time that China has made it onto the list since 2017. Since the Chinese government had never submitted any law enforcement data, and the crime data reported were heavily hedged, it’s difficult to evaluate the reality of the situation in China. What could be found about the trafficking of women in China on the UN’s website is from 10 years ago, and the data came from the Chinese authorities themselves. (http://kidnap.bz.cn/2019/7477.html)

 

Women aren’t trafficked just within China, but transnationally as well. WRIC has received many alerts of illegal prostitutes from China in the US. They work all year around and may take up to a few tens of clients per day, even that barely covers the stowaway cost. Some have been rescued with help from the US police, and as we hoped that they could stand as witnesses against the traffickers at court after they had settled into their new lives on their V visa, they had not been able to due to fear of retribution at their families back in China.

 

The One-Child Policy had skewed the gender ratio of China, it created a phenomenon of at least 30 million bachelors without a match today. These men resorted to buying themselves a wife from South East Asia to bear them children. According to an incomplete survey, there were over 100 thousand ‘Vietnamese brides’ in China in 2015; less than half of them were legally married to a man, most of them lived in extreme poverty in rural villages and went about without an ID. Allegations of disappearances and deaths of these South East Asian brides are not uncommon, but there have never been any official numbers.

 

The public sign said: Buy a Vietnamese virgin bride for 200 thousand yuan (30,700USD).  (Internet picture)

 

Domestic violence and suicide as a norm

 According to the data from the state-owned All-China Women’s Federation, domestic violence occurred in 25% of the 270 million families in China in 2019; 157 thousand females commit suicide each year, 60% of those were caused by domestic abuse. One woman is abused at home every 7.4 seconds on average; the victims endure an average of 35 abuses before they’d call the police. Death by domestic violence makes up over 40% of foul play for women. The abusers are mostly male. A semi-state-owned women’s rights organisation has also pointed out that between 1 March 2016 and 31 October 2017, 533 cases of death by domestic violence had been recorded; these involved 635 deaths including also children, meaning that at least one person dies from domestic abuse each day on average, and she is likely a woman.

 

In light of the high divorce rate in China, a 30-day cooling-off period has been legislated and enforced since 2020. During these 30 days, victims of domestic abuse could be subject to yet more violence and threats. A young Tibetan woman in Sichuan was repeatedly attacked by her husband who habitually splashed gasoline onto her, with all her calls for help ignored by both the local law enforcers and the court, she was eventually burned to death after two weeks.

 

      A picture of the late Tibetan victim of domestic abuse.(Internet image)

 

China was once a country in which the female suicide rate was higher than that for male: rural women are 60% more likely to kill herself than men, while the global average finds that men are 25% more likely to commit suicide than women. Academics think that the movement of rural women to the cities had kept women away from the lethal herbicides with which they could use to kill themselves. However, as the Chinese government began their operations to chase rural workers back home as cities began to saturate, these figures are likely to rise again. The Chinese authorities are unlikely to take actions as they continue to push for a high rate of economic growth at the expense of the workers’ basic human rights. Against this backdrop, rural women and children will suffer the most.

 

Recent years have seen the Chinese government’s implicit plan to force rural-originated workers away from the cities as the urban areas got overburdened and as the government had finished milking out all the cheap manpower they could get from these workers. In 2017, the Beijing authorities began the most radical operation to force rural-originated workers back home. The mayor flattened an entire area that used to house over 10,000 workers and the families whom he deemed ‘lowlives’ overnight by claiming that there was a fire. From then on, there were no more rural-originated workers in Beijing, but only the urban population and the awe-inspiring skyscrapers that these workers had built.

 

With COVID-19 taking a serious toll on the country’s economy and with local authorities using epidemic control as an excuse to banish rural-originated workers, hundreds of millions of them will now return to the barren lands from which they gave their all to build a life away. What awaits the middle-aged women that return into such an environment is unemployment, infertility, discrimination and helplessness, and the old way of life in which they could just end their lives with a mouthful of herbicide, where there would be even less chance for them to access professional support. The Chinese government has ignored the severity of the consequences and has done nothing to prevent women from committing suicide.

 

The warzone-like ruins of the Da Xing district that used to be home to the rural workers in Beijing.  (Photo by Bryan Denton)

 

 Closing remarks:

The systemic sabotage of women by the CCP

Researchers have distilled the factors behind the high female suicide rates into 3 C’s: Communist, Confucius, and Commercial. In fact, the last C can’t be the main cause for suicide as the Chinese people are rather accustomed to poverty, and poverty-driven suicide attempts have been extremely rare. The real driver for the high rural female suicide rate is the 40-year-long draconian one-child policy along with a series of related legislation, which regressed society back into the malfunctional system of the past and led to the further degradation of what little remained of women’s rights in China.

 

Within the little-known Chinese Museum of Women and Children in Beijing, none of the displays were the drugs or tools used to control women’s fertility, nor are there any numbers or text showing the harm inflicted on the hundreds of millions of women subject to the cruel fertility policies devised by the government, nor anything about the forty million aborted babies as mothers were coerced to comply to the one-child policy. 40 years of the largest forcible birth control operation known to man had disappeared on the land of China, just like how children born in the 90s in China had never heard about the Tiananmen Massacre. All this reflects the ironic success of the CCP at covering up history and shutting up mouths forever.

 

Since Xi Jinping began his rule, women were put back into the home as just a wife and a child bearer. The status of women in society described in ancient literature that even Mao had scorned at has been brought back to life. In the CCP’s eye, the diminishment of women helps consolidate their rule. Xi’s oppression of women who would speak out against it paints a grim future for feminism in China, one in which patriarchy prevails and grows ever stronger and women’s rights and living space shrivel into nothing.

 

***********************

About Jing Zhang:

Jing Zhang is the youngest member of the Chinese Democracy Wall movement in 1979. She wrote the articles criticizing the Chinese government, and she was sentenced to 5 years in prison. After being released, she worked as an editor for a newspaper in Hong Kong. After Hong Kong returned to China in 1997, she came to the United States and continued to work as an editor for Chinese newspapers and continued to advocate for democracy in China.

In 2007, Jing Zhang  established the Women’s Rights in China organization, dedicated to fighting for the rights and interests of Chinese women and children and promoting women’s political and social status.

 

 

 

 

WRIC Joins Women’s March Parade

All pictures are provided by WRIC          January 20, 2018

 

On January 20, 2018, on the first anniversary of Donald Trump’s reign, the United States and all over the world held large demonstrations and protests against Trump. Including Cleveland, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia, New York, Chicago, Austin, Rome, Italy, Toronto, Canada and other major cities in the world, the parades are simultaneously held. Hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets, on Trump’s anniversary to oppose Trump’s policies and support the recent #MeToo campaign against sexual harassment and sexual assault, calling for women’s empowerment. Millions of Americans did the same thing on the same day by going to the streets to protest against Trump’s presidential year-long injury to the United States on U.S. policies and issues such as healthcare, immigration, environmental protection, women’s rights and education which greatly damaged the U.S. international image and position.

 

 

Women’s Rights in China, after attending the Women’s March anti-Trump parade in Washington, DC last year (2017), once again participated in the protest at Women’s March in New York City, yesterday (January 20, 2018). The banner slogan was Anti-sexism, anti-racial discrimination and anti-sexual harassment. More than 200,000 New Yorkers were in downtown, spanning over 20 streets including the Central Park, parading around. Men and women wore pink cat hats to protest Trump’s sexual harassment and their contemptuous and disrespectful remarks. The long parade reunited with a stream of pink people, meandering through downtown New York. Many of the participants in this year’s parade are family members. Mothers and fathers held their children and pushed babies in strollers, the elderly and disabled people in wheelchairs. Some of them even had crutches and still go to anti-Trump demonstrations, making people admire them and being moved. Some slogans of anti-Trump slogans were also displayed on the windows of some street-side buildings, some striking the percussion drums to attract attention, some interacting with the people in the streets and some applauding each other while shouting slogans to encourage continued resistance. “Shithole Hotel! Shithole Hotel!” were the chanting words when people passed by Trump International Hotel near Central Park, this phrase “shithole” was very derogatory used in Trump’s meeting not long ago when it comes to the issue of the immigration of African countries to the United States The dirty word, the “shithole countries” sparked a wave of protests.

 

One of the hallmarks of this year’s Women’s March parade in New York City is that nearly a quarter of the participants are men, most notably young men, who are at least 6 or 7 times more than last year and have a wider range of placards. It can be seen that in the past year since Trump came to power, people especially women became dissatisfied with Trump and his actions.

 

 

 

\

 

When people passed by Trump International Hotel near Central Park, they chanted, “Shithole hotel!” “Shithole hotel!”. This “shithole” was very derogatory for Trump’s remark on the countries in a meeting about the issue of the immigration of African countries to the United States The dirty word, the “shithole countries” sparked a wave of protests. (By Jing Zhang)

 

The flag carried by this protester was designed by herself. The white stripes are all female bodies. It represents half of the U.S. population as women. They must attach importance to the election and have their own representatives. (By Jing Zhang)

 

 

Some slogans of anti-Trump slogans were also printed on the windows of some street-side buildings, some striking the percussion drums for striking, some interacting with the people in the streets and some applauding each other while shouting slogans to encourage continued resistance.  (By Jing Zhang)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Women’s Rights in China Ten Years Anniversary Forum

By WRIC                                        September 23,2017

 

             In 2005, a series of pictures of children and elderly cooking and feasting on an infant’s corpse was spread on the internet: a tiny body washed, the serene body laid upon a chopping board with expensive Chinese medicine, an grotesque man next to a small pot placed on the fire…the last picture was the whole family sitting around the table chewing on the meat with the skin, and drinking the soup…experienced journalist Jing Zhang was in great shock. Not long after, she came upon the reports of two girls who had their uterus forcibly removed by Nantong Orphanage. The orphanage supervisor justified his actions by claiming it was a burden to clean up during their menstruation and that it would prevent them from getting pregnant. He said the same practice was common throughout the country. Journalists subsequently uncovered lists of female orphans who had been victimized by the procedure. Jing, working in the media in New York at that time, vowed to fight with all she could for the rights of girls like them in China. After a chance conversation with human rights activist Gao Yu, Jing was inspired in 2007 to found Women’s Rights in China, an NGO devoted to defend the rights of persecuted women and children in China and advocate for their welfare and a more just society.

 

After extensive research, WRIC  found that the cruel, systemic and long-lasting Family Planning Policy was at the root of the disastrous state of women’s rights in China. It has led to widespread gender imbalance, population aging and child trafficking. It has produced in effect the greatest massacre by casualty count in human history. It is therefore, the job of Women’s Rights in China to assist women, children and their families who were in the crosshairs of the government policy, particularly in the Chinese countryside, to fight against forced abortions and human trafficking in the past decade.

 

 

Ann Noonan(Right 2), Executive Director Committee for U.S. International Broadcasting presented WRIC with a commemorative plaque.

 

Writer Eva was speaking.

 

 

Ann Noonan was speaking.

 

Lawyer Teng Biao was speaking.

Yao Cheng was speaking.

Chen Liqun was speaking.

Jing Zhang was speaking.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our efforts were worth it!

Article: WRIC Jing Zhang                             Translator: Cai Shiwen                                       All images from WRIC

 

 

Last Sunday (December 18, 2016) we went to see little Annie Zhang’s piano performance in Carnegie Hall. She only has started playing piano in 2013, and now is competing against peers with 10 years of practicing. She is an intelligent, artistic student with a kind heart. At Carnegie Hall we also met Annie’s elder sister Ruli Zhang. She is an independent, confident and beautiful young woman. Seeing the sisters made us recall what happened three years ago.

 

Those protests day and night in China 2013.

 

In 2013,Our Women’s Rights in China organized the protests in Hefei City, Anhui Province of China. Hundreds of our supporters gathered for two weeks, in support of the daughter of Lin Zhang, Little Annie Zhang, to have the right to go to school. Later, many of us were detained and questioned by Hefei Police. Yao Cheng , Zhou Weilin and Zhang Lin were sentenced to prison because of their participation. In New York I worked closely with  Ann Noonan of CUSIB Executive Director and Reggie Little John of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers founder. With help in and outside of China, little Annie and her sister Ru Li  finally escaped the Communist regime. Reggie adopted Annie and has been providing her with only love and care. Ann and me helped Ru Li when her came to NY. We rescued a teenage genius who was deprived of the basic right to receive education. Zhang Lin, a leading pro-democracy activist who had been tortured by CCP for many years, is now relieved from his greatest concern. We are so proud of little Annie and her growth in the past three years. All our efforts were worth it!

 

Please click the link below to see the scene of our solidarity gatherings in Hefei. Many familiar faces are among the group pictures. At least ten people after helped Anne who suffered severe political persecution, included the founder Xu Zhiyong of New Citizens Movement, and are now still in prison in China.

 

        

Jing Zhang picked up Ruli from JFK airport Sep 11,2013./ Ann Noonan and Ruli Zhang were with WRIC’s members and got together for dinner Sep  13, 2013.

 

            

 

Reggie Littlejohn and her husband with adopted daughters, Ruli and Annie./  Jing Zhang hugged Annie befor watched Annie’s piano performance in Carnegie Hall New York.

 

 

 

 

 

A Meteor Across the Night Sky—Harry Wu and the Laogai Museum

 

I received a call from a former prisoner of conscious still living in China. The caller gave his condolences and asked for information on Mr. Wu. He also asked whether the Laogai Research Foundation would continue to sponsor jailed dissidents or their families. I replied that all of the application forms are still on Laogai’s website with no changes, so I believe the Foundation would continue as it had when Mr. Wu was still living.

 

About Harry Wu’s sudden death, I do not know the real reason. Then I remembered it had been three months since Wu’s passing. Suddenly, I had mixed feelings. I stood outside, looking at the stars, feeling a little weary, when I saw a meteor streak across the sky.  A fighter. Comrades in arms tend to go quietly. Some of us wear our emotions on our sleeves, but all people are vulnerable and life is ephemeral. We are born with empty hands and die with empty hands, but what happens in between? A question we all struggle with remained persistent in my mind: What is the meaning of life? What does our spiritual conscience mean to history?

 

I remember first seeing Harry Wu in Hong Kong in 1995. He was collecting information about labor reform, specifically organ trafficking of death row inmates.  At the time he was convicted and sentenced to 15 years with “stealing state secrets.” After the expulsion, he had a short stay in Hong Kong.  National correspondents were blocked from interviewing him. I was the editor of a newspaper; with local media work permits allowed to enter the hotel he was staying. At the door, I said, “I have not come for an interview. There are other newspaper reporters doing interviews. I came to tell you that 10 years ago I had counter-revolutionary propaganda against me. I was imprisoned in the labor camps for five years. The labor camp where I was exported tea, sold at high prices in the West, including the United States. Spring and autumn was picking season, in the winter we trimmed tealeaves working 15 to 18 hours a day. I’d start before dawn and return to the laogai barracks after dark. There were no wages, no rest, unless the harvest did not sprout on time, then it might be half a day’s work.” We talked for about an hour. Before leaving, we encouraged each other with mutual words of support.

 

I saw Wu again in December of 1999. He scrimped and saved overcoming the challenges of opening a non-profit organization. In 1992, the Laogai Research Foundation (LRF) was established.  It was time the world understand the real status of human rights in China. Wu repeatedly accompanied Western reporters into the far off provinces of China to collect data on death row organ transplantation.

 

The return of Hong Kong to China in 1997 saw a mass exodus.  I along with a group of political exiles fled to the United States. I remained a journalist in New York City.

 

I learned Wu was giving a press conference to illustrate criminal intent and behavior having recordings and other evidence of perpetrators trying to buy and sell organs. I arrived at the office of Beijing Spring magazine in Flushing, New York, to ascertain the whole story. As it turned out, someone had taken out an ad in a Chinese-language newspaper in New York claiming to provide human organs for purchase.

 

A man simply known as “Wang,” claimed to have as many as 50 individual kidneys. Wu enlisted the help of intermediaries that could meet with Wang to discuss the kidney trading business. During the meeting with Wang, several severe offenses were revealed and the police intervened, but in the end, a key witness refused to testify and the court dismissed the case.

 

At that the same time the CCP enlisted a large group of newspaper reporters to cooperate with each other and the defendant to personally attack Wu. Neither haughty nor humble, Wu stood alone.  I really admired him for his pursuit of righteousness without fear. In response, someone on the Internet relentlessly released a statement, “No one should help Wu; otherwise ‘the white knife would become red.’” (A popular idiom used during the Cultural Revolution suggesting extreme and deadly force).  Motivated by Wu’s courage, I wrote an article for the independent democratic forumon the death penalty in China.

 

After years of efforts, Falun Gong practitioners strongly followed Wu promoting investigation of CCP organ harvesting procedures.  China finally announced on January 1, 2015, the cessation of organs from capital punishment criminals. It can be said that without Wu and unremitting efforts, the Chinese Communists would not easily give up the big business. However, in the Chinese Communist dictatorship remains a hotbed for bribery and corruption as officials cooperate with criminals trying to smuggle and traffic human organs only to be sold to Chinese dignitaries, Taiwan, Southeast Asian countries, and even to Westerners.  In March of this year in Putian, Fujian severalchildren were found in a room, their bodies lined with sewn incisions from removed organs.

