Su Changlan: Introduction and Thanks

Women’s Rights in China(WRIC) volunteer, Sandra Lam who represents Su Changlan, thanks Visual Artists Guild for giving an award to Su.

“Honorable ladies and gentlemen,

My name is Sandra Lam, and I have been a volunteer with WRIC since it was founded in New York. Today I am here on behalf of WRIC’s most outstanding mainland China volunteer, Ms. Su Changlan, to accept the VAG’s award for courage. A few days ago, when we told Su Changlan’s husband that the VAG would be honoring Su Changlan with an award, he was moved, encouraged, and most of all proud that so many people cared about his wife. He asked us to express the deepest gratitude on behalf of himself, Su Changlan, and all friends concerned for Su Changlan.

Miss Su Changlan is an experienced volunteer of WRIC. All these years, she has been fighting for justice for civilians and vulnerable groups at the grassroots level, and protesting for human rights defenders and prisoners of conscience tortured in prison. The cases of human rights violations she participated in include the illegal grants of land use in Sanshan Island, Nanhai; The incident of the three netizens in Fujian; activities concerning missing children in many provinces; reporting and protesting against forced abortions cases; and helping trafficked child brides in Putian, Fujian search for their birth parents and introducing their painful stories to German and Swiss media to raise international awareness. Although Su was interrogated and harassed by the police many times, and even had a CCTV installed by the police near the door of her house, she was never fearful and demonstrated great courage. She is a well-respected human rights defender. After the peaceful protests in Hong Kong to Occupy Central began, the Chinese media under control of the government twisted the truth and blackened the names of Hong Kong students and civilians who organized peaceful activities for Occupy Central in demand of universal suffrage.  Su, like more than 100 netizens in mainland China, reposted truthful news about Hong Kong’s Umbrella Revolution through channels like “breaking down government firewalls” to enable the public in mainland China to understand the facts behind the Occupy Central protests.

On October 27, 2014, Su Changlan was taken into custody at a detention center in Foshan City’s Nanhai District. It was not until 192 days later that she received permission to see a lawyer for the first time. On May 5 at the Foshan City, Nanhai District detention center, the Guangzhou lawyer Wu Kuiming finally met with Su Changlan, who was suspected of incitement to subvert state power. Prior to this, Su Changlan’s older brother, Su Shangwei, and her husband, Chen Dequan, had gone to the Foshan City public security bureau to request to meet with Su Changlan, but their requests were denied.

On February 2, after Su Shangwei stood beside the entrance to the Foshan City public security bureau holding a poster that read “Conscience is nonviolent! Su Changlan is innocent,” he was taken to the Foshan City Chancheng Sub-bureau. In the early hours of February 14, he was detained on suspicion of disorderly behavior. At the same time, Chen Dequan was also taken away by the Chancheng police. Three people from one family were all in custody, leaving only a minor-aged son at home to suffer this fright. Over a month later, Su’s older brother and husband were only released from custody because of illness. To this day they are still awaiting trial, and even when friends send living expenses for the Sus’ child via Western Union, they have no way to withdraw the funds.

From when Hong Kong’s “Occupy Central” began on September 28, 2014 until December, between 96 and 320 people were arrested in the mainland for supporting the Hong Kong people’s demands for a general election in the “Umbrella Movement.” This number does not include the rumored arrest of Liu Meng and his models for organizing a “Yellow Umbrella” fashion show, nor does it factor in the many people who were “invited to tea” (interrogated by state security forces) or “sent on vacation” (temporarily forced to leave home). The youngest was an 8 year-old girl named Xu Yanzhi. Her father Xu Nailai was imprisoned for publishing remarks online supporting Hong Kongers. After he was injured from a police beating, the police delivered his 8 year-old daughter to a “children’s shelter,” where she was locked up for over 70 days. Her friends and relatives were not allowed to take her home to care for her, nor even visit her. In the end it was discovered that the 8 year-old girl’s body had scars in many places. I now convey single father Xu Nailai’s extremely desperate request. Because he participated in a human rights activity, he and his child have been harassed by the police for a long period. He hopes that a good-hearted person will adopt the 8 year-old Xu Yanzhi so her body and mind can avoid further torture. From this we can see that the state of China’s human rights has once again fallen into a bitter winter. The Xi Jinping government’s silencing of the news and freedom of speech is something rarely seen in recent decades.