 

Years later I was reacquainted with Wu at a commemoration for the victims on June fourth. It was then that I really understood Wu’s concept for the creation of his foundation. In 2003, I was invited to participate in a laogai fundraising seminar primarily for Chinese political prisoners and dissidents. It was beneficial to meet so many people who, like me, had labored for many years, but it eventually became devastating hearing so many similar stories. I couldn’t imagine the laogai continues to exist.

 

The Department of CPC Central Committee issued a directive on August 25, 1955  “to completely eliminate counterrevolutionaries,” one way, which is reeducation through labor. This legislation is the source that has stripped people like Wu of his youth. It wasn’t until 2001 that this evil system was officially rescinded publically. However, because of the nature of authoritarian regimes and dictatorships, the government can keep a person in prison; send them to work sites, just like the Cultural Revolution did to those counter-revolutionary rightists. For more than 60 years, the Chinese Communist regime has used the same old tricks. Even having one person put international pressure on China is better than nobody at all.

 

Which is why today laogai is found in the dictionary, synonymous with the Nazi concentration camps and Soviet gulags. And in 2008, his museum became the first in the world to specifically target Chinese human rights. It can be said, if not for Wu, the history of China’s persecution, the stories of those who have suffered may not see the light of day. We all eagerly await the day when Wu’s wish to have a Laogai Museum on the streets of Beijing is realized.

 

The Laogai Research Foundation touches on many human rights issues: slave labor and sweat shops, religious rights, supporting Tibetan issues and the Dalai Lama including rights for all minorities, supporting political prisoners past and present like Wei Jingsheng, Wang Dan, the 2010 Nobel laureate Liu Xiaobo, and the lawyer Gao Zhisheng. Wu used the law of the United States to prosecute large companies colluding with the CCP violating human rights such as Yahoo. It’s almost been a decade that the Laogai Museum has joined the numerous wealth of museums in the District of Columbia. The Foundation has published a variety of books including The Black Series in which chief editor of Beijing Spring Mr. Ping Huping praises, “LRF is doing boundless good.”

 

During Wu’s lifetime, he worked with the US Customs agency, checking Chinese exports for prison slave labor products. It is said by the CCP, that the export of slave labor products is good for prison inmates. The prison inmates can make money that will improve their life, but who benefits the most? Go to the jails and you’ll find a large number have been arrested arbitrarily and forced to produce products [improperly equipped that risks their health]. The world wonders how China has so quickly accumulated vast wealth. It hurts the Chinese people. Factory jobs have eroded. Of which the survival of the ordinary Chinese workers has become unfair. It’s also unfair to American workers as the import and export of goods is in violation of US trade regulations. More importantly, universal human rights are violated.

 

Long before China’s 2007 woman’s rights were established, Wu had been in the United States petitioning Congress and other organizations condemning China’s One-Child Policy. In 1998, with the aid of Wu, the US Congress passed legislation identifying the Chinese regime’s forced abortion and sterilization practices. This enabled many women to escape China and seek asylum in the US. In 2009, I gave testimony to the US Congress on behalf of women afflicted by inhuman national policies of family planning.

 

2b                                     045a

 

(From left ) Zhang Jing and Harry Wu, testifies in front of a Congressional hearing. (Photo by WRIC)

Veteran pro-democracy activist Chen Liqun has selflessly volunteered to assist LRF and Laogai Museum by providing copious amounts of information from prisoner biographies to screening eligible dissidents for aid.  Not once has Chen asked for compensation in return. It’s not always cheap both monetarily and emotionally contacting mainland China, which Chen has done countless times at her own expense. Since Wu’s passing, Chen still continues to work for his cause. She has never participated to denounce Wu. Her work is to help her suffering comrades.

I may not agree totally with Wu, but I have very much the same outlook. It is better to help out those who have or are suffering than to wallow in unsubstantiated speculation. I have provided samples of tea to the Museum forced labor products display. I’ve never asked for praise, for thanks, or tried to collect payment. I have no complaints. I do it in honor of Harry Wu. Those of us who do this know that it is for those who fought on the front lines. We are free of our conscience. We do it for no one else, but we act positively against the oppressive regime that has begun to manifest itself here in the US. That is our enemy.  Are actions are not for the spineless that spew slanderous sludge. Perhaps the “love-hate” relationship is the norm nowadays, [but I’m not one to follow].

 

In recent years, there have been negative articles about Wu some who have remained anonymous authors. They result to personal attacks. These authors seem to have two distinct characteristics: 1.) They have worked closely with Wu or for LRF, 2.) They have received aid from Wu. In particular is one such attacker who has received generous aid from Wu and seeks to bleed him for her own personal selfish gain. (Click here for the Chinese article.)

 

In regards to the tumorous articles about Wu’s sexual harassment, I believe those libellants have forgotten they live in a judicious country.  They must not be familiar with the weapons of law. These offenders are unforgiveable. Let there be a trial, let the evidence speak, at which there is little. Only the court has the right to make a conclusion. Yet, these foes with no credentials continue to publish complaints as if they were still in China. They make a mockery of themselves, the community, and the true victims.

 

Wu’s life was full of ups and downs. Interned in the camps for 19 years, he lost all his youth.  Human nature can be twisted. He rose from the depths of darkness to give light to consciousness. But people are not gods and Wu was neither immortal nor infallible. He was at times arrogant and stubborn which caused him to lose friends or collaborators. It was also these qualities that enabled him to reveal earthshattering knowledge of the laogai. Overall, his entire lifetime was dedicated to the laogai. It might have been enough for the man to accomplish as least two things: the introduction of the word laogai into the Oxford English Dictionary and the permanent establishment of the Laogai Museum. After half a century since the Cultural Revolution, the ghosts in China have nowhere to rest. Not one museum has been built dedicated to this time. Wu’s museum is a monument to Chinese history. It’s one of the stars that burn brightest in the sky. When I look up at heaven’s expanse, I do not see Harry Wu, because he’s still here on earth, in a sturdy house in DC called the Laogai Museum.

 

 

 

  Can the Two-Child Policy Improve the Human Rights Situation in China?

   Author: Jing Zhang       Translator: Jennifer Yuan           10/02/2016

   Women’s Rights in China Director Jing Zhang was invited to give a speech at the conference “The Prospects for Democratization in China” organized by The China Democracy Forum, New York University (NYU) and Beijing Spring magazine. The theme of the conference was “The Match between Righteousness and Evil, The Responsibility and Choice of International Society”

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s earliest population policy began in April, 1950. There was a lack of military personnel after the long war and the workforce in society had shrunk. The Central Government and the Military Committee joined hands in formulating the “Methods of Limiting Abortion Among Female Military Cadres,” imposing strict requirements on women who required abortions: it had to be approved by the husband, doctor, and the Head of their unit. Those who secretly underwent abortion were harshly punished.

A few years later, the CCP leaders, who had no foresight at all, again adjusted the population policy, making opposite regulations. In 1979, they implemented a nation-wide One-Child Policy, and this was the beginning of the tragic fate of women in China. Afterwards, the CCP obtained comprehensive control over the uteruses of China’s women, setting rules about when they needed to get an Intrauterine Device (IUD) and when they needed to be sterilized. The Party gained control over the private lives of couples, regulating when they can get pregnant, when they can give birth…everything is decided by the Party. This is unprecedented in history, the one and only in the world, a true Chinese specialty. The CCP’s propaganda machine always claims that China is about to explode, so it cannot further develop unless it enforces population control. Yet, China’s neighbor India, which is also in Asia, has a huge population, but has not implemented coercive birth planning, and has not exploded. Instead, it seems to be developing steadily, with an economic growth rate even surpassing China in the 2nd quarter of 2015/16 (source: CNBC http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/30/india-economic-growth-outpaces-china-rbi-seen-holding-rates.html  /   India economic growth outpaces China, RBI seen holding rates).

From the following points, we can see that whatever changes are made to the population policy the CCP formulates, it will be irrelevant to human rights, and the policy of planned murders are still being executed. No matter how big of a giant China’s economy becomes, it is still a dwarf in the aspect of universal values.

Permission and Authorization to Give Birth are both Violations of Human Rights

After coercively enforcing a One-Child Policy and continuously harming women and children in China for 36 years, CCP leaders proclaimed a new directive in the 18th Central Committee: a Two-Child Policy would be launched throughout the nation, whereby residents are allowed to have two children.

Of course, if someone dares to go against the policy and have a third child, the consequences are the same as the old policy: forced abortion or fines, because these coercive policies are still being implemented and have not been cancelled. That means, the Party still has control over women’s uterus and still restricts the natural rights of couples to have children. Heavy fines which leave civilians penniless and their families in ruins are still collected. This birth planning policy is like a sword hanging over people’s heads, ready to slash down at anytime. This Party has kept its clutches over the uterus of Chinese women like in the 50s in ring the previous century. When the Party tells you to have babies, you have to produce some; when it tells you not to, you must stop. It gives you the number of children you should have, and you must follow. Having fewer children would have resulted in harsh punishment, and now having too many will lead to forced abortion or fines! The power of determining the life and death of new lives has been held by a few men in the leadership level of the CCP.

During the CCP’s 36-year era of implementing a One-Child Policy, forced abortion and fines were guidelines for the Birth Planning cadres. It was not uncommon for civilians to be subject to economic sanctions, violation of rights through physical force, unlawful detention, assault and even destruction of property and loss of family. Some couples with “over-quota” births were persecuted and were forced to hide in different places, even escaping to other countries to seek political asylum. Women’s Rights in China (WRIC) volunteers Su Changlan, Yao Cheng, Chen Qitang etc. spoke out for farmer Zhang Ronghua, who was killed with her baby in a forced abortion in Lijin County, Shandong Province.

%e5%bc%b5%e6%a6%ae%e8%8a%b1%e7%94%9f%e5%89%8d%e8%88%87%e5%a5%b3%e5%85%92%e5%92%8c%e4%b8%88%e5%a4%ab%e7%9a%84%e5%90%88%e5%bd%b1

See below: Zhang Ronghua was with her husband, daughter. Photo by WRIC

WRIC volunteers also saved Cao Ruyi and the life of her little baby, who were almost forced to undergo abortion in an obstetric bed in Changsha, Hunan. These volunteers who demonstrated such humanitarian spirit have all been arbitrarily detained by the Chinese government. Among them, Su Changlan and Chen Qitang have already been imprisoned for 2 years without being sentenced, and are prohibited from medical parole.

The Chinese government always claims that the Family Planning Policy led to a great decline in the death rates of pregnant women and infants, but this is just a lie that becomes more pronounced as they try to cover it up. In fact, the government’s statistics only include licensed hospitals. Its lack of truthfulness lies in the fact that a significant number of women with over-quota births have to avoid the fine and don’t have birth permits, so can only deliver in unlicensed hospitals or at home, especially villagers and pregnant girls that are under age. There are a large number of cases in which both mother and infant die due to miscarriage or infection through unhygienic abortion equipment, leading to massive hemorrhage etc., and they are not included in government statistics. Also excluded are pregnant women living in remote mountainous areas or ethnic minorities who die because they couldn’t get hospitalized in time during emergency situations due to underdeveloped transportation and medical systems. Once women and their families have more children than permitted by the government, they have to pay fines consisting of heavy Social Childcare Fees, or they put themselves in jeopardy and deliver under the risk of having no medical facilities, which is a match with the grim reaper. Two years ago in Liupanshui area in Guizhou, a migrant worker secretly returned to her hometown to deliver her second child, but had a massive hemorrhage. The midwife couldn’t stop it and both mother and child died.

On September 27, 2016, the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission published a shocking statistic: half a year after the national launch of the Two-Child Policy, the death rate of pregnant women has risen: in the first half of 2016, the death rate of pregnant women in the nation has increased by 30.6% when compared to the same time period last year. The Commission has to admit that “there are serious issues in protecting the safety of mothers and newborn babies.” Yet the Deputy Head of the Commission blames it on other factors: increase in births, higher proportion of older mothers, high costs and risks in Obstetrics & Gynecology and pediatrics, medical personnel consisting of more young women who have their own reproductive needs, and a lack of human resources. They are taking the branch for the root! We must ask: didn’t the government think about these practical problems that must be dealt with and solved before they decided to launch the Two-Child Policy? Did the government allocate funding for vocational training programs? Are relevant units and staff held accountable for cases of death? Why is there a higher proportion of older mothers? What responsibilities should the government take for implementing a coercive One-Child policy for the past decades? One conclusion we can make is that, as long as the government enforces a coercive birth planning policy, no matter one child or two are permitted, Chinese women still have no freedom in guarding their own uterus, death and harm is forever their nightmare, and the government will keep shifting their responsibility.


Coercive Fines are a Cash Cow for Rulers

Since the 1980s, medical information and data related to Birth Planning have been labeled as state secret, and even became one of the top national secrets in the end of the 80s. Birth Planning fines have remained a mystery for the past 40 years.

The government has never publicized where these fines ended up, and no auditing agency has the right to publish this financial report. According to incomplete statistics (consisting only of 22 provinces), the total amount of fines in 2012 was 16.8 billion, but strangely, this huge amount has been kept safe and hasn’t become a concern to the media. Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaigns these few years have not resulted in any “tigers” or “flies” being caught for mishandling or embezzling birth planning fines.

In 2013, the National Health Bureau was combined with the Family Planning Committee and became the National Health and Family Planning Commission. The Head of the National Health and Family Planning Commission directly oversees the new commission, which is a merge of the two major systems in China. The other agency directly headed by the government and funded by it, i.e. the Family Planning Association, with 94 million full-time and part-time workers (statistics from its official website), has taken over a majority of the functions of the original Family Planning Committee. The Family Planning Association’s largest funding from the government in 2015, is used for the 94 million staff from the previous Family Planning Committee to directly manage the birth planning of the 250 million farmers in all large cities in the nation, i.e. monitoring and coercing migrant workers to carry out the CCP’s harsh birth planning policy. The government’s policy for fines has not changed. That means that when the nation needed youths, peasants produced children even during hard times, and raised them up to become society’s strong labor force, but they received no rewards and social welfare from the government, and instead now have to pay fines to the government for over-quota births. If the timing between their first and second pregnancies doesn’t follow the government’s regulations, if they have children out of wedlock, or get pregnant before getting married, they all have to be fined.

The CCP’s policy of fines has never been lenient, and continues to lead to tragedies and deaths, destruction of families, and continues to trample over the freedom and rights of Chinese women and children to live and give life.

Coercive Birth Planning Brings Endless Troubles to China

China’s Coercive Birth Planning Policy has brought obvious disasters. Besides the infamous human rights disaster, there are also a series of social problems like serious gender imbalance and a rapidly aging population.

Serious Imbalance in Population Structure

During the era when birth planning was implemented harshly, some families killed or abandoned female infants to keep the quota of having a boy to meet the nation’s regulations. Chinese scholars state that the current gender ratio of newborn infants is 118:100. In 2000, the ratio in Hainan Province reached 135.64:100. WRIC launched activities in Erlang Town, Susong County, Anhui Province, and an elementary school teacher told us that there were 57 students in her class, but only 16 were girls. We conducted a study on the gender ratio in two villages in 2010 and 2011, and the average ratio was 145:100 and 135:100. Scholars warn that there will be 40 million single men. When 2050 arrives, there will be 100 million men that don’t have wives to marry. The gender ratio has been continuously high for many years. This not only destroys the population structure, it also leads to many social problems such as an increase in crime rate. According to scholars, the Chinese government will greatly increase conscription to solve the problem of single men, but this will be a potential security threat to countries nearby.

Aging problems hinder economic development

In his book Empty Nest of the Great Nation, population studies expert Fuxian Yi criticizes the Chinese government’s birth planning policy. This book was banned in China. Yi determined that “the nature of China’s economic crisis is its population crisis.” Currently, the elderly population over 60 years old in China has surpassed 212 million, comprising 15.5% of the total population. According to forecasts, around 2040, China’s elderly population will reach its peak and will exceed 400 million, that means there 1 out of 3 people will be an elderly. In an aging society, there is a serious inadequacy of robust labor, hindering economic development. The Empty Nest phenomenon and aging population will intensify a series of social problems and become a heavier burden.

After a decade of an extremely low birth rate, it is a proven fact that even if a Two-Child Policy is launched, the situation cannot be saved: unlike experts’ expectations, youths in China lack the intention of having a second child. Eight government departments in Yichang City, Hubei, released a document calling for all Communist Party and Youth League members in government agencies and corporate units to take the lead in producing a second child, proclaiming that “one child poses risks, two children are great.” We don’t know whether to cry or laugh at such type of propaganda. Nevertheless, they highlight three points: (1) the Birth Planning Policy implemented for decades by the CCP has been proven to be a short-sighted wrong decision; (2) the local officials enforcing the policy are extremely ignorant; and (3) rulers without values of human rights, democracy and freedom can forever shift their attitudes like clouds and rain, and civilians are always the ones that suffer from the calamity.

In conclusion, in the eyes of the CCP’s dictatorship, civilians are only a birth machine. The so-called Two-Child Policy is just the Party’s adjustment of the productivity of this machine. The people’s human rights have not been protected under the Birth Planning Policy, so naturally they won’t get any benefits in terms of freedom even if they are allowed one more child. Only when China completely abolishes this forceful birth planning policy and its coercive fines, publicizes all birth planning data and the amount of fines in the past decades, holds corrupt officials accountable, punishes those that illegally take away people’s lives, provides nation-wide compensation to women and families persecuted because of the birth planning policy and became disabled or even died, can China begin its first step towards living with dignity.

Viral Ad Sparks Outpouring for ‘Leftover Women’ in China

VOA Joyce Huang                   April 12, 2016

 

An emotional advertisement about “leftover women” in China, which has gone viral, has uncovered not only the society’s deep-rooted discrimination against single women, but also the Chinese government’s inaction in tackling gender inequity issues, analysts say.

The four-minute-long document-style video, part of Japanese cosmetic giant SK-II’s global campaign to inspire women to change their destiny, has resonated with many unwed Chinese women over the age of 27 as it brings out their fear of being stigmatized as “sheng nu” or “leftover women”.

In China, women are conventionally viewed as having an incomplete life if they remain unwed and are pressured into marrying in their 20s.

But on the social media site Weibo, there are more encouraging words than harsh criticism about “leftover women,” after the video attracted tens of thousands of clicks in just a few days.

User Na Mi Zi commented, “They’re under so much pressure, from a mundane point of view. But really, it’s more important to just be yourself and happy.”

Selena Liu, an unmarried woman in Beijing, told VOA, “What everyone is looking for is different. For me, I am looking for true love. And if it means that I don’t get married until I am in my late 30s or when I am 40, then that is ok.”

Chinese writer Yuan Ren wrote about the topic in her column for The Telegraph newspaper.

“For me, it’s the vicious attack on single Chinese women that really smarts. If you look at the latest SK-II ad… close family is usually where the most hurtful jabs fire.”

SK-II said in a statement that it was adopting a positive approach in helping Chinese women overcome pressure.

And the final message it aims to spread is that Chinese women today are more educated than ever before and are increasingly resisting marriage if being single allows them to achieve more in life, according to Leta Hong Fincher, author of Leftover Women: The Resurgence of Gender Inequality in China, who played a consulting role in the video.

FILE- A woman talks on phone inside the Bank of China head office building in Beijing, China March 30, 2016. Chinese women are increasingly putting careers ahead of marriage, data shows.

‘Grade A women vs. Grade D men’

China has more men than women, currently at a ratio of 107 to 100. United Nations data show the world average is 101 men for every 100 women. And among young children, the imbalance is startling – with about 115 boys born in China for every 100 girls.

China’s decades-old one-child policy seriously distorted the country’s gender balance.

According to Jiang Quanbao, a professor at Xi’an Jiaotong University’s institute for population and development studies, Chinese men had outnumbered women by 36 million in the past three decades before 2010 as an estimated population of 20 million baby girls had likely been aborted.

So, in theory, China should have few worries about so-called “leftover women.” On the contrary, “leftover men”, also known as “bare branches,” should be a bigger concern, as it is estimated that at least 24 million Chinese men will be left with no local women to marry in 2020.

Jiang says what is at stake is women are traditionally on the lookout for partners with a higher social status. Now that Chinese women are more educated and financially independent, there are just not enough men with high status, he said.

So the challenge facing Chinese singles today boils down to the mismatch between Grade A women and Grade D men, said professor Jiang.

“The Grade A women vs. Grade D men phenomenon means that ‘leftover women’ usually have a higher social status, while most ‘leftover men’ are socially-disadvantaged with a lower socio-economic status,” Jiang said, adding that the rising cost of a wedding and keeping a wife is the major obstacle for “bare branches” seeking marriage, especially those in rural China.

There is no easy fix to the structural mismatch. But professor Jiang is optimistic that, as time progresses, liberal-minded parents will be eased with the individual choice of their unwed daughters.

A woman (bottom) balances two men with her feet as students practice at an acrobatic school in Sanwang village, Anhui province, China, July 30, 2015. With a population of 1.37 billion, China has more men than women. The current ratio is at about 105:100.

Inside the box

But Zhang Jing, founder and executive director of Women’s Rights in China, disagreed. She says the sensation with “leftover women” is a big fight against the Communist government’s hidden agenda to keep women inside the box of marriage.

“[Many of] the government’s policies have worsened society’s discrimination against women and gender inequity,” she said, referring to some state-owned firms’ hiring of men only and preferred layoffs of female employees.

Zhang also criticized Chinese President Xi Jinping for his lack of vision in addressing gender inequity after he openly encouraged Chinese women to put family harmony first while speaking to the All-China Women’s Federation in 2013.

Zhang is concerned that regardless of its economic development, China’s growing discrimination against “leftover women” may persist for a long time.

“China has now become so rich. Theoretically, this is the best time for the Chinese government to encourage, promote and liberate women,” she said, adding, “But the current economic prosperity has brought no benefits to women. Women are those who are laid off first and those who return home to their cooking chores,” she added.

 

Editor’s note: One of the sources quoted in this story, Leta Hong Fincher, is a former VOA correspondent.

 

Forum on Women and Children’s Rights, Attendants Deeply Moved

Translater by  WRIC Volunteer Xu,Wen                     March 16, 2016

 

橫幅

March 15, 2016, two NGO organizations Women’s Rights in China (WRIC) and Women’s Rights Without Frontiers (WRWF) collaborated to hold “Form on the Rights of Chinese Women and Children” in New York. Nearly a hundred attendants including US-based human rights activists, scholars and journalists were at the forum.

Yujun Zhang, researcher of WRIC; Cheng Yao, staff director of WRIC’s Mainland Project; Eva, editor of “Fetuses Executed by State Policy”; Reggie Littlejohn, president of WRWF; and Jing Zhang, president of WRIC presented and examined the current situation of women’s rights in China, tracing the development of China’s Women’s Liberation Movement 20 years after the Beijing World Conference on Women, reviewing on how forced abortions affected the physical and psychological health of women and children since the One-Child Policy put into force 36 years ago, analyzing how the One-Child Policy is connected to child trafficking and international adoption.

 

Yi Wa7 A              Yi Wa 2 A

Dr. Gao Yaojie, the first Chinese medical expert in China to fight AIDS donated her 100 books to the attendants of the forum.

 

The forum also exhibited the book “Fetuses Executed by State Policy” edited by Eva and Peng Wang, and the book “Witness on Cannibalism” an oral 上history of Great Famine by Eva. WRIC has facilitated to publish two books under the China’s Family Planning series, including “Fetuses Executed by State Policy” and “Orphans of Shao” within the past two years. WRIC will continue to publish these non-fiction publications under the same theme, striving to thoroughly record the reality of how Chinese families, especially women and children suffered from this coercive enforcement of Family Planning.

Chinese human rights activist Cheng Yao, forced to flee China and recently arrived in the US, shared his own experience witnessing the tragedy of children being trafficked in China, compelled tears from the audience. Taiwanese attendant Ms Kwong said, “I have never heard of such people and stories, shocking and heartbreaking!”

The forum first featured a video speech from the well-known Chinese journalist Shangguan Jiaoming. He acknowledged WRIC and Ms. Jing Zhang for translating and publishing the English version of his book “Orphans of Shao” . This book detailed the real crimes of Family Planning officials in Shaoyang of Hunan Province, who kidnapped those “out-of-plan” children from their families to state-run orphanages, gave them new identities, and sold them for international adoptions.

 

张羽君发言             Yujun Zhang (see figure) summarized the development of China’s women rights movement with images and charts. She said that the coercive One-Child Policy launched in 1979 was the start of a disaster for Chinese women. Xi Jinping government did not improve but worsened the situation of women’s living condition, and put unprecedented pressure on feminist activists and NGO organizations, which made the Chinese women’s rights progress almost 100 years backwards.

 

 

 

Cheng Yao (see figure), real name Chunsheng Tan, Director of WRIC Mainland Project, recently escaped China and arrived in New York in January under the help of WRIC and WRWF. Cheng Yao shared his eight years of own experience joining WRIC and against human trafficking activities. He said that China’s large-scale child trafficking began in the early 1980s, since the implementation of Family Planning policies. “Traffickers sold childrenfrom poor areas of Yunnan, Guizhou and Sichuan Provinces to coastal areas such as Fujian and Guangdong. In mid 1990s, child trafficking gradually spread to the whole country. Now alliances of parents searching for their abducted 姚誠children have established in many provinces in China.” However, the Chinese Public Security Bureau did not really fight child trafficking. He said, “A lot of good solutions we recommended were disregarded by them. For example, when conducting a census, if you accurately register them and bring them to a DNA test, half of the abducted children would be able to find their birth parents. But they never do it. Why? Because the police helped to ‘washed the record’ and gave these childre
n new identities. The policy station must have got commission for doing this, and the counties household sector probably has responsibility too.”

Cheng Yao also said that the Chinese Public Security Bureau not only show little interest of finding the missing children, but also treat the parents alliances as target of  “weiwen” or “stability maintenance”. “Almost every parents went out in groups had been taken to the police, or even been detained” said Cheng Yao.

 

Reggie Littlejohn 发言             President of WRWF Reggies Littlejohn (see figure) pointed out that the Chinese government implemented Two-Child Policy is merely administrative measure dealing with labor shortage and the aging of population. Forced abortion and “out-of-plan” penalty were not abandoned by the new planning. Thus, people are still suffering.

Reggie also mentioned that her adopted daughters Anne and Lily (Chinese activists Zhang Lin’s two daughter) had been doing great and how proud she was of them. In 2013, Zhang Anne was denied the right to go to school in Hefei. This caused hundred of people and online commenters went on protest. More than ten people was arrested or persecuted by CCP government. So the founder of WRIC Jing Zhang contacted the Director of USUIB Ann Noonan, trying to help Anne out. They then called Reggie to see if there is someone who would want to adopt Anne in the US. Reggie discussed with her husband and gladly took the responsibility herself. Now Anne has been family to Reggie for two years. She is straight A students and just won award in an international piano competition. She is going to perform in the Carnegie Hall in December this year.

 

依娃发言    Eva          ═⌡┼⌠ Peng Wang

Eva (see figure) is the oral history researcher on the Great Famine, and editor of the book “Fetuses Executed by State Policy” published in 2016. This book collects eighty-four cases of forced abortions in China. Eva said that a country where women do not have control over their own uteri is a country of savagery and inhuman. Only a complete abolition of this “Planning” and fining policy can allow Chinese people to live with dignity. Eva also introduced the other editor of this book and Beijing-based human rights artist Peng Wang. They strive to arise people’s respect for human right and lives with words and art pieces.

 

4The last speaker is the founder and president of WRIC Jing Zhang. She screened a video of WRIC Mainland volunteers leading parents of missing children to look for their offspring . Anti-trafficking is one of WRIC’s important projects. She said that playing this video is to give Chinese people living in the US an idea of what WRIC does in China. Since the establishment of WRIC in 2007, we have been working low-key to speak and fight for the vulnerable and disadvantaged groups so that the CCP would not censoring out projects and activities; but after Xi Jinping came to office, all the NGO organizations were suppressed as foreign anti-government forces. Jing said that the rule of CCP has a solid social basis besides its national defense and economy foundation. The interest groups closely tied with CCP includes more than 87 million CCP members, 2 million active duty soldiers, 1.5 million armed police, 7 million reserve militia, 2 million regular police, 2.5 internet police, 7million cadres, and of course the large system of Family Planning Commission. Basically, these 200 million people’s job duties include being CCP’s watchdogs, following, bugging, informing and being the CCP hatchet men.

 

5張、姚代王默領獎
At the end of the forum, the National Committee of Democratic Party of China gave 2016 “Cao Shunli Courage” awards to Chinese human right activists Changlan Su and Mo Wang.

 

 

 

20 Years After the World Conference on Women: Chinese Women’s Rights Advancing with Difficulty

Source: WRIC                            Translated by Tony Flannery

???????????????????????????????

Jing Zhang attended the Democracy Forum of China in Australia and gave the speech about the Chinese women’s liberation movement.

In the beginning of the 1990s, while an economically-recovering China was anxious to join the international trend, there was a popular term in China at the time: “jie gui”—to get on track, to want to link up with the world again on all fronts. Hosting the 1995 World Conference on Women became a turning point, particularly for helping the Chinese government to gradually move away from the predicament of having been isolated by Western countries after the Tiananmen Incident in 1989. China actively hosted a large-scale international event, striving to participate more in international affairs. In 1991, after it had been decided that the World Conference on Women would be held in Beijing, the Chinese government began a large amount of preparation work, including revising the Law on the Protection of Rights and Interests of Women and signing the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. The official All-China Women’s Federation added over ten auxiliary groups. The 1995 World Conference on Women in Beijing’s Huairou district seemed like a shot in the arm, provoking long-silent leading Chinese female intellectuals to pursue feminism and inspiring them to reconsider gender, equal rights, and the women’s liberation movement. These exemplary women were the first to realize that “women’s rights are human rights too”. With the attention of government and society on women’s rights and the women’s liberation movement, it was as though a spring breeze had caressed the parched earth. Around the time of the World Conference on Women, Chinese NGOs had already developed into six groups. The women involved were the first group of pioneers of the women’s rights movement in over sixty years of Chinese communism. Of the cohort of women’s rights activists who have appeared since the year 2000, Sun Yat-sen University’s Professor Ai Xiaoming is regarded as the primary promoter of grassroots women’s rights movements.

The deepest effect that the World Women’s Forum brought China was the rise of NGOs and loosely knit groups of grassroots women’s rights activists. Unfortunately, the government strictly controlled these groups, not letting NGOs make use of their full capabilities. It suppressed the loosely knit groups of grassroots women’s rights activists, which disabled the effective implementation of related legislation, thereby wiping out its essential meaning. Next I will divide the last several decades, particularly after the Beijing World Women’s Forum, into aspects such as political, economic, social, cultural, and the rise of NGOs to discuss the state of development for Chinese feminism and the women’s liberation movement. The data cited are all statistics published by official or semi-official Chinese organizations. It is believed that in the relevant departments, the data underwent strict screening to be approved for publication, based on the rules of the state’s Official Secrets Act.

The Misshapen Women’s Rights Movement during the Cultural Revolution

100 years ago, as various powers invaded China, they also brought with them western civilization. Chinese female intellectuals quickly cast off the burden of foot-binding and stood out in the street proclaiming new ideas of gender equality. They actively participated in the New Culture Movement and turned the page on the international media’s stereotypes. From 1912 to 1913, the female political participation movement of the early republican period initiated by Tang Qunying and other pioneering women was China’s first large-scale women’s rights movement. These women pushed straight from the stage of theoretical proof to the stage of practical struggle. One after another, they organized the three great women’s organizations: the Women’s Political Alliance, the Shenzhou [a historical name for China] Women’s World Republican Association, and the All Nations Women’s Political Participation Forum. According to accounts, because of the Nationalist government’s program to remove wording about gender equality, these women even publicly denounced Song Jiaoren, political leader and a founder of the Kuomintang, and Lin Sen, Chairman of the National Government. After this, the female political participation movement that these women promoted allowed ten female representatives in Guangdong to sit straight and strong in seats of provincial parliament, the first time this had been seen in any Asian country. The Chinese women’s liberation movement was basically in step with the international community’s, particularly in countries like England, France, and America. But a succession of civil and international wars killed the feminist zeitgeist in its cradle and destroyed the essence of the New Culture Movement. The women’s rights movement seemed like a flash in the pan.

Picture27          Picture26

This is a principle of China’s traditional beauty standard for women: feet had to be three inches small to be the most beautiful (WRIC Information)”

Picture28

The 1921 New Culture Movement (Source: traditions.cultural-china.com)

After the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) established a new regime in 1949, a clause on gender equality was added to the new constitution because of Marxist doctrine’s abundant feminist elements. By substantiating the theoretical basis of the socialists at the level of reality, the demands of gender equality were also essential ingredients for the new rulers of modern history to begin placating the nation. The first constitution enacted in 1954 expressly stipulated that women enjoy the same rights as men in politics, economy, culture, society, and family life. But a few decades after this, Chinese women’s rights and benefits were defiled until there was nothing left. The only thing society respected was the might of Mao Zedong. After Mao launched the political movement of the Cultural Revolution, his wife Jiang Qing raised the banner of gender equality anew to achieve her own political ambitions. As part of the “Chairman Mao” convoy, the first lady reached the forefront of the political arena. Together with Vice Chairman Lin Biao’s wife Ye Qun, she entered the upper echelon of the Central Committee’s Politburo. From there she used government force to spread a fake feminism with the goal of political struggle. Chinese women regarded floral clothes, high heels, makeup, and perms as disgraceful. All over the country on giant propaganda signs seen everywhere were formidable-looking women, women wearing hard hats or standing on electrical poles. But another equally ubiquitous image made a strong contrast with this one: women with black signs hung from their necks with “slut” and “whore” written on them, women trussed up and standing on flatbed trucks or paraded through the streets on foot to be pelted with rocks and rubble and spat upon by adults and children. Ten years into the Cultural Revolution, women who had been humiliated and abused to the point of madness or death were everywhere.

In 1976, Mao died and the era of Mao was proclaimed over. China entered the first round of a new phase with Deng Xiaoping in total control of political power. After the economy had been revitalized, women’s rights and benefits were once again cast into the eighteenth level of hell [the deepest level of Buddhist hell].