WRIC calls on the international community, the media, and members of congress to not only support the protests of Hong Kong students and civilians, but also to be concerned about Su Changlan and other human rights defenders detained for caring about Occupy Central protests in Hong Kong. Your voices can reach China and urge the government to instantly cease all mafia-like methods of attacking political dissidents (such as abduction and disappearance) and immediately release all human rights defenders and prisoners of conscience, so people like Su Changlan can regain freedom and reunite with their families as soon as possible.

Thank you very much  for your support!”

IMG_20150602_114233~2

images03

 

 

 

WRIC in Hearing: Chinese Government Crackdown on Jasmine Revolution Extends to Women and Children’s Organizations

Source: WRIC                                                      May 12, 2012

 

WRIC Founder Jing Zhang (from right to fourth) was testifying in Congress.

Picture15

 

In February of this year, inspired by the wave of democratic mo vements in the Arab World, the Chinese-language internet community gave birth to messages of the Jasmine Revolution. The Chinese Communist Government reacted in panic and severe crackdown, in blatant violation of the Chinese Constitution and the UN Charter. It dismissed international condemnation, arrested hundreds of dissidents, civil rights attorneys, artists including Jiang Tianyong and Ai Weiwei, even members of the public in the streets who happened to carry jasmine flowers. In Guizhou province, since March 18th, more than a dozen dissidents were arrested for more than a month without reason. One of them, Ms. Wu Yuqin had cancer. Her eighty-year-old mother was also arrested for defending her daughter. Two other women, Wang Lihong and Liang Haiyi, were also arrested and charged for expressing opinions related to the Jasmine Revolution. The Chinese government has also put non-governmental organizations and their workers under surveillance. The work of All Girls Allowed had suffered drastic impacts because of threats and harassment of the police and National Security Bureau.

 

WRIC Volunteers under Surveillance

Women’s Rights in China is a non-profit organization registered in the United States. WRIC operates many projects benefiting girl babies and orphans in a number of provinces in Mainland China. One of these, the Rural Girls Assistance Program was a charitable project whose aim was the aid of rural Chinese mothers and baby girls. Every month we distribute funds to help families of baby girls buy milk and supplement the nutrition of pregnant women. The purpose of this aid was to encourage women who gave birth to girls, to combat traditional discrimination against women and to erase gender imbalance. More than 500 babies and orphans have benefited in this program. However, since March of this year, our workers and volunteers have been harassed by local police and security agents. They had been detained and interrogated multiple times and forced to divulge every detail of this program. Officials of local towns and villages disseminated rumors that workers were trouble makers who would be arrested by the police, which troubled and frustrated mothers who received aid.

 

Police in one province (to protect the personal safety of our workers, we elect not to identify the specific location.) not only conducted forced interrogations, but also sent two agents to record the aid distribution locations by video. They followed our workers on their visits to families in remote villages, “witnessing” the conversations between our workers and families receiving aid. When our workers and local families were talking at the doorstep, they would stand close by. When our workers entered local houses, they would enter and sit down as well. One may well imagine our workers and the rural families’ feelings. Some families requested to stop receiving aid in order to escape police attention. They feared that the attention would have long-lasting ill effects for the whole family. Many volunteers also backed out of this charitable project. They entered our work to do good for the local community but found themselves treated as felons under open police surveillance. Neighbors of our workers also became suspicious and opposed their work.

 

Picture16Mothers came to receive aid from WRIC via Rural Girls Assistance Program, (Picture Provided by WRIC)

Picture17

A police agent (black leather jacket) videotaping mothers receiving aid from Rural Girls Assistance Program, (Picture Provided by WRIC)

 

A farmer whose family receive our aid was forcibly pushed into a police vehicle for interrogation. His cell phone was confiscated. The police threatened him, asking whether the aid carried any conditions, what the volunteers said to him, whether there was any encouragement to join Falun Gong. He was not released until an interrogation lasting hours after he was no longer deemed a “suspect”.

 

In another location of WRIC’s program, as a result of police harassment, field workers and some aid-receiving families requested an early end to the Rural Girls Assistance Program. Hundreds of baby girls and their families would lose the 100 yuan per month assistance for milk, which carried no conditions. To a family whose monthly income was only between 300 to 500 yuan, this would represent a grave loss.

 

A field worker told me, “It’s hopeless. If we continue the program, we might get into prison. If the government wants to arrest someone, there’s no shortage of made-up charges. In China, it’s not easy to do good even if you want to. The government wants to watch everything. It doesn’t want to overlook any detail, even your though. They have all the money and all the manpower. That’s what it means to have a strong and glorious country.”
Arrests in Tiananmen Doesn’t Spare Pregnant Woman

The openings of the People’s Congress and the Political Consultation Congress in March coincided with the Jasmine Revolution. The government’s surveillance and oppression became even more rampant. Police arrested all “questionable personalities” found in sensitive locations Tiananmen Square and McDonald’s Restaurants and kept in detention centers such as Jiu Jin Zhuang( Short-term imprisonment center ) in Beijing. Ms. Nie Nina, a woman from Henan province, got in touch with us through difficulties. She has now been pregnant for five months. Her family house was forcibly demolished, she could find no redress from the local government. She was forced to petition the central government in Beijing and was beaten many times as a result. She had been put into administrative detention in Beijing’s Jiu Jin Zhuang center. On March 28th, Ms. Nie was transferred from Jiu Jin Zhuang to her local detention center for ten days. During this time, she suffered beatings, including to her head, from the hands of government agents.

 

On April 19th, Ms. Nie was again arrested and kept in Xiangcheng, Henan detention center. Seven to eight male government agents undressed her in the court yard of the detention center in front of 60 onlookers, leaving only the bra on her upper body. Afterwards, she was dragged to ultrasound exams and threatened with forced abortion. She was extremely frightened and greatly humiliated. In the end, because her pregnancy was deemed “legal”, she was spared an abortion after her family frantically called for help. During her three day detention, she was given no food or water by the authorities. One day she was suffering severe stomach pain from hunger, a woman working in the kitchen sneaked some bread to her. Government agents told her, “We’ll kill you if you go to Beijing to petition again. Police in Beijing told us to arrest you.”
Picture18

Picture19
March 15, 2011 Ms. Nie is forcibly arrested by police and government officials.(Pictures provided by WRIC)

     I asked if she had visited sensitive locations with connection with the Jasmine Movement. She answered that she had no idea about any “jasmine”. Her only purpose was to uphold her rights by petitioning in Beijing.

 

Similarly, a victim of the Birth Planning Policy was detained in Jiu Jin Zhuang in March. A farmer’s wife from Nanping, Fujian province was forced to undergo tubal ligation, a sterilization operation several years ago. The doctor mistakenly severed the ureter tract of a kidney, leading to infections in her kidney system. Even when Beijing hospitals proved that the ureter tracked was medically severed, local government and hospital refused to compensate her, forcing her to petition the central government.

 

According to her, after multiple arrests, beatings and detainment, she was used as an example of “illegal petitioner in arrest” in the local television station’s program, which led to the destruction of her reputation and collateral punishment to her children and family. When she was taken into hospital in March for forced “treatment”, she lost all freedom. She was followed by agents even when she went home to pick up clothing. Local law enforcement agents threatened that if she petitioned the government again, her death would be in “murky” circumstances. She only recently knew that the nervous atmosphere was the result of something called “jasmine”. She said that one kidney was completely destroyed, her head was also beaten. She estimated that she would not have long to live and had no desire to persist in living. Hearing these words, the only things we could offer were comforting words and prayer.

 

Cutting Off Foreign Funding, Scholarships Stopped

 

The Orphan Scholarship Program is one of WRIC’s projects. As a result of the One Child Policy and bias against girls, many new born girls were abandoned by parents quickly after birth. Buddhist nuns in Tongcheng, Anhui province adopted many abandoned baby girls. WRIC provided scholarships and aid to more than twenty of these orphans according to their ages. Since the beginning of this year, the guardians of these orphans, the nuns suddenly became unenthusiastic about such assistance. They almost completely stopped accepting aid in February and March. After a special investigation, we discovered that the nun in charge of accepting the funding, a member of the Tongcheng Buddhist Association, received pressure from “talks” with local authorities. She was no longer willing to have any connection with economic aid from abroad, even charitable foreign Christian donations.