The Number of Women in Politics Has Gone Down, Not Up in 30 Years

Data from the third “Social Status of Women” investigative report by the All-China Women’s Federation show that in the more than 30 years from the 1975 Fourth National People’s Congress to 2012, the proportion of female representatives at the People’s Congress always hovered around 21%. It wasn’t until 2013 that there was an increase in the number of female representatives to 23.4%, a far cry from the 30% proposed by the UN for female participation in the national legislature by 2015. 2.2% of employed women are in leadership roles in government organizations, party committees, and businesses—barely 50% of the corresponding rate for employed men. 80.5% of high-level company employees are men, while at 30.8% of these companies, men are promoted faster than equally qualified women. The All-China Women’s Federation report also reveals that the proportion of women in the People’s Congress has slid sharply in the international ranking of the proportion of female legislators, from sixteenth place in 1997 to fifty-sixth place.

In April 2010, the UN allocated 24,560,000 USD to Hunan to conduct the “Enhancing Chinese Women’s Political Participation” program hoping to improve China’s unfulfilled promise to increase the proportion of women in politics. This four-year program has already finished, but up to the present we have not seen whether there were any practical results.

In the absence of real legal safeguards, the issue of promoting female political participation in China is beyond difficult. On top of that, in an environment rife with official corruption, the process of concrete implementation or operation will naturally have a large amount of fraud, as well as cases of public persecution. Throughout this whole process, women are severely deprived of the right to participate in and discuss politics.

In Guangdong’s Foshan, female villager Li Biyun’s bitter experience with demanding political participation is a typical case. At the end of August, 2011, Foshan City’s Shunde District began elections for district- and town-level representatives to the National People’s Congress. Li Biyun exercised her right as a citizen and announced that she would run for Shunde People’s Congress representative as an independent candidate. Because Li Biyun had long paid attention to the villagers and helped defend their land rights, she was well-respected. She received the supporting signatures of 600 villagers in Rongli and became one of the candidates. Without a political background or party membership, she was followed, harassed, beaten up, and even robbed of her belongings and materials. During the next round of the election, the local election office used an illegal procedure to assign 60 people to narrow down the candidates further, and the frontrunner Li Biyun was thrown out. This provoked intense controversy among the villagers, and in the midst of the controversy someone smashed a ballot box and a scuffle broke out in which both sides sustained minor injuries.

In September 2011, Shunde police arrested Li Biyun for undermining the election. While in jail she suffered injuries from police beatings. When she met with her lawyer, she held an IV in one hand and her legs were in shackles. When Li Biyun’s case went to court, hundreds gathered holding slogans in support of her. On September 9, 2013, her charge of “undermining an election” was judged unsound and she was released.

One month later, in October 2013, the police once again used the crime of “interference with public function” to arrest and detain her. Because of netizen and media attention, on December 18, 2014 her punishment was remitted. When she was released, the police kidnapped her from jail and left her by the side of a highway. At this point she was sick, angry, and in extremis. The 46 year-old Li Biyun’s body was wracked with pain, and in January 2015 she was hospitalized for treatment.

Picture29

Left: Li Biyun in the hospital. (Provided by Li Biyun’s family)

Separately, a steelworker named Liu Ping in Jiangxi’s Xinyu City also suffered the unfairness of elections. Comparatively speaking, she wasn’t physically tormented like Li Biyun; that may be a difference between cities and rural areas. Liu Ping was born in 1964, and in 2009 was forced to retire. At the time she was 45. Since then she has advocated for paid leave and overtime pay. On May 12, 2011, Liu Ping announced that she would run for People’s Congress and introduced herself to voters. In response, she was taken away by the police and warned. The water and electricity in her house were cut off, and voters who recommended Liu Ping were all sought out by the police for “chats.” As a result, her supporters grew afraid, which harmed her candidacy. In the end, Liu Ping did not cross the threshold for candidacy, but her story did provoke public anger among netizens. This case reflects the fact that at a basic level, the government is extremely hostile to independent candidates, and making things hard for them by any means available is a widespread phenomenon. In 2014, Liu Ping was sentenced to six years in prison for holding a sign in the street demanding that Chinese high officials disclose their property holdings. (Listen to Liu Ping discuss her struggles running for office at http://youtu.be/llTVgEqsDTo.) A woman running as an independent candidate is doubly beaten down. On the one hand, male supremacy is deep-seated among current leaders, who have mixed feelings about women candidates who are not at home cooking and raising children. On the other hand, independent candidates who lack party membership and the support of party organizations will face layer after layer of impossibly difficult questioning. From the day they decide to run, they are at a disadvantage.

Going through records of the past 66 years’ of women’s participation in the highest government positions, there were a total of 6 women in the CCP Politburo, and three were wives of the founding fathers of the People’s Republic of China. On average, there was only one woman every 11 years. 90 years since the establishment of the CCP, no woman has been able to enter the highest decision-making body, the Standing Committee of the Politburo. Within the 7 members of the current decision-making level of the Politburo of Xi Jinping, there are no women as well. Among the 31 provinces of China, there have only been 4 female provincial leaders within the past 66 years, appearing on average every 16.5 years. In contrast, by the time in which the 1995 World Conference on Women was held, there were already 3 female Prime Ministers in the Arab world. The female Prime Minister of Pakistan even appointed the first female Chief Justice. Up until now, there have been dozens of female presidents and Prime Ministers in the world.

In rural areas, women account for 65% of the labor force, but occupy only 21.4% of membership in village committees, and only 1 to 2% of decision-making positions. Since 1978, the proportion of women in the National People’s Congress has hovered around 21%. This number has continued for 30 years without any substantive advance. From the Chinese government’s published data in the table below, we can see that female representation in the National People’s Congress is severely inadequate and ethnic minority representation in the National People’s Congress has not changed in 60 years. Even though the minority population has been increasing, the degree of political participation has been strictly controlled at around 14%.

Picture30

Statistics from the Women’s Federation in October, 2011 show that the economic, social and political status gained by women 10 years after the establishment of the PRC has experienced a regression. The Global Gender Gap Report issued by the World Economic Forum ranked China the 69th among 136 countries. Jiang Yongping from All-China Women’s Federation’s Women’s Studies Institute of China remarked that more and more people accept that women’s status has fallen because “it is more difficult for women to become politicians.” Political participation of women can influence people’s way of thinking. Female heads of state can utilize political power to promote the visibility of female political participation directly and quickly. After Sri Lanka’s first female president took office, she appointed a large number of female officials. As far back as the early 1990s, Norway’s female prime minister formulated a stipulation for the Labor Party that women could not account for less than 40% of all levels of leadership. Northern Europe is the region where female political participation has the highest visibility; it has basically achieved gender equality in politics and is a model for all countries.

The One-child Policy Inaugurates the Bleakest Period in Women’s Rights

In 1978, Deng Xiaoping implemented the “loosening up” policy and China’s economy began to warm up. An Indian summer of freedom briefly appeared in Chinese society: people could boldly criticize past politicians and expose the dark side of society. However, this did not cause the government’s attention to turn to Chinese women’s rights and benefits, nor was there any special assistance for women to participate in economic laws and policies. Among the CCP’s highest-level policymakers there was not even one woman. There were no female ministers in the Central Committee’s various ministries. There were dozens of provincial leaders, none of them women. Even women mayors were rarely seen. Female representatives in the National People’s Congress were few and far between. If we can say that the Cultural Revolution was when slogans of gender equality were shouted with the greatest vigor in the communist era, then after Deng Xiaoping’s economic liberalization, these slogans and the notion of women’s rights were given the highest-sounding send-off into the eighteenth level of hell.

In particular, after 1979’s nationwide forced miscarriages, forced abortions, and forced tubal ligations [sterilization] under the one-child policy, it was as though ordinary Chinese women (particularly rural women) were living in an earthly purgatory. On the one hand, pregnant women had to risk their lives trying to give birth to sons to preserve their marital homes and please their husbands because the consequences of having a girl were severe. It meant facing a lifetime of indignity and remaining undaunted. On the other hand, women had to evade arrest and abuse at the hands of family planning officials. After having the roof of their houses lifted up and everything within smashed, they still needed to come up with a plan to let all their family members survive. 30 years from 1978 to the present, living examples of families ruined by family planning policies are in every corner of Chinese cities and villages and in every street and alley. In 2013, 14 female lawyers jointly petitioned for 31 provinces to publicize decades of family planning fine accounts. Only 22 provinces’ Family Planning Commissions responded. In 2012, the total family planning fines received totaled 16.8 billion RMB, and of this amount, the fines reported by the Guangdong Family Planning were unexpectedly 1.1 billion RMB less than the fines reported by the provincial planning commission. As the government treats family planning policies and related information as state secrets, the degree to which the policy implementation has devastated Chinese women and children, including the testing processes and results from birth control medication, remain unknown to the outside world. Just what has been exposed through all manner of individual cases has revealed a panorama of horror. Two full generations of women, a population of up to several hundred million, have been deprived by the Party of their rights of ownership and control over their own bodies.

According to data from the Ministry of Health’s 2010 annual statistical report, in 1983, 14,371,843 Chinese women had induced abortions, 16,398,378 underwent tubal ligation, and 17,755,736 used intrauterine birth control. These data are only what the government itself published, and do not include data of the large number of pharmaceutical abortions popularized by traditional Chinese clinics, at-home traditional abortions, or the surgical abortions carried out in remote rural areas without proper hygiene and on ad-hoc operating tables. At the time, from the Central Committee out to the provinces, cities, and counties, the All-China Women’s Federation was China’s only women’s organization. Not only did it not help victimized women speak out, it instead often cooperated with the enforcers of family planning, arresting illegally pregnant women everywhere. It was reduced to being an accomplice in the persecution of women.

Equality in politics was completely ignored. From central to local government, no one publicly encouraged or promoted the female right to participate in and discuss politics, nor did any female politicians stand up and criticize human rights violations and harm to women’s behavior. In 2006 the government built the Chinese Museum of Women and Children, but in the exhibition hall, it went so far as to make no mention of these things that affected such a broad sweep [of society]: the policies and birth planning tools, drugs, methods, personnel, fines, and relevant data that impacted 270 million families and hundreds of millions of women. It completely ignored this period in history that lasted several decades and hurt the hundreds millions of women. The foremost female intellectuals had no opportunity to participate in politics, which was the same as not having the right to speech. Without equal political status, women were just sheep to the slaughter in a society of men’s rights. The gender equality slogans popular during the Mao era were not shouted at all during the Deng era, not even emptily.

WRIC volunteers interviewed a family whose pregnant mother died after the local Family Planning Commission forcibly induced labor. On October 14, 2011 in Jiangjia Village of Shandong’s Dongying City, Lijin County, a female villager named Ma Jihong was seven months pregnant when she was taken from the cotton fields and given a forced abortion, leading to a tragedy in which two lives were lost in a single body.

Picture31Picture32

The picture above left is Ma Jihong and her seven month-old baby, both of whom died in hospital. The picture above right is Ma Jihong and her husband’s wedding photo. The picture below shows Ma Jihong’s husband and daughter.


Picture33

Patriarchal Culture Revives after “Loosening up” Economic Control.

Deng Xiaoping’s series of policies “Loosening control of the central government,” triggered the rise of the Chinese economy. Women from cities and rural areas worked hard, believing what the government told them: “the right to food is more important than any other human rights”. After opening up, economic reforms once again caused polarization within the Chinese society. Women from different classes lost their rights in the resource distribution oriented by the market. In the 1990s, while Deng’s “Black Cat, White Cat” theory of economic development replaced the socialist principle of economic distribution, female workers were dismissed and lost the opportunity to participate in the economy. In cities and corporations, female cadres are the first targets to be eliminated. Recruiting female students and workers were called “mixing coarse grains”. As the effects of the economic reforms deepened, sex discrimination became more public and common, and patriarchal culture regained force.

In the eligibility for candidates of the Hunan province civil servants exam, there are regulations that specifically pinpoint women, e.g. candidates that have sexually-transmitted diseases or asymmetrical breasts will not be accepted. Many female workers were dismissed and many large companies and foreign corporations only employ women in their “golden years”, limiting their age to 17-20 years old, with contracts that generally last 3-5 years, terminated after completion to avoid female workers’ age of marriage, pregnancy and delivery. Some institutions even set regulations in black and white that female workers cannot become pregnant during their employment.  It was not until 2014 that a TV host from a well-known company in China and a female journalist from a famous media group told me that they both signed contracts with their units that forced them to guarantee that they would not get married within the next three years and would not have a baby within the next five years.

Female university graduates face difficulties in employment. The third survey on “Social Status of Women” conducted by the All-China Women’s Federation and the Statistics Bureau on 1 December, 2010 interviewed female university graduates about their experience in job searching, and 24.7% said they had been treated unfairly before. Even among women in higher positions of their job, 19.8% thought that their gender is an obstacle towards career advancement.

In tertiary institutions, there are written guidelines that the minimum marks for admission for boys and girls are different: the threshold for female students is higher. Some departments emphasize that they do not accept girls. The “211 Project: Report on Gender Discrimination in School Admissions in 2013” published on the Media Monitor for Women Network randomly investigated 112 tertiary institutions and found that almost 70% had limitations based on gender. Some universities have admission rules and regulations with clear statements such as “recommended for male candidates,” “suitable for male students” or “suitable for female students”. These make candidates hesitate.

In 1998, China implemented joint policies to improve the quality of labor, laying off redundant workers in factories, mines and corporations. Among these laid-off workers, 70% were female (The Maple Women’s Psychological Counseling Center Beijing: http://www.maple.org.cn/tabid/76/Default.aspx). A huge number of female workers were dismissed and became unemployed. Different levels of the government made use of the reason of “improving efficiency” to withdraw their social welfare services from corporations, such as canteens, daycare centers and kindergartens of various units, forcing them to close down. A large group of married women thus could only leave the job market and return home to take care of their children.

On the other hand, sexual division of labor became rampant once again: married women mainly work in the agricultural field and take care of small villages and their family. Young women strive to enter foreign-invested and jointly-invested factories in economically-developed coastal areas, working overtime in toxic environments without medical insurance and welfare. Long-established joint ventures around the Shenzhen area have about 70% of young, single female workers. What makes it worse is the government’s unjust retirement system, which makes it perfectly justifiable for employers to cut off job opportunities for women at an early age: a large amount of women are forced to leave the job market once they reach 45 years old, and can only go home to take care of their children and cook. This retirement system drafted by the State Council has been in use for 50 years. The “Temporary Regulation of Civil Servants” issued in 1993 still states that “men retire at 60 years old, women retire at 55 years old”. Corporations and institutions that emphasize physical labor and are less effective require their female workers to retire at 45 years old, causing women to lose chances of promotion and further prospects due to policies and systematic injustice. The loss of economic independence leads to the loss of equal status in society and the family. Work is an important channel for women to sustain connection with society and a basic way for women to participate in societal development.

Female migrant workers and “migrant brides” that return to their home village after “marrying into” different towns have no human rights whatsoever. Women make up 65% of the agricultural workforce and are an important drive in advancing agricultural modernization and new models of urbanization that emphasize harmonious interactions between the city and the countryside. Migrant brides lose their land ownership and shares in collectives. The coastal areas are better-off and government and private corporations conduct large-scale projects to buy land. Yet the right for returning “migrant brides” to the use of their land or to natural resources in collectives, the compensation, relocation, ownership of land occupied for residential use, and the dividends and shares received after collective farmland are sold are still unfairly distributed. The rights of returning “migrant brides” are not protected by law; the relevant laws on gender equality issued by the State Council are only mere scraps of paper as there are numerous village rules seriously violating the rights of returning “migrant brides”, such as that to receive compensation for their lost land. Thus a new group was formed among petitioners: “defenders for returning migrant brides”. Although returning “migrant brides” used rational, peaceful and non-violent methods to defend their rights, their problems were not solved and they were even arbitrarily detained. Not only did they fail to protect their rights, they lost their personal freedom and were intimidated. For example, 6 representatives of returning “migrant brides” in Foshan, Guangdong were detained by the police in January, 2014.

Picture35Picture36

 Picture34

Wong Zhuliu, representative of defenders of returning “migrant brides” holds her “Written Decision of Administrative Penalty” and tells WRIC volunteer Su Changlan at her home about the injustice she faced (photo credit: WRIC volunteer Su Changlan)

Rural Girls: the Most Vulnerable Group

In the Chinese government’s treatment of girls, the difference between cities—especially large cities—and rural areas is night and day. In remote mountain areas, education, health, and cultural activities for rural impoverished girls are almost nonexistent. Chinese official statistics show that there are 61,255,000 “left-behind children” who do not have parents present for long periods. 37.7% of rural children and 21.88% of all children nationwide are left-behind children, and 52,900,000 of them are 14 or younger.

The statistics show that at least 2 million children are living on their own. Their parents go to the cities to make money on the low-priced migrant worker market. Most rural girls are deprived of education. In regards to girls suffering sexual assault from fellow villagers or friends and relatives, cases of gang rape are often exposed in the online media, but the rapes of far more girls are hidden in the darkness of the villages, unknown to anyone. In 2013, a left-behind girl in rural Henan was raped by a 61 year-old fellow villager. It was not until she was eight months pregnant that her parents, migrant workers in Hangzhou, found out.

In a village in Guizhou’s Luzhi Special Economic Area, after Little Dan’s parents divorced, both went off in search of work. Little Dan lived with her 70 year-old grandparents, cold and hungry. In 2014, the 12 year-old Little Dan was “introduced” to a man in the village as an “adopted” child bride. Her parents did even not know until they rushed back to the village for a funeral to discover the girl had already “gotten married.” A villager said, “It’s a good thing for Little Dan to marry into another house. At home she can’t even eat her fill.” (Henan Business Daily)

WRIC volunteers exposed a tragic true story. It was a typical case of a policy problem leading to rural girls meeting heartbreaking misfortune. In Anhui Province’s Susong County, within Liuping Town’s Daban Village, there were three sisters in Deng Lurong’s family. Because their mother was unable to provide a son, she blamed herself and disappeared. The girls’ father Deng Jiechao moved far away to remarry and had a son. To evade the family planning officials’ large fine, he has not returned to the village, abandoning the three young girls to live with their grandma. As a result, their grandma was locked up by family planning officials to bring Deng Jiechao back. One night in April 2002, a young male villager named Deng Yunfei stole into the Deng home and forcibly raped the 12 year-old Deng Lurong. The three sisters were so scared that they screamed and cried. On the second day, the sisters went to where their grandma was locked up and reported the rape. After their grandma was released to return home, she found that the police and the public did nothing about the reported case, and became so angry that she fell ill and died. The three young sisters were left with no one to rely on. Not long after, Deng Lurong’s 15 year-old sister and her youngest sister, who was only about nine years old, were sold to a child trafficker by a male acquaintance. To this day there has been no news of them, and Deng Lurong, who was in a daze after suffering the attack, was sold into another village to be the wife of a poor bachelor 20 years older than her. She suffered a long torment there. After having two sons, her husband ordered her to go and be a sex slave for other men in the village. Each time she earned 10 to 20 RMB, all of which her husband collected. Often after being beaten she would hide in the mountains, sleeping outside and living like an animal. According to our understanding, after this Deng Lurong’s father returned to the village and reached an agreement with the local government. After he received 80,000 RMB in hush money, it was as though nothing had ever happened. The vanished, dead, sold, and tormented women and girls of the family were totally forgotten.

WRIC volunteers made many inquiries and even brought a reporter from a German magazine to do interviews, hoping that a record of this would cause the local government to take it seriously and that afterwards the volunteers would be able to see Deng Lurong’s face and see if there had been any slight improvement in her living situation. However, who knows whether her treatment would have returned to its original state after the volunteers left? Yet even today the Chinese government and National People’s Congress legislature cannot enact legislation for a Law to Safeguard Child Welfare. Nor can they use existing laws to safeguard children’s rights, particularly the rights of rural girls, and strictly punish those criminals who violate children’s rights.

Picture37

A WRIC volunteer finally saw Deng Lurong, who was hiding in a dark room feeding her child, unwilling to come out (Photo credit: WRIC volunteer Tan Chunsheng)

Picture38

Deng Jiechao’s younger brother selfishly sold off three of his own nieces and even harshly threatened the journalist and WRIC volunteers who paid him a visit. (Photo credit: WRIC volunteer Tan Chunsheng)

Even though some official women’s organizations have tried to help urban women who have suffered domestic violence, they have been unable to achieve real results. On April 30, 2009, Nanjing’s first domestic violence shelter opened its doors in the city’s aid station. In over a year, only two people seeking help stayed there. (From the May 15, 2010 Nanjing Daily story “How to open a protective umbrella for victims of domestic violence”) In March of 2000 in Liaoning Province, the women’s federation took the lead in establishing the country’s first provincial-level women’s shelter, calling it the “Women’s Refuge Station.” Each year, it receives more than 2000 petitions from women affected by domestic violence. Yet in six years it has only accepted slightly more than 300 “harmed women,” an average of four people each month. On October 17, 2002, Dalian’s anti-domestic violence aid shelter formally opened. In the last half year, of the over 1600 women who came to petition, not one was admitted. (From the October 3, 2011 Youth Weekend story: “Domestic violence shelters everywhere most likely forced to dismiss abused women; admission rare”) In Changsha, Hunan Province, the domestic violence shelter has been open for two months without a single person coming to request help (from the January 2, 2011 Legal Daily story: “Changsha’s domestic violence shelter is celebrated but not drawing crowds”). Based on statistics published by the All-China Women’s Federation, in the Women’s Federation system there are 3450 organizations providing shelter and assistance for women and children who have suffered domestic violence, and over 25,000 women and children have received aid and shelter. On average, each shelter organization has only admitted 7.3 women or children.

In reality, the problem of women suffering domestic violence is extremely serious. In November 2014 at the Media Dialog against Domestic Violence held in Beijing, the “Chinese Gender Violence and Male Attitudes Study” released there showed that among females age 18-49 who have or have had partners, 39% reported suffering physical or sexual violence from their partners. Over nine-tenths of these women chose to remain silent. Why is it that more and more women admit facing domestic violence yet such a pitifully small number are admitted to the shelters? The primary reason is that the requirements to qualify for shelter admission are stringent. Women who have been abused must, at the time of suffering abuse, gather identification documents, hospital and residence information, and other relevant documents and provide these to each organization before they can be admitted.

There is a series of other planned projects to care for girls. In “two-girl families” (one household with two daughters) in rural areas, families would receive a subsidy when building their homes. The parents and adult daughters (one or two) of struggling households with only daughters (one or two) would receive free training, small loans, affordable housing, and more. In a time of rampant corruption, real struggling two-girl families cannot get effective long-term assistance. The ones who profit most are the leaders who go to the countryside for inspections with the media following close behind. When the inspection ends, everything goes back to the way it was. In the last two years, many provinces have set up “Safe Islands” to care for abandoned children. Most have disappeared. After wide media coverage of “abandoned child safe islands,” there was a brief time in which every major city’s medical units constructed humane, caring, and fully equipped lodging for abandoned children. However, a few months or a year later they closed one after another due to a lack of funding and too many abandoned children. However, it is always better to have people do and try than to be apathetic. After all, this is not only a type of humane care. It is also a type of publicity channel that strengthens the culture of gender equality.

The State Council announced its second anti-trafficking plan “The National Plan of Action on Combating Trafficking in Women and Children (2013-2020)”. In 2013, the Ministry of Public Security solved 4537 cases of trafficking of women and 2237 cases of child trafficking. Similar to statistics related to Birth Planning, actual statistics of trafficking cases are under “The State Secrets Law” and non-transparent. The numbers of unresolved and unreported cases of missing, abducted and trafficked persons are unknown to the public. The U.S. State Department’s Trafficking in Persons Report in 2014 has classified China as Tier 2 in compliance of “minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking” (the worst ranking is Tier 3).

Legislation and policies toward maternity leave in China’s various local governments have the most effective implementation. The 62nd provision of the Labor Law states that female workers may enjoy not less than 90 days of maternity leave. Nearly all of China’s female workers can enjoy this treatment. This is the most beautiful vista in all work to protect women and children’s rights. Professional women in America commonly rest for three days after giving birth and then return to work.

Prostitution Statistics Hit Record High in 60 Years

In the area of marriage and family, women face problems in terms of assets and personal freedom. According to statistics from the Women’s Federation, among the 207 million families in China, 30% of women face domestic violence, and 90% of the abusers are men. Wives that lose economic status often have to bear in silence when their husbands abuse or humiliate them and have to tolerate when they find out that their husbands are having affairs. The domestic violence case by the well-known Li Yang shocked the Chinese society two years ago. This famous man beat his American wife until her nose was bruised and face was swollen, but not only did he feel unashamed, he even publicly noted proudly that he was thoroughly punishing Americans. It was unbelievable that some people even praised him. In China, women who depend on husbands to sustain the family and are full-time housewives are rarely treated equally and with respect in the family and society. They are the most vulnerable victims of domestic violence. On another level, the violence that women have suffered from these decades not only comes from within the family, but from the government as well: birth planning officials and workers supported by the government inflict mental and physical harm on them. Once women are discovered to have unplanned pregnancies or have given birth illegally, they will lose dignity completely, be humiliated in public and be forced into hospitals or clinics, especially in townships. Pregnant women are often tied to operation tables by male birth planning officials, who allow people to do whatever they want to these women’s wombs and their newborn babies.

Recently, due to rapid economic development, the language of consumerism became popular and the media is inundated with male-centered beauty standards, which place the focus on women’s body parts. The female body becomes a symbol of desire and a carrier exaggerated by the media that forces women to consciously change their image to fulfill high social standards and strive to search for the easiest way to make a living. Thus, many young women leave factories and go to night clubs, massage parlors, and other venues for bathing and foot massages. Now a popular nation-wide “trend” is formed: becoming concubines that live on rich men’s money. Wealthy, powerful men pay for a whole group of concubines, and Chinese women are pushed into regression to their primitive form 100 years ago. News reports reveal that a large number of corrupted officials have concubines, with some that even have almost a hundred “lovers”. The phenomenon of prostitution not only revived, but rose to greater levels. Seeing that women work hard but do not gain the same rewards, young girls, regardless of their education level, naturally turn to easier ways to earn money and willingly become concubines of wealthy or powerful men, or even become involved in prostitution or drug trafficking. According to media reports, the number of prostitutes reached 20 million in 2013, the highest number in Chinese history.

The number of Chinese women trafficked in groups by criminal rings to foreign countries for sex work is increasing, and Western governments are pressured to combat the phenomenon. Since 10 years ago, the New York police have been directing large-scale raids on areas of illegal sex work in Flushing. Prostitution activities were then moved to the better-off area on Long Island, but again got caught by the police. Photos of the sex workers were sent to the media in Chinese communities and many Chinese newspapers raced to put them in print.

I remember it was about 2006 when I was still an editor for an established Chinese newspaper in New York. I had an argument with a supervisor in our editorial department about printing out the photos of the sex workers. I was suspected to be abusing my power to stop the 7 photos of the Chinese women from appearing in our newspaper, but I persisted: if we were to publish their photos, why don’t we show the faces of the johns? Of course, in my work thereafter, I could only guarantee that no such photos would appear on the pages I was responsible for. I was not able to control how other editors dealt with these photos. After all, there were more men than women in the editorial department, and the head was always a man. On 6 February, 2015, the Paris police announced that they uncovered a large website that provided Chinese call girls in Paris. There were people responsible for every aspect of the website, and they hired about 200 call girls, all of which were Chinese, to serve wealthy Chinese men.

Drugs are closely related to prostitution. The Chinese government has not publicized specific statistics on female drug addicts and drug trafficking, but from news reports, we can see that women are involved in every procedure, including making drugs, packaging, logistics and sales. In 2011, Hunan province launched a large-scale anti-drug campaign called “Mothers Against Drugs: Blue Knot Campaign”, which held promotional activities for 29000 times, established 34000 Mothers Against Drugs Associations, and recruited 520000 Mothers Against Drugs (Statistics from Hunan Annals). Yet, Hunan Province is far from the most popular place for drug dealers, who often gather in Yunan, Guizhou and flock to the coastal areas near Guangdong.

The Ministry of Police publicized general statistics in May, 2013, indicating that the total number of drug addicts in China has reached 2220000 (http://news.eastday.com/c/20130702/u1a7493816.html). The prevalence of drugs harms women, especially mothers. Many young women with low education levels face difficulties in finding jobs and are treated unfairly in many places. At last, they sell their bodies, become sex slaves or cross the line and become criminals.

Decades of implementation of the Birth Planning Policy has led to a much smaller female population when compared to males, but the social status of women has not improved. Instead it had fallen rapidly, further weakening women as a group, leading to their lack of self-confidence and overreliance on men, usually husbands or lovers. The main reason for the regression is inequality in political participation: there are no powerful female figures and organizations to speak out for women, reveal the inequality in economic distribution, point out the harms of patriarchal society, promote feminist ideology, advance the women’s liberation movement and advocate for legal reforms to punish acts of gender discrimination. In contrast, powerful male figures can nearly ruin 100 years of achievements in Chinese women’s liberation with only a few sentences. In October 2013, Xi Jinping emphasized the female household role in a speech to the All-China Women’s Federation, saying that “women must conscientiously shoulder the burden of caring for young and old and the responsibility of educating sons and daughters. In building a virtuous home they play their role.” As a result, thousands of women’s organizations, from Beijing to the provinces, cities, counties, and villages, have launched a wave of study, even directly calling on women to study Confucianism, laundry, and cooking because “a woman’s place is the home.” This implies that China’s highest leader is encouraging a kind of reversal, reversing 100 hard-fought years of the women’s liberation movement to the 19th century. In other words, Xi Jinping is demanding that females “proactively” assume the role of harmonious homemaker, meaning even if women see their husbands with three wives and four concubines, for the harmony of the home they will not make a sound. They will just make the food, raise the kids, and stay fixed to the homemaker role. If Xi Jinping said what his predecessors were unwilling to say to the public, feminists cannot help but ask, in Xi Jinping’s view, what is men’s role in the home? Wouldn’t having Chinese women all bind their feet again better suit the female image in Chairman Xi’s mind?

NGOs Strive to Survive Through Cracks

The issue on gender came out of the theoretical work of the second-wave feminist movement, and is also the core of policies emphasized in the 1995 World Conference on Women. Gender is a fair standard used to examine the civilization level of a nation’s policy and society. The six well-established NGOs formed after the 1995 conference includes the Shaanxi Women, Marriage and Family Studies Institute, Beijing Center for Cultural Development of Rural Women, Women and Children’s Psychological Counseling and Legal Aid Service Center of Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Henan Community Education Research Center, the Maple Women’s Psychological Counseling Center Beijing and the Beijing Zongze Area Women’s Legal Aid Center (formerly Legal Studies and Service Center for Women of the Law Department of Beijing University), which received abundant funding from different sources. The characteristics of operation of these NGOs are: first, they are affiliated with a government department; second, they rely heavily on the background of their leader, i.e. the personal networks formed through the government position they work for at the same time or worked for in the past, such as Zongze Center’s founder Guo Jianmei, who resigned from her job within the government system. After handling “sensitive” cases such as advocating for Deng Yujiao and Li Ruirui, she received strong responses from the public but her center was closed down by Beijing University. Experiencing many tribulations, the center finally changed its name to Zongze Area Women’s Legal Aid Center. These NGOs basically operate in the areas of research, legal aid and psychological counseling and focus on co-operation with the government. Without saying it out loud, they categorize their effort and the success they obtain as results gained by the government units within the system, then they can fulfill their project aims. Guo describes the process: we were pulling a heavy car in the strong wind, climbing up a slope. Yet compared to NGOs that focused on actions, advocated on the streets and became established later, these older NGOs were less frequently attacked, disbanded and arrested by the government.

A fiercer activist is clear-cut feminist Ai Xiaoming, professor of Sun Yat-sen University, who fought against many forces for the opportunity to voice out for the vagina by writing and directing the Chinese version of “The Vagina Monologues”. The play made its debut at the Guangdong Museum of Art in December 2003 and received strong responses from the public. She fought against the tide and won the chance to perform in various schools, which influenced a large group of feminist followers. All these years, she has been filming videos on site to protect women’s rights, speaking out for women who faced injustice. She also advocated for children’s rights and rallied for activists who exposed the illegal construction of “tofu-dregs” schoolhouses which led to students’ death in the Wenchuan Earthquake, such as Tan Zuoren and Ai Weiwei. Her half-naked statement photo, which was forwarded vividly by netizens, marked her leading status in the ultimate pursuit of the liberation of women. In May, 2013, the Principal of Wanning Primary School in Hainan province was found to be sexually abusing many primary school girls. This was known as the “School Motel Room Case”. After the case was revealed, sex worker activist Ye Haiyan was arrested for supporting the rights of the primary school victims. To support Ye, Ai stripped her upper body naked, held a pair of big scissors and wrote on her own body “Looking for a Motel Room? Come to me, release Ye Haiyan!” “The female body has been defined as a symbol of desire. Actively stripping myself naked is an act of resistance,” she explained. Ai’s action led to widespread concern within the nation towards the “School Motel Room Case” and the victims’ defenders.

Around 2005, there were a few young women in China that started to write about sex like male authors, but they used a feminist way to directly record facts about their sex lives and their attitudes towards it. This led to personal attack on the web with merciless whips in the form of comments, and some netizens even posted a “kill bill” to threaten them to keep quiet. Female author Muzi Mei recorded stories about all men who had sex with her, and one of them was a semi-famous married soccer player. Her writing sparked off a fire within the country but almost no one pointed their finger at the married man: it was all Muzi Mei’s fault. Her book “Letters of Remaining Love” was banned with an administrative order, and a rat poison factory even announced that they registered “Muzi Mei” as the name of a kind of rat poison because she was a rat on the street that everyone wanted to smack; she had to be poisoned to prevent society from being harmed.

Some other female authors couldn’t stand the insults from the Chinese public and chose to leave China altogether and live in a faraway country. Hong Kong kung-fu star Jackie Chan, who is also a married man, had an affair in which the women give birth to a baby girl. After the scandal was exposed, not only did he refuse to acknowledge that the baby was his, he even said on TV that he did something wrong that all men do. Chan won the understanding of the Chinese public, but his “concubine” was severely criticized and left Hong Kong to hide in her hometown in Shanghai, afraid of appearing in the public. She raised the child alone.