 

The central government announced its orphan assistance program many months ago. The funding was supposed to be retrospective to January of 2010. In our March, 2011 investigation, we discovered that even provincial-level welfare agencies had not seen the funding, let alone city-, county-, and township-level agencies. In the Tongcheng nunneries, not one has heard of such assistance.

 

We do not know whether the Orphan Scholarship Program had any connections with the government crackdown over the Internet Jasmine Revolution or the content of the conversations between Tongcheng police and the nuns, but the sudden change in the nuns’ attitude towards scholarship donations speaks to the pressure they were under. It also speaks to the Chinese government, especially local government’s suspicion of foreign charities and donations. This suspicion totally dismisses the needs of the most vulnerable group, the interests of the abandoned orphans. In other words, the Communist government, in order to maintain stability for its rule, not only controls dissidents, civil rights advocates and internet opinion, but also keeps surveillance over activities of foreign non-governmental organizations. As these organizations’ work mainly benefit women, children and disease patients, such controls led to direct suffering of these vulnerable communities.

 

 

 

 

 

‘Harper, Help Free My Dad,’ Pleads McGill Law Student

‘Harper, Help Free My Dad,’ Pleads McGill Law Student
By Matthew Little, Epoch Times | November 5, 2014
Last Updated: November 5, 2014 10:24 pm

Picture22

(L-R) Conservative MP Scott Reid, Wang Bingwu, Ti-Anna Wang, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, former MP David Kilgour, and NDP MP Wayne Marston called for democracy activist Dr. Wang Bingzhang to be released from prison in China during a press conference on Parliament Hill on Nov 5, 2014. (Matthew Little/Epoch Times)

Picture23
Ti-Anna Wang called on Prime Minister Stephen Harper during a Parliament Hill press conference on Nov. 5, 2014, to ask the Chinese leadership to release her father, Wang Bingzhang, a democracy activist who studied at McGill University and has been held in solitary confinement in China for 12 years. Behind her is Green Party leader Elizabeth May. (Matthew Little/Epoch Times)
OTTAWA—Ti-Anna Wang didn’t really understand her father. His endless efforts to push China toward democracy sent him around the world, and his political activism put him at odds with the family.
She was 13 when her father, Dr. Wang Bingzhang, was abducted from Vietnam in 2002 and handed over to Chinese police to be tried in China. Since then he has been serving a life sentence in solitary confinement.
Dr. Wang is a hero to many, a man who walked away from a lucrative medical career in hopes of changing his country for the better. He founded the overseas Chinese democracy movement, and travelled the world in that pursuit.
His Canadian ties are solid. Wang got his PhD at McGill University, where his daughter is now in her first year of law school, a career choice inspired by her father. Wang left behind a family here, including Ti-Anna and her two brothers.
She didn’t understand him so well when she was young, she said. His activism took him away from her. Now, 12 years later, she knows better who her father is.
“He is very much more present in my life now,” she said, speaking of her feelings and thoughts about her father.
Ti-Anna isn’t alone in her effort to free her dad. Her uncle, Wang Bingwu, has been appealing on Parliament Hill for a week, and last year spent days on end in front of the Chinese Embassy in Ottawa calling for his brother’s release.
“It is unbelievable torture to my brother in solitary confinement for the last 12 years. My brother suffered three strokes. The first one was almost fatal … I don’t want to see him die in jail,” Wang Bingwu said.
Trumped Up Charges
On Wednesday Nov. 5, Ti-Anna was joined on Parliament Hill by MPs from every federal party in calling for Dr. Wang’s release.
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said Wang’s imprisonment is an affront to international treaties both Canada and China have signed affirming basic rights.
“He was tried in secret … not permitted to speak, not permitted to rebut any of the charges against him, all of which were trumped up and fraudulent,” said Cotler during a press conference.
NDP MP Wayne Marston said there has been change at the top of the Chinese regime and with current leader Xi Jinping now taking the helm, it’s a good time for Prime Minister Stephen Harper to press for Wang’s release on his upcoming trip to China.
“There is possibly an opportunity here for some change. And it is my view and the view of the NDP that that is the time for our prime minister to bring to the fore the human rights issues.”
“It is critical and crucial that Canada resumes its leadership role in the field of international human rights,” said Marston.
Wang’s case has been carried by many MPs over the years, including former MP and Secretary of State David Kilgour, one of Canada’s foremost experts on China, according to Cotler.
Kilgour said Xi has promised profound change in China, and now is the time to prove it.
“Releasing Dr. Wang would show both the Chinese people and the world that Xi intends to stand by what he says,” Kilgour said.
Conservative MP Scott Reid also lent his support, as did Green Party leader Elizabeth May who said Canada must insist Dr. Wang be freed and returned to Canada.
Committed to the Cause
Ti-Anna has always been careful not to criticize the Chinese regime, hoping that small deference would help ease her father’s release. To date, it doesn’t seem to have helped, perhaps because of the stature of her father’s work.
“He is the founder of the overseas Chinese democracy movement and dedicated his life to promoting rule of law, freedom, and human rights in China,” she said.
He was sentenced for espionage and terrorism, falsified charges used to justify his punishment.
“In a country without meaningful rule of law, my family has no means to legally appeal my father’s conviction despite having secured exonerating evidence for the graver charges against him,” said Ti-Anna.
Her advocacy on his behalf has led the Chinese regime to refuse her a visa to go there. She hasn’t seen her father in five years. That hasn’t weakened her resolve, she said.
“Even though it’s been so long that the case has dragged on, in a sense I feel more committed now because I have a better understanding of what is going on,” she said.
But the time and effort takes a toll, she added. “There’s just this fatigue in a sense, emotionally and physically and even financially. But on the other hand I also feel very committed to the cause as a whole.”
She wants the Canadian government to intervene more assertively on her father’s behalf and for Harper to use all diplomatic opportunities to secure the release of her father.
High-level diplomacy is her greatest hope for freeing her father she said, and she wanted all MPs to call on Harper to that end.
“It was the very values espoused by Canada and other democracies that inspired my father. If we cannot turn to this government and its leaders to advocate for his release, to whom can we turn?”