Chinese women hoped that meetings for the National People’s Congress and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) that both ended in March, 2015, would be a turning point, especially for passing laws to stop domestic violence and sexual harassment, to protect child welfare and legalize homosexuality. Yet human rights defenders were shocked when proposals regarding women’s and children’s rights failed to emerge as almost no representatives in the two meetings sent an official draft for the laws or proposed any discussion, showing a general lack of concern. What was more malicious was that just as the two meeting were in progress, on the night before International Women’s Day, 7 female activists who had been advocating for laws to stop sexual harassment were all arrested by the police in Beijing, severely destroying their plans. After a few days, two activists were released, but the other five were charged for “crime of incitement” and are still detained. In its public announcement, Women’s Rights in China stated: this as a brutal act of random arrest and an abuse of power. It is crude behavior which shows that the Chinese government is openly disregarding human rights and women’s rights, even in the public eye. Up until 12 March, 1521 supporters of women’s rights and gender equality from over 30 countries including China, Japan, Brazil, the U.K., the U.S., Australia, Finland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and India have signed a petition to request release of the five arrested female activists. On 10 March, 2015, dozens of representatives from women’s rights organizations protested against the Chinese government’s cruel acts in front of the United Nations and supported the five feminists.

Feminism and the women’s liberation movement in China are going through a severe winter. However, it is impossible to push women’s status back to decades or even 100 years ago; history is forever weaving its way forward and those that attempt to pull history back must fail!

Picture40

The photo below shows WRIC’s staff and other women’s rights organizations protesting against the CCP’s brutal acts of random arrest and abuse of power!   (Photo credit: North Wind)

An Investigation on China Village’s One Child Policy “Three Examinations”

Women’s Rights in China Founder Jing Zhang testified in Congress US Neb 10, 2009

Picture24

Summary: In rural villages, the Chinese government’s One Child policy is enforced with the ¨Three Examinations,〃 which check women for use of contraceptive rings, pregnancy, and illness practice that is hostile and abhorrent to women.

Picture20
WRIC Founder Jing Zhang (left four)testified in Congress US in Neb 10, 2009.
Picture21
Jing Zhang giving a speech before testifying for the hearing

 

From September 2008 to March 2009, we visited the provinces of Shandong, Guangdong, Guangxi, Sichuan, and He Bei to investigate the conditions of rural villagers with regard to the One Child Policy. During this time, the focal points of our investigations were the so-called ¨Three Examinations,〃 which check women for use of contraceptive rings, pregnancy, and illness four times each year.

 

The Head of the One Child Policy Commission, Zhao Bai Ge, said: ¨There exist 240 million women of childbearing age inChina now, and among them, 83 percent use birth control and contraception.〃 There is some truth in those words. For example, during a trip to a village in Hebei, we found that among the 288 women in that village, 279 women of childbearing age wore the contraception ring (about 92 percent). Only those who have womb defects did not use the intrauterine device.

 

But Zhao Bai Ge, a Cambridge graduate, has also said: ¨Chinaˇs One Child Policy is not as controlling as it seems. The people are voluntarily choosing to enforce the policy.〃 That is a complete lie.

 

Not only do enforcers of the policy disrespect womenthey have no regard for the ethic of preserving personal privacy.
According to a 17-year enforcer of the One Child Policy, as well as several women who have undergone the Three Examinations, the procedure is as follows:
1. The woman is stripped naked for an external physical examination. Her abdomen is pressed to determine if there is any pregnancy, and her breasts are kneaded and squeezed to see if breast milk comes out. Often there are mothers who have no more breast milk.

2. The uterus is checked for the presence of a contraceptive ring.

3. Using a vaginal mirror, the appearance of the vagina is examined. (This part of the procedure is often omitted in poor villages since each vaginal mirror costs 5 RMB). If the vaginal folds appear to be new, this is taken as evidence of either a recent birth or miscarriage. In the case of a miscarriage, proper proof must be provided. If it was a birth, an investigation is launched on the legality of the birth under the terms of the One Child Policy.

 

While interviewing the One Child Policy supervisor in a SiChuan village, we consulted a book titled “One Child Policy Contract and Protocol”. It clearly indicates that if villagers do not make their appointed date for the Three Examinations, they will be fined 10 RMB a day. We have spoken with many mothers; not one of them wants to go to a gynecological clinic four times a year for a uterine checkup.

 

Furthermore, women are forced to carry an introduction letter written by their villageˇs One Child Policy supervisor whenever they travel. Those who travel to foreign lands must first report to a local One Child Policy supervisor for the three examinations, and then mail the results back to their own villages. If the village commission office does not receive the test results, a large fine will be imposed upon the family of the woman.

 

One can imagine the limitations that the quarterly examinations impose on women; their life-giving capacities, travel, and even them most intimate relationship between husband and wife are all controlled by the government. It can be said that until Chinaˇs women reach menopause, they are confined like sows by the fence of forced birth control, controlled and monitored by the government with the sole purpose of not allowing them to have children.

 

Truthfully, mothers are given no respect in China; their wombs are the property of the Communist regime, raised like livestock with their every use subject to approval. Mothers are required to keep a record of their uterine activities, including the date they put their rings in and the type of ring used, when their periods come each month and duration of their period, and the date on which their child was conceived. To the Communist Party, every mother is a suspected criminal and the three examinations are ways to stop the mother from committing the crimeit is a precaution against future motherhood.

 

In a way, enforced wearing of the contraceptive ring is like putting shackles on womenor rather, like putting tracking devices on them so that they may be watched and monitored like animals. Women cannot be touched and their men cannot display any interest. The ring guards the motherˇs uterus, representing the nationˇs power, and, as decided by the law, the ring is the nationˇs defender of that power. It lies deep within the womanˇs vagina, not only killing the husbandˇs sperm but also providing the One Child Policy workers with a key to that ring.

 

If someone dares defy the law and removes the ring, it becomes proof of a crime as severe as murder. The perpetrator will be punished immediately. We interviewed women living on boats on the Guang Dong (Guang Xi River), the majority of whom have removed their rings. They have become escaped criminals ever since, living in constant fear of being caught and punished. Imagine a baby who has to hide inside its motherˇs womb for nine months before it can secretly be born into a society far more dangerous than the womb, then watch its mother face cruel punishment, jail time and heavy fines. And when this child grows up, he or she will have to live under the restrictions of the One Child Policy as well, and will be forced to live a life of fear and unfairness.

 

In November 2008 we took a long-distance bus trip to Bo Bai County in Guang Xi to investigate the One Child Policy. Upon entering the county borders, a large advertisement for the One Child Policy said: ¨The One Child Policy services create families so that every village and every household can blossom!〃 There are even One Child Policy slogans on both sides of traffic signs with blue background and white text. Itˇs like passing through a bizarre One Child Policy road.

 

We visited small towns in the Bo Bi Xian County: Shuang Wang and Sha Po.
To protest the imposition of the three examinations on women in Bo Bai Xian County (in particular the fines and penalties for children that exceed the One Child Policy limit), the people there organized the largest uprising since theTiananmen Square demonstrations. More than 50,000 people from the county surrounded and destroyed six government office buildings in the villages and smashed the concrete roads in order to obstruct police cars. There were at least seven deaths, including two police officers who were beaten to death by the rebellious masses and five student demonstrators who were trampled to death. More than 200 people and 100 students were captured and jailed.

What is more, the incident exposed the corruption of the local government, which had used the policy penalties as their own income. Prior to the rebellion, the countyˇs official Website stated that ¨the entire county has provided more than 5,800 men to the labor force, produced more than 200 cars, tied the tubes for the countyˇs 17,000 women, performed abortions and installed contraceptive rings, and imposed [One Child] policy fines that reach up to 7.88 million RMB.〃

(Note: This content was subsequently deleted from the Website.)

 

In order to investigate the factors leading up to the rebellion, we questioned local barbers, photographers, cab drivers, street peddlers, restaurant workers and hotel personnel, etc., and found that there were a few main points. The factors that these people resented most greatly were the corruption of policy personnel, the fact that the government uses One Child Policy penalties to accumulate wealth, and the unfairness of suddenly enforcing policy rules very strictly after 10 years of leniency.

 

This last point is one that peasants and farmers repeatedly complain about most bitterly. Previously the One Child policy was not enforced very strictly in Bo Bai County; families with two, three and even up to five children were not uncommon. In those days offending parents could pay off policy personnel with a few hundred RMB. Now, those who exceed the policy limit are forced to pay a finebut now that their ¨illegal〃 sons and daughters are already grown up and attending junior high school, the parents refuse to pay more money. To deal with the villagersˇ refusal to pay up, policy enforcers organize third-class county cadres and policemen into a large military unit, marching into towns and letting no family escape from investigations of policy offenses. They imposed 1000 RMB fines on women who do not make their Three Examination appointment and had the courts of law enforce that payment. They also used an extreme course of action, the ¨One Ring, Two Tie〃 procedure, in which they force (by binding) a woman to go to the hospital, where a ring is inserted and, in addition, a tubal ligation is performed (a surgical procedure in which the fallopian tubes are cut, clamped, blocked, or tied to prevent the womanˇs eggs from reaching her uterus; the sperm is also blocked from traveling along the tube to meet the egg).

 

Ever since March 1, 2007, a One Child Policy leadership group established by Bobai Countyˇs policy personnel has raided the houses of extremely poor families and villages, tearing down the meager establishments and destroying possessions. Peasants began to hide in the mountains and along the lake shores. More than 250 mothers were captured and arrested at a reservoir near the town of Jiangning and taken to a hospital. There pregnant women were given an abortion shot, women who were not pregnant yet had a contraceptive ring inserted, and those with two or more children had their fallopian tubes cut off surgically.

 

In the small town of Yingqiao, male villagers and middle school students found this to be the last straw. They rushed into the homes of One Child Policy personnel and smashed their belongings. Afterwards they escaped to the mountains, but were eventually surrounded by more than 300 police officers, and 13 of the villagers were arrested and sent to prison. Especially in the town of Shuangwang near Guangdong, many female villagers who were familiar with the area escaped to Pubei County and Lianjiang City in Guangdong, where they were chased by potential captors sent from Bobai County. The husbands and elderly relatives who were unable to escape with the women were taken hostage by policy personnel, and even larger fines were imposed upon them.

 

The uprising in Bobai County was defeated, and the rebellious villagers were forced to pay a heavy price: Some older mothers agreed to have their tubes tied in order to beg the government to release their sons from imprisonment, and some women were even forced to undergo tubal ligation three times. Many people were stripped of their homes. Policy personnel took away valuables like electric appliances, farming tools, iron framed beds, aluminum window panes, pigs, chickens, cows, and sheep, while goods of little value such as pots, pans and teapots were all smashed. Many villagers took their sons and daughters to spend the nights in the mountain forests, where many became very ill. Countless families were broken up. Like the aftermath of theTiananmen Square incident, rebellion was once again resurrected in the villages.

 

The Chinese government has used inhumane methods to implement its One Child Policy. It defies human rights. It is uncivilized and barbarous. This sort of behavior must be condemned by humanity because every human being is born of a mother. Mothers should not be disgraced and humiliated by any government as they are by the Chinese government.

 

These are the findings of our extensive investigation into the Three Examinations. The department charged with enforcing the One Child Policy is gradually becoming more secretive, especially after the central authorities sent down orders to keep all work confidential. All the people that we interviewed and any exact locations have been concealed for the sake of their safety, which the reader will surely understand.

(Please credit www.wrchina.org)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BBG CEO-Designate Andy Lack Meets CUSIB Supporters of U.S. International Media

                    October 8, 2014

 

Journalist and media executive Andrew Lack, who had been selected by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be the agency’s CEO, met in New York Tuesday with members of the NGO Committee for U.S. International Broadcasting (CUSIB – cusib.org), which advocates for better management and more funding for U.S. international media outreach. The meeting was chaired by CUSIB Executive Director Ann Noonan and included Chinese writer and democracy activist Wei Jingsheng who spent a total of 18 years as a political prisoner in China.

 

Image

 

 

‘

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photo (R-L) Joey Noonan, Jing Zhang, Wei Jingsheng, Ciping Huang, Andy Lack, Ann Noonan, Justin Yu.

 

Andy Lack has been Chairman of the Bloomberg Media Group for the past year. He joined Bloomberg in October 2008 as CEO of its Global Media Group. Prior to joining Bloomberg, Lack was Chairman and CEO of Sony Music Entertainment. A BBG press release noted Lack’s strong journalistic credentials in addition to his accomplishments as a media executive.

“Before joining Sony Music Entertainment, he was president and chief operating officer of NBC, where he oversaw entertainment, news (including MSNBC and CNBC), NBC stations, sales and broadcast and network operations. He was responsible for expanding the Today show to three hours and creating the show’s street-side studio in New York’s Rockefeller Center. From 1993 to 2001, Lack was president of NBC News, which he transformed into America’s most-watched news organization through NBC Nightly News, Meet the Press, Today and Dateline NBC. Before going to NBC, Lack spent much of his television career at CBS News. After joining in 1976, within a year, he became a prominent producer for 60 Minutes and subsequently, senior executive producer of CBS Reports. Lack’s broadcasts at CBS earned numerous honors, including 16 Emmy Awards and 4 Alfred I. DuPont-Columbia University Journalism Awards.”

The New York meeting with Andy Lack was organized by CUSIB Executive Director Ann Noonan. She co-founded the organization in 2011 to successfully oppose the previous BBG Board’s decision to cut all Voice of America radio and satellite television broadcasts to China and later VOA radio broadcasts to Tibet. CUSIB member, Justin Yu, the former President of the New York Chinese Journalists Association and the Chair of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce of New York, hosted the meeting.

Wei Jingsheng and some of the other participants at the New York meeting on Tuesday shared with Andy Lack their experiences of living under authoritarian regimes and their views on the importance of U.S. international media outreach for those who are denied freedom of expression and access to uncensored news. Wei Jingsheng authored the essay, “Fifth Modernization,” which was posted on the “Democracy Wall” in Beijing in 1978. He was deported to the United States in 1997. He was awarded the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Award in 1996, the National Endowment for Democracy Award in 1997, the Olof Palme Memorial Prize in 1994, and the International Activist Award by the Gleitsman Foundation.

Wei Jingsheng spoke about his meeting with John Kerry 20 years ago. He stressed the need for all forms of media in China – including shortwave and medium wave radio. He stressed how poor people and people in the countryside cannot afford cell phones or internet.

Jing Zhang presented Andy with a newly published book, “The Orphans of Shao.” The book was published by Women’s Rights in China.

CUSIB Executive Director Ann Noonan said that her organization is primarily interested in management reforms to improve the work of BBG journalists providing uncensored news to some of the least privileged and the most oppressed individuals, groups and societies. These media programs are a lifeline to people who are still in China and in other countries without free media, Noonan said.

CUSIB members include former political prisoners, such as journalist and human rights activist Jing Zhang, president of Women’s Rights in China, who had suffered five years in prison for her belief in freedom and democracy, and Harry Wu, founder of the Laogai Research Foundation, who had spent 19 years as a political prisoner toiling in the factories, mines, and fields of the Chinese Laogai forced labor camp system. Ann Noonan presented Andy Lack with Harry Wu’s book, “Laogai.” CUSIB also has among its Advisory Board members former BBG Governors, including Victor Ashe who was U.S. Ambassador to Poland and served as mayor of Knoxville, TN. CUSIB members also include current and former leaders of BBG employee unions.

CUSIB Director Ted Lipien, journalist, writer and former Voice of America acting associate director, who participated in the meeting with Andy Lack by phone from California, said that CUSIB sees all three provisions of the VOA Charter as “equally important” and as the best guide for Voice of America’s mission. He explained that the third provision of the VOA Charter does not call for promoting U.S. foreign policy, but it does require VOA to report on U.S. foreign policy and on any significant views in support and in opposition to these policies. He also stressed the importance of cultivating strong support for U.S. international media among members of Congress and constituent groups and organizations advocating for media freedom abroad. Lipien noted that the BBG has primarily a public mission rather than a commercial one.

Ann Noonan talked about the need for better treatment of BBG journalists and the importance of keeping radio for those audiences that have no access to other media platforms, can’t afford them, or can’t use them without the risk of being monitored by repressive governments. She noted the continued plight of Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) journalists whom judges found to have been illegally fired by the management and who have still not been reinstated despite legal orders.

While advocating for management reforms, better treatment of journalists and more resources for those who produce programs, CUSIB does not suggest news coverage or program content decisions, a CUSIB member told BBG Watch, but the organization calls for accuracy and objectivity. Some CUSIB members helped to launch BBG Watch, which serves as a watchdog outlet, but the website is run by volunteers and has no official connection with CUSIB.

CUSIB believes that management reforms would result in better journalism at the BBG and in savings that could pay for more programs and more program delivery platforms, including radio, television, Internet, social media, and mobile phones.

Noonan and Lipien described to Andy Lack the tremendous growth in bureaucratic positions within the International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB) and the Voice of America in the last few several years while numerous programs and journalistic jobs were being cut. They talked about the current disconnect between the central federal bureaucracy in Washington and BBG entities, particularly the surrogate ones, and their audiences. They argued for more independence and more resources for BBG media outlets and their journalists. They also mentioned dismal employee morale among the federal entities of the BBG.

CUSIB members told BBG Watch that it is difficult to ask Congress for more money for the BBG while the agency is badly managed, but they also said that more funding from Congress is needed to make it truly successful under a new and improved management, which they hope Andy Lack will provide.

According to some of the participants in the meeting with Andy Lack, he made an excellent impression, appearing highly engaged, asking numerous questions, and expressing strong support for the mission of U.S. international media.

Andy Lack is not expected to take up his position at the BBG until all the administrative procedures are completed, which may include some of the legislative changes proposed in the bipartisan H.R. 4490 bill still pending in the U.S. Senate. Sources told BBG Watch that it may be several weeks before Andy Lack arrives at the BBG headquarters in Washington, DC to assume his new job as CEO.

 

 

Jing Zhang Comments on China’s “Baby Hatches” Phenomenon

WRIC  Jing Zhang                     Translated by: Cindy Lin                                                                     02-11-2014

 

 

          Women’s Rights in China’s founder Jing Zhang’s interview with Radio Free Asia – Forum on Women and Children which the topic of “baby hatches” phenomenon— below are some of the contents of her interview.                                                                                                      

 

Guangzhou’s first baby hatch, or so-called “abandoned baby island,” has received 51 babies between its launch on January 28 and February 10, according to Southern Metropolis News. This is the number of babies in within first two weeks of the launch. The youngest infant was just two days old and the oldest was 5 days old. Almost all of them had some sort of ailment. In one of the orphanages (Children’s Welfare) of Guangzhou, there are about 1000 beds, but there are more than 2,100 infants. Although the baby hatch has many homes to raise orphans and disabled children, they are under more and more pressure as the number of abandoned children rises.

 

被放在「嬰兒安全島」裏的嬰兒中,大多數都是有嚴重疾病或者有殘疾的孩子。

 

Guangzhou is not the only city that exhibits such cases. In 2013, Wenzhou orphanage received over 100 abandoned babies, almost all suffering from congenital disabilities and illnesses. Slightly older abandoned children are generally physically and intellectual disabled. Almost all newborns who suffer from congenital heart disease, hydrocephalus, cleft lip and palate and other serious illness are abandoned. “Before the parents abandon their children, most have sought medical aid first. Abandonment is a last resort.” Nanjing opened the baby hatch for three months but in six days, they received 159 babies and the baby hatch was closed.

 

Compare those statistics to the abandoned baby orphange in Hamburg, Germany: since its opening in 2000, only 90 babies have been abandoned there.

 

Furthermore, high dosages of drug contraception have led to many issues such as deformities in babies. Many women would also take fertility drugs in order to have multiple births to escape the fines of the one-child policy. There is also a grave issue regarding baby food. Unhealthy baby food and formulas often contain many chemicals, which cause severe medical problems. There are a vast number of reports exposing the fact of “poisonous” baby formula that lead to infant ailments. Legal issues such as welfare and education, social discrimination and parental and ethic/moral issues are other major factors that affect the problem of child abandonment in China. This is not just an issue about ethics; it is one that concerns basic human rights.

 

China has signed the UN Child Welfare Act but has yet to adopt a coherent national stance regarding child rights and welfare. The government’s policies on this issue is highly flawed. There is a lack of official and systematic regulation, integrity, and legitimacy. The Chinese Government’s execution of the inhumane family planning policy has been going on for more than 30 years. The life and death of children still in the womb are completely in the hands of government officials. Forced abortions have become routine and normalized. Children born without official permission have no ID, no right to education, and do not have access to basic social welfare.

 

According to a news report released by the Human Rights watch, many disabled children in China face great obstacles barring access to education. 28% of handicapped children have no access basic education and more than 40% people with disabilities are illiterate. Currently, there are at least 83 million disabled people in China. The Administration is only now in the process of developing regulatory policies for disabled children’s access to education. The Chinese Ministry of Education published a report on this subject. The conclusion? 28% of disabled children are not in school and only received nine years of compulsory education. A researcher at Human Rights Watch said: “ the [Chinese] report did not indicate that the Chinese Ministry of Education, in 2008, had signed the United Nations Convention regarding the rights of persons with disabilities, and  that Chinese policies do not meet the needs of students with disabilities in ordinary schools.”

 

China’s Ministry of education said that there are now 378,800 disabled students in Chinese schools, more than half of them attending ordinary schools which can provide the necessary facilities, including the family counseling. A report of the Ministry of Education also pointed out that there are at least three schools in major cities in the East that have been expressly prohibited from refusing to accept disabled students. However, according to Human Rights Watch, the reality of the situation does not match up with the claims of China’s Ministry of Education. Although the government has formulated policies to ensure disabled children’s right to education, many children have been kept from ordinary schools, or are pressured to drop out. The Human rights Organization wrote: “oftentimes, sufficient training for teachers is the main assistance that children with disabilities need.”

 

In 2011, the United Nations Children’s Fund and the Beijing Normal University, co-authored a report on child welfare policies of China. It was estimated that about 100,000 children are abandoned each year, most of whom are girls or have disabilities. At the same time, the report also showed that since 2005, the number of orphans in China has increased to 570,000 in 2010. There is a 5-year growth rate of about 24%. Chinese Philanthropy Research Institute’s official website also released a report on Chinese children’s welfare policies in 2013. It showed that in early 2013, the number of orphans nationwide rose to 616,000. However, there are numerous “black household” orphans who are not included in the statistics.

 

The Chinese government should find an alternative. The government must serve the interests of its people. First, they should speed up the introduction of legislation that protects the interests of children. Secondly, they must identify the causes of disability and raise awareness about preventative measures. Thirdly, channel all the one-child policy’s fines and fees to invest in economic development and a sound social welfare system. There must be vigorous advocacy to prohibit discrimination against people with disabilities and women, as well as increasing economic assistance to families with disabilities and other disadvantaged groups.

 

棄嬰救助演練

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abandoned babies rescue drill in Yunnan.

 

 

 

 

WRIC Held an Event in NYC “Hold on Liu Xia”

WRIC report / video                                        03-18-2014

 

 

Every March is Women’s History Month in the United States.

During this year’s Women’s History Month, the American NGO organization Women’s Rights in China co-hosted a solidarity event for Liu Xiaobo’s wife, Liu Xia, at the Museum of Tolerance in New York City on March 18 with the Committee for U.S. International Broadcasting, the Visual Artists Guild NYC.

Libby Liu, director of Radio Free Asia, Jing Zhang, founder and director of WRIC, and Ann Noonan, executive director of the CUSIB, attended the meeting and delivered speeches. They collectively appeal to the Chinese government to return Liu Xia to freedom as soon as possible.

Liu Xia, 53, is the wife of Chinese dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo. In 2008, Liu Xiaobo was arrested by the Chinese authorities for drafting “Charter 08”. In December 2009, he was sentenced to 11 years in prison for inciting subversion of state power. After Liu Xiaobo won the award, Liu Xia has been under house arrest by the Chinese government for nearly three years. Jing Zhang said , “Liu Xia has become a symbol of silent resistance to power, and we stand with her.

 

 

 

 

HOLD ON, LIU XIA Event News Release March 18, 2014

HOLD ON, LIU XIA Event

Tuesday, March 18, 2014 from 3:00-5:00pm
Museum of Tolerance located at 226 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017
During Women’s History Month, we celebrate the lives of women who have made outstanding contributions to the global Advancement of Women.  Even more, we are concerned about women who are mentally and physically tortured under authoritarian governments.

Liu Xia, a women of conviction, has been under arbitrary house arrest for three years under orders from China’s government, solely due to the fact that her husband was the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate. Her health is deteriorating day by day as she suffers political persecution and human rights abuses under China’s Regime.

Women’s Rights in China, the Committee for U.S. International Broadcasting, the Visual Artists Guild’s New York Chapter, and civil NGO’s in China and in the United States of America are organizing “Support  Liu Xia” to raise concerns for Liu Xia at a special event at the Museum of Tolerance New York City.  This event will include a video, photography slide show, and poetry readings.

Organizers and participants hope to raise international attention and gain public support for Liu Xia through this open and free discussion, so Liu Xia can break free from China’s brutal regime and be allowed to live with dignity and basic human rights to which all women and all members of the human family are entitled.

 For further information, please contact :
Jing Zhang, Executive Director of Women’s Rights in China
 Email: wrchina2007@gmail.com
Ann Noonan, Executive Director of Committee for US International  Broadcasting,
Email:annnnoonan@hotmail.com
Peggy Chane, President of Visual Artists Guild New York Chapter
 Email: chane@cpcentertainment.com

Please see original post at: https://crchina.live-website.com/index.php/page/4470

Comments on China’s “baby hatches” phenomenon

Women’s Rights in China’s founder Jing Zhang’s interview with Radio Free Asia program on the topic of women and children ” baby hatches ” phenomenon— below are some of the contents of her interview.                    02-11-2014

 

 

 

Guangzhou’s first baby hatch, or so-called “abandoned baby island,” has received 51 babies between its launch on January 28 and February 10, according to Southern Metropolis News. It first opened on the 7th. The youngest infant was just two days old and the oldest was 5 days old. Almost all of them had some sort of ailment. In one of  the orphanages (Children’s Welfare) of Guangzhou, there are about 1000 beds, but there are more than 2,100 infants. Although the baby hatch has a large number of homes to raise orphans and disabled children, they are under more and more pressure as the number of  abandoned children rises.

 

Guangzhou is not the only city that exhibits such cases. In 2013, Wenzhou orphanage received over 100 abandoned babies, almost all suffering from congenital disabilities and illnesses. Slightly older abandoned children are generally physically and intellectual disabled. Almost all newborns who suffer from congenital heart disease, hydrocephalus, cleft lip and palate and other serious illness are abandoned. “Before the parents abandon their children, most have sought medical aid first. Abandonment is a last resort.” In just 6 days, Nanjing abandoned the island three months received 159 abandoned babies.

 

Compare those statistics to the abandoned baby orphange in Hamburg, Germany: since its opening in 2000, only 90 babies have been abandoned there.

 

Furthermore, high dosages of drug contraception have led to many issues such as deformities in babies. Many women would also take fertility drugs in order to have multiple births in order to escape the fines of the one-child policy. There is also a grave issue in regards to baby food. Unhealthy baby food and formulas often contain many chemicals, which cause severe medical problems. There are a vast number of reports exposing the fact of “poisonous” baby formula that lead to infant ailments. Legal issues such as welfare and education, social discrimination and parental and ethic/moral issues are other major factors that affect the problem of child abandonment in China. This is not just an issue about ethics; it is one that concerns basic human rights.

 

China has signed the UN Child Welfare Act but has yet to adopt a coherent national stance in regards to child rights and welfare. The government’s policies on this issue is highly flawed. There is a lack of official and systematic regulation, integrity, and legitimacy. The Chinese Government’s execution of the inhumane family planning policy has been going on for more than 30 years. The life and death of children still in the womb are completely in the hands of government officials. Forced abortions have become routine and normalized. Children born without official permission have no ID, no right to education, and do not have access to basic social welfare.

 

According to a news report released by the Human Rights watch, many disabled children in China face great obstacles barring access to education. 28% of handicapped children have no access basic education and more than 40% people with disabilities are illiterate. Currently, there are at least 83 million disabled people in China. The Administration is only now in the process of developing regulatory policies for disabled children’s access to education. The Chinese Ministry of Education published a report on this subject. The conclusion? 28% of disabled children are not in school and only received nine years of compulsory education. A researcher at Human Rights Watch said: ”the [Chinese] report did not indicate that the Chinese Ministry of Education, in 2008, had signed the United Nations Convention regarding the rights of persons with disabilities, and  that Chinese policies do not meet the needs of students with disabilities in ordinary schools.”

 

China’s Ministry of education said that there are now 378,800 disabled students in Chinese schools, more than half of them attending ordinary schools which can provide the necessary facilities, including the family counseling. A report of the Ministry of Education also pointed out that there are at least three schools in major cities in the East that have been expressly prohibited from refusing to accept disabled students. However, according to Human Rights Watch, the reality of the situation does not match up with the claims of China’s Ministry of Education. Although the government has formulated policies to ensure disabled children’s right to education, many children have been kept from ordinary schools, or are pressured to drop out. The Human rights Organization wrote: “oftentimes, sufficient training for teachers is the main assistance that children with disabilities need.”

 

In 2011, the United Nations Children’s Fund and the Beijing Normal University, co-authored a report on child welfare policies of China. It was estimated that about 100,000 children are abandoned each year, most of whom are girls or have disabilities. At the same time, the report also showed that since 2005, the number of orphans in China has increased to 570,000 in 2010. There is a 5-year growth rate of about 24%. Chinese Philanthropy Research Institute’s official website also released a report on Chinese children’s welfare policies in 2013. It showed that in early 2013, the number of orphans nationwide rose to 616,000. However, there are numerous “black household” orphans who are not included in the statistics.

 

The Chinese government should find an alternative. The government must serve the interests of its people. First, they should speed up the introduction of legislation that protects the interests of children. Secondly, they must identify the causes of disability and raise awareness about preventionary measures. Thirdly, channel all of the one-child policy’s fines and fees to invest in economic development and a sound social welfare system. There must be vigorous advocacy to prohibit discrimination against people with disabilities and women, instead increasing economic assistance to families with disabilities and other disadvantaged groups.

 

Chinese dissident’s, Zhang Lin, daughters escape from China

Translated by: Wendy Mei and Anna Li

WRIC Chen LiQun reports:

Women’s Rights in China(WRIC) in conjunction with Women’s Rights Without Frontiers (WRWF) and the Committee of US International Broadcasting (CUSIB) are three organizations responsible for human intervention and positive planning. Zhang Lin’s two daughters, Zhang An Ni and her sister, Zhang Ru Li, finally escaped out of China. As of yesterday (September 7), they safely landed in California.

This year in March and April, internet users and lawyers from all around the country and a total of couple hundreds people helped voiced solidarity for An Ni. An Ni was forced out of school and detained for 20 hours. Finally, the police forcefully cleared the scene and arrested more than a dozen of activists and put them into detention, dozens of people were also beaten and harassed. A few months later, Zhang was detained again afterward. Meanwhile, 10 years old daughter An Ni suffers the threat of being sent to the orphanage. Since her parents were divorced, she lived with her father who entered jail again, An Ni faced extreme difficulties of living and learning. The Women Right’s organization, whose headquarter is in New York, has been concerned about An Ni’s schooling problem. Founder of WRIC, Zhang Jing, decided to help safeguard the rights of the girls, from mid-June she contacted CUSIB founder ANN Noonan and WRWF founder Reggie Littlejohn, who are also concern about democracy and human right’s issues in China. With all their efforts, An Ni Zhang came to America for education with Reggie Littlejohn as her guardian. Three of them worked separately. First, they got the custody rights from Zhang Lin and his ex-wife, this solved the problem of minor child custody and other legal issue. Secondly, contact all forces, including several members of Congress to help write a letter to relelated departments to petition.School starts in early September, Annie was finally allowed to come to United States accompanied by her sister. Both of them got their visa.

Pictured Yao Cheng (right) with the lawyer accompanying Lily and Annie on August 2013 to visit Zhang Lin in the detention center.

We solved the issued of An Ni’s life, learning and visa, but the major problem is how to prevent the Chinese police and security from blocking An Ni to get out of China. Women’s Rights in China volunteer Yao Cheng, Zhang’s friend, also played a key role. From the sisters’ departure from Anhui to Nanjing and the transfer to Shanghai instead of going straight to United States, on each step of the operation, Sun Lin’s (activist), Hu Jia’s and others’ performance was outstanding; they did their best on their part of the operation. Even if Yao Cheng’s important documents were confiscated by police in a hotel, two sisters’ passports were already been safely transferred.

An Ni’s mother take the role of Yao Cheng later, she obeyed Jing Zhang’s instructions. From filling in the application to going on the plane, a total of three days, the United States Consulate officials personally escort them to enter the consular formalities, then escorted to the airport, until a safe takeoff.

After the rescue of the sisters, An Ni’s enrollment rights issue ended. Yao Chang exchanged his freedom for the freedom of the children’s new life. He paid a heavy price but it is valuable and significant. the entire rescue process shows the glory of humanity, on the other hand, this will become an example of Chinese citizens’ movement. Under fair, reasonable, and legitimate premise, gather forces, sincere cooperation, good practical work, strongly protest, not giving up, trying to help the descendants of human rights and democratic freedoms of people with minimal social costs, maximize social benefits, change the unjust social system.

Jing Zhang who has been working for three months for the freedom of Annie said “A ten year old girl was deprived of the right of education and detained because her father is dissidents was inhuman, one of the most absurd scandal. How can Annie have her “Chinese dream” which is now impressed by this “Chinese nightmare.” She became the youngest Chinese exile who didn’t have the care of her parents who are exiles.”