HKJA: Hong Kong’s Freedom of the Press Situation is “The Darkest Decades”

Source: WRIC   Translated by Anna Li and Wendy Mei 

June 7, 2014

 

Hong Kong Journalist Association said journalists generally believe there is a limited freedom of the press.

Hong Kong Reporter Association’s “2014 Annual Report of Freedom of Expression” said, in the past year, there was a significant deterioration in Hong Kong’s freedom of the press, and has been caught in the “darkest decades”.

Hong Kong Journalist Association on Sunday (July 6) published a report that pointed out in “Ming Pao” former editor Liu was attacked, Li Huiling was dismissed from business, commercial, radio, and talk shows, and “Apple Daily” and “am730” was deprived of advertising events, which shows that Hong Kong media was “suffering pressure from all sides”.

Hong Kong Journalist Association believes that with the friction between Hong Kong and Beijing increasing, Hong Kong’s press freedom will be further narrowed.

Hong Kong Journalist Association’s Chairman Cen Yilan said Hong Kong media’s self-censorship is becoming more serious. The journalist’s announcement immediately established the “Self-censorship Commission,” which accepts reporters and commentators’ complaints and exposes substantiated cases.

The report also criticized the government, in the past year, for information gradually becoming more private with official sites having a closed-door “briefings” in replacement of news conferences so they can avoid the media reporter’s questionings.

Hong Kong Journalist Association’s Freedom of the Press team member Mai Yanting said, “Financial Secretary Ceng Junhua has talked in a blog post that Hong Kong will likely face financial deficits. Important information should not be written behind the computer screen, but should be clearly explained in a press conference.”

The Government countered that each department has committed to the dissemination of information through various channels, to increase transparency, every major policies or measures are introduced timely.

A government spokesman said to Hong Kong’s media that the freedom of press will be protected by the “Basic Law”. The government “extremely respect and cherish” the freedom of press, and is committed to protecting it, and will work with the visual media as partners to actively provide easement.

“开水烫蛙”

wrchinawork

Members of the Hong Kong Journalist Association Mai Yinting (left), Cen Yilan (in), Ren Meizhen (right) shows “2014 Annual Report of Freedom of Expression” text (RTHK pictures 6/7/2014)

 

 

 

 

 

Firing incident and unemployment triggered Hong Kong media reporter’s March parade.
Photo by BBC

wrchinawork