Jing Zhang said “Reggie Littlejohn and her husband welcome An Ni with open arms and was really enthusiastic. Before they pick up the sisters from the airport, they had prepared very spacious room for each of them and health insurance. After some rest and familiarity of the environment, the sisters went to the restaurant and they helped them buy pajamas, clothes and daily necessities. Due to the language barrier, Reggie Littlejohn called Jing Zhang to help with simple translation. On the phone Reggie Littlejohn said: “ The girls says they are not hungry, you have to tell them they must eat something. I saw that when they were looking at the menu they were staring at the price. Tell them don’t mind the price, hand gesture is fine for communication.”

On the behalf of Women’s rights in China, Zhang Jing thanks all the people in China and America who had help An Ni. An Ni is now safe, we wish her to grow up happily and healthy in this land of freedom, United States. Meanwhile, WRIC will continue to focus on women’s rights. Yao Cheng and Zhang Lin continue to solidarity with the Chinese government.

 

Asia Freedom Radio Reports:

http://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/renquanfazhi/ml-09072013224415.html

Lions Club Organizes Women’s Day Celebration, Jing Zhang Accepts Award

WRIC                                                              03-06-2013

 

On March 16, 2013, Edison, New Jersey’s Visionary Lions Club organized the “2013 International Women’s Day Celebration.” Those in attendance included Edison mayor Antonia Ricigliano, New Jersey senator and Democratic Party candidate for governor Barbara Buono, and eminent female lawyers, while a group of girls put on a dance performance.

 

 

 

New Jersey Senator and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Barbara Buono presented a certificate of award to Zhang Jing, the founder of Women’s Rights in China. (WRIC volunteer photography)

 

The documentary film “It’s a Girl”, a film documenting the misfortunes of baby girls born in India and China, was shown at the gathering. Women’s Rights in China founder Zhang Qing was invited to deliver a keynote speech entitled ” China’s Family Planning Policy Exacerbates the Male-to-Female Ratio Gap” and received a medal and award in recognition of her tireless efforts and contributions toward protecting women’s and children’s rights over the past several years. This was an expression of recognition and encouragement towards Zhang Jing and Women’s Rights in China.

 

 

In 2013, experts estimated that the ratio of women to men in China was between 100:125 and 135. (WRIC volunteer photography)

In her speech,  Jing Zhang mentioned the girls who were abandoned in nunneries in China. (WRIC volunteer photography)

 

In 2011, US nonprofit organization Shadowline Films filmed the documentary film “It’s a Girl” with the assistance of Zhang Jing and Women’s Rights in China volunteers. The film documents the dual oppression and suffering of Chinese women and children under traditional patriarchal culture and coercive family planning policies. The film was released last year in various educational institutes and social strata across the United States and other countries, inciting a great reaction.

 

Jing Zhang stated that in the “It’s a Girl” documentary we see many similarities between the traditional cultures of female infanticide in India and China. We also see that ignorance, backwardness, and cultural dross leads to the arbitrary deprivation of many girls’ birthrights, so that a girl’s life may be threatened or violated at any time. The difference between China and India at this stage is that the One Child Policy implemented by the Chinese government more greatly intensifies the harm done to women and exacerbates the great disparity in the male-to-female ratio. China scholars assert that the data for the male-female birth ratio is 119:100, while the data from field surveys done by Women’s Rights in China in a number of rural areas is 125~135:100. That is to say, in the next 20 years, at least 40 million Chinese men will be unable to find a wife and must remain bachelors. This issue will severely affect the stability of social and family structures and will simultaneously effect the economies and security of neighboring countries. Forty million single bachelors could even directly threaten world peace.

 

WRIC’s board member Ann Noonan and Zhang Jing were at the meeting. (Photography by WRIC volunteer)

 

From left: Lions Club District Director John Kobland, DG, Zhang Jing, Edison Mayor Antonia Ricigliano and Chinese women’s rights volunteer Zhang Yujun. (Photo by WRIC Xu Yan)

 

 

In 2015, Jing Zhang received a certificate of commendation from members of Congress in recognition of her years of advocacy for women and children.

 

Jing Zhang introduced the causes behind the sharp decrease in the number of Chinese girls in rural areas, including the trade and drowning of female babies during the 80’s and 90’s and the currently popular fetal gender identification via B-mode ultrasound, which have in turn led to a large-scale gender imbalance.

 

Jing Zhang proposed that due to China’s strict One Child Policy and the increase in demand for the child trade market, child trafficking has become a human trafficker’s easiest route to making money. Add to this the allure of high prices paid by adoptive families from Europe and the United States (generally, the full adoption process costs between 30,000-50,000 USD), and the child trade becomes all the more common and all the more severe. In 2011, the exposure of “the Shao clan orphans” case received the broad attention of Chinese and international media. Because they did not have did not have a birth license and were born as “illegal” children, the children of namely rural families were sent to the Shaoyang City Social Welfare Institute (an orphanage) in Hunan province in exchange for a fine. The vast majority of these children were female and sold at high prices to international adoptive families through the orphanage. We know at least seven “Shao clan orphans” with natural [living] parents have since been adopted by American families.

 

While showing the documentary “It’s a Girl”, the tragic story of these women moved many to tears and the sound of sobbing filled the audience.

 

Other outstanding women were honored that day. (WRIC volunteer photography)

The girls’ singing and dancing express a strong sense of feminism. (WRIC volunteer photography)

 

 

The girls’ singing and dancing express a strong sense of feminism. (WRIC volunteer photography)

 

 

China threatens families who resist its one-child policy

By WRIC’s Jing Zhang                                                    May 2, 2012

(Forwarded from National Review)

 

China’s War on Baby Girls

 

The blind Chinese human-rights activist Chen Guangcheng, who escaped from house arrest on April 22, who may be under the protection of the U.S. Embassy, was initially detained for exposing the massive abuse of Chinese women under China’s one-child policy. His documentation of forced sterilizations and abortions landed him in jail for four years, followed by a year and a half of house arrest. His daring escape has now triggered renewed attacks on organizations engaged in helping Chinese women to keep and feed their infants.

 

Since April 28, the Family Planning Commission of Susong County in China’s Anhui province has been harassing families of pregnant women and infants who have received aid from a charities that help rural families raise infant girls. Often the girl is a second child, which is in violation of China’s one-child policy.

 

???????????????????????????????

 

 China ultrasonic identification of fetal is common. The picture shows WRIC volunteer Su, changlan visited the unlicensed clinic of identification of fetal in Xi’an.     (photos by WRIC)

 

举报热线_副本 IMG_5718_副本_副本

WRIC volunteers rescued from forced abortion out of the little girl Lele 2013, in Anhui.  (photos by WRIC)

 

PRC government agents have issued heavy fines to families for over-quota births and have threatened forced abortion for mothers with “illegal” pregnancies. Li Bin, the former chairman of the National Population and Family Planning Commission, is the current governor of Anhui province.

 

The offending charity is the Rural Chinese Infant Assistance Program, which has grown in response to the severe gender imbalance among newborns. Allowed only one child, many parents abort their female children or stop trying to conceive after the birth of a boy. The Infant Assistance Program aims to elevate the cultural value of infant girls through direct aid, without any conditions, to their families. Several hundred families have benefited in Susong County alone. Rural families have welcomed the program enthusiastically.

 

Since Chen Guangcheng’s escape, the high-profile persecution initiated by the Susong Family Planning Commission has created panic among benefiting families and their communities. Many lives are directly threatened. Government agents have announced that any family with an “illegal” birth will face a fine of 50,000 yuan  ($7,700, about ten times China’s annual per capita income). Any woman found to be pregnant “illegally” — without a birth permit — will face a forced abortion.

 

Family Planning agents have also threatened to take action against volunteers and employees of the Infant Assistance Program if they do not cooperate with the authorities by turning over all material related to the program.

 

In the 30 years of the brutal one-child policy, hundreds of millions of infants have been killed. This has led to serious social problems that are now obvious — not only the gender imbalance, but also the aging of the general population. Regardless, the PRC government forges ahead with its notoriously inhumane policy.

 

The Susong Family Planning Commission’s persecution of the Infant

Assistance Program should outrage observers in China and abroad.

 

The organization I head, Women’s Rights in China, demands that the Susong Family Planning Commission immediately stop all harassment of the Infant Assistance Program; cease threats and fines against volunteers and families who are beneficiaries; and treat “Harmonious Society and People First” as a principle and not just a Party slogan. We call on Family Planning agents to listen to their own consciences and to heed the outcry from the Chinese and international public.

 

As long as the Susong Family Planning Commission continues to persecute the Infant Assistance Program’s volunteers, pregnant women, and the families of baby girls, Women’s Rights in China will raise its voice to condemn it in the media and to take legal action against all responsible officials.

 

 

Jing’s Speech: CCP Crackdown on Jasmine Revolution Extends to Women and Children’s Organizations

 

WRIC Jing Zhang testified in Congress US                  May 13, 2011

 

 

 

WRIC Founder Jing Zhang (from right 4 ) testified in Congress US. From right 3: Harry Wu, Wei Jingsheng, Huang Ciping. (photo by WRIC)

 

In February of this year, inspired by the wave of democratic movements in the Arab World, the Chinese-language internet community gave birth to messages of the Jasmine Revolution. The Chinese Communist Government reacted in panic and severe crackdown, in blatant violation of the Chinese Constitution and the UN Charter. It dismissed international condemnation, arrested hundreds of dissidents, civil rights attorneys, artists including Jiang Tianyong and Ai Weiwei, even members of the public in the streets who happened to carry jasmine flowers. In Guizhou province, since March 18th, more than a dozen dissidents were arrested for more than a month without reason. One of them, Ms. Wu Yuqin had cancer. Her eighty-year-old mother was also arrested for defending her daughter. Two other women, Wang Lihong and Liang Haiyi, were also arrested and charged for expressing opinions related to the Jasmine Revolution. The Chinese government has also put non-governmental organizations and their workers under surveillance. The work of All Girls Allowed had suffered drastic impacts because of threats and harassment of the police and National Security Bureau.

 

WRIC Volunteers under Surveillance

 

Women’s Rights in China is a non-profit organization registered in the United States. WRIC operates many projects benefiting girl babies and orphans in a number of provinces in Mainland China. One of these, the Baby Shower Gift Program was a charitable project whose aim was the aid of rural Chinese mothers and baby girls. Every month we distribute funds to help families of baby girls buy milk and supplement the nutrition of pregnant women. The purpose of this aid was to encourage women who gave birth to girls, to combat traditional discrimination against women and to erase gender imbalance. More than 500 babies and orphans have benefited in this program. However, since March of this year, our workers and volunteers have been harassed by local police and security agents. They had been detained and interrogated multiple times and forced to divulge every detail of this program. Officials of local towns and villages disseminated rumors that workers were trouble makers who would be arrested by the police, which troubled and frustrated mothers who received aid.

 

Police in one province (to protect the personal safety of our workers, we elect not to identify the specific location.) not only conducted forced interrogations, but also sent two agents to record the aid distribution locations by video. They followed our workers on their visits to families in remote villages, “witnessing” the conversations between our workers and families receiving aid. When our workers and local families were talking at the doorstep, they would stand close by. When our workers entered local houses, they would enter and sit down as well. One may well imagine our workers and the rural families’ feelings. Some families requested to stop receiving aid in order to escape police attention. They feared that the attention would have long-lasting ill effects for the whole family. Many volunteers also backed out of this charitable project. They entered our work to do good for the local community but found themselves treated as felons under open police surveillance. Neighbors of our workers also became suspicious and opposed their work.

 

A police agent (black leather jacket) taping mothers receiving aid from WRIC the Rural baby Assistance Program. From Right was WRIC’s volunteer Li, Yuanlong. ((photo by WRIC))

 

A farmer whose family receive our aid was forcibly pushed into a police vehicle for interrogation. His cell phone was confiscated. The police threatened him, asking whether the aid carried any conditions, what the volunteers said to him, whether there was any encouragement to join Falun Gong. He was not released until an interrogation lasting hours after he was no longer deemed a “suspect”.

 

In another location of WRIC’s program, as a result of police harassment, field workers and some aid-receiving families requested an early end to the Baby Shower Gift. Hundreds of baby girls and their families would lose the 100 yuan per month assistance for milk, which carried no conditions. To a family whose monthly income was only between 300 to 500 yuan, this would represent a grave loss.

 

A field worker told me, “It’s hopeless. If we continue the program, we might get into prison. If the government wants to arrest someone, there’s no shortage of made-up charges. In China, it’s not easy to do good even if you want to. The government wants to watch everything. It doesn’t want to overlook any detail, even your though. They have all the money and all the manpower. That’s what it means to have a strong and glorious country.”

 

 

Arrests in Tiananmen Doesn’t Spare Pregnant Woman

 

The openings of the People’s Congress and the Political Consultation Congress in March coincided with the Jasmine Revolution. The government’s surveillance and oppression became even more rampant. Police arrested all “questionable personalities” found in sensitive locations Tiananmen Square and McDonald’s Restaurants and kept in detention centers such as Jiu Jin Zhuang( Short-term imprisonment center ) in Beijing. Ms. Nie Nina, a woman from Henan province, got in touch with us through difficulties. She has now been pregnant for five months. Her family house was forcibly demolished, she could find no redress from the local government. She was forced to petition the central government in Beijing and was beaten many times as a result. She had been put into administrative detention in Beijing’s Jiu Jin Zhuang center. On March 28th, Ms. Nie was transferred from Jiu Jin Zhuang to her local detention center for ten days. During this time, she suffered beatings, including to her head, from the hands of government agents.

 

On April 19th, Ms. Nie was again arrested and kept in Xiangcheng, Henan detention center. Seven to eight male government agents undressed her in the court yard of the detention center in front of 60 onlookers, leaving only the bra on her upper body. Afterwards, she was dragged to ultrasound exams and threatened with forced abortion. She was extremely frightened and greatly humiliated. In the end, because her pregnancy was deemed “legal”, she was spared an abortion after her family frantically called for help. During her three day detention, she was given no food or water by the authorities. One day her was suffering severe stomach pain from hunger, a woman working in the kitchen sneaked some bread to her. Government agents told her, “We’ll kill you if you go to Beijing to petition again. Police in Beijing told us to arrest you.”

 

 

Nie Lina, a pregnant woman from Xiangcheng, Henan, was arrested while petitioning in Beijing during the two sessions in March 2011 and was detained for 15 days. (Photo by WRIC)
​

 

 

I asked if she had visited sensitive locations with connection with the Jasmine Movement. She answered that she had no idea about any “jasmine”. Her only purpose was to uphold her rights by petitioning in Beijing.

 

Similarly, a victim of the Birth Planning Policy was detained in Jiu Jin Zhuang in March. A farmer’s wife from Nanping, Fujian province was forced to undergo tubal ligation, a sterilization operation several years ago. The doctor mistakenly severed the ureter tract of a kidney, leading to infections in her kidney system. Even when Beijing hospitals proved that the ureter tracked was medically severed, local government and hospital refused to compensate her, forcing her to petition the central government.

 

According to her, after multiple arrests, beatings and detainment, she was used as an example of “illegal petitioner in arrest” in the local television station’s program, which led to the destruction of her reputation and collateral punishment to her children and family. When she was taken into hospital in March for forced “treatment”, she lost all freedom. She was followed by agents even when she went home to pick up clothing. Local law enforcement agents threatened that if she petitioned the government again, her death would be in “murky” circumstances. She only recently knew that the nervous atmosphere was the result of something called “jasmine”. She said that one kidney was completely destroyed, her head was also beaten. She estimated that she would not have long to live and had no desire to persist in living. Hearing these words, the only things we could offer were comforting words and prayer.

 

 

Cutting Off Foreign Funding, Scholarships Stopped

 

The Orphan Scholarship Program is one of WRIC’s projects. As a result of the One Child Policy and bias against girls, many new born girls were abandoned by parents quickly after birth. Buddhist nuns in Tongcheng, Anhui province adopted many abandoned baby girls. WRIC provided scholarships and aid to more than twenty of these orphans according to their ages. Since the beginning of this year, the guardians of these orphans, the nuns suddenly became unenthusiastic about such assistance. They almost completely stopped accepting aid in February and March. After a special investigation, we discovered that the nun in charge of accepting the funding, a member of the Tongcheng Buddhist Association, received pressure from “talks” with local authorities. She was no longer willing to have any connection with economic aid from abroad, even charitable foreign Christian donations.

 

The central government announced its orphan assistance program many months ago. The funding was supposed to be retrospective to January of 2010. In our March, 2011 investigation, we discovered that even provincial-level welfare agencies had not seen the funding, let alone city-, county-, and township-level agencies. In the Tongcheng nunneries, not one has heard of such assistance.

 

We do not know whether the Orphan Scholarship Program had any connections with the government crackdown over the Internet Jasmine Revolution or the content of the conversations between Tongcheng police and the nuns, but the sudden change in the nuns’ attitude towards scholarship donations speaks to the pressure they were under. It also speaks to the Chinese government, especially local government’s suspicion of foreign charities and donations. This suspicion totally dismisses the needs of the most vulnerable group, the interests of the abandoned orphans. In other words, the Communist government, in order to maintain stability for its rule, not only controls dissidents, civil rights advocates and internet opinion, but also keeps surveillance over activities of foreign non-governmental organizations. As these organizations’ work mainly benefit women, children and disease patients, such controls led to direct suffering of these vulnerable communities